The essay explores George Seurat’s unfinished artwork “The Circus”. The circus is his final artwork which he hung as part of an exhibit without completing it. The artist used the mixture of colors in his work however not through the widely embraced use of paint and brush…
The essay "Analysis of The Circus by George Seurat" examines the painting of famous artist Seurat. Due to the method’s demand for hard work, prevented its completion despite the published fact that he usually stays by himself working for long hours of the day and through the night on his paintings. The Circus as the title implies is the setting of the picture which shows the ringmaster on the forefront, the joyful dancing of the lady, prancing horse and the clown on his upside-down stunt. The painting depicts the gaiety going in the circus considered to have been a part of his experimentation of colors, as he also considered emotional characters coming out from his former mood of being very formal and static. Created during the years when Paris was still feeling the effects of the Franco-Prussian war, “The Circus” portrays the other side of the great devastation experienced during this time which recorded 36,000 people who died of starvation when the Germans besieged Paris and cut off all food supplies. Despite this fact, France rose to gather great minds from around the world and introduce their expertise and studies. It has been noted that Seurat and other impressionists never portrayed the dark side of the circumstances in France which could most probably be the reason behind the subject of this painting because Seurat would rather leave an impression to his audiences of the joyful pleasures the circus brings. During the time of Seurat, artworks have been a major contribution to the development of the country., attracting peoples from around the world not only in arts but also in other areas like philosophy, Sciences and Mathematics so that France then became the center of information and development. One of the developments produced in this era is what Seurat birthed as the Pointillism mentioned earlier which is also known as neo-impressionism. This was also the time when the ‘salon’, the French Academy of Art controlled the industry, dictating theme and style used in the artworks so that Seurat’s modern approach to his artwork was rejected because it was considered to be against the then generally accepted perception of art and beauty. The salon gave good exposure of artists and their works so it has been a very powerful tool to the success or fall of artists. Seurat was sneered at and his works have been despised by the impressionists but these did not thwart him in pursuing his personal style of performing arts in what he believed he could effectively use. He then joined hands with other artists whose works have also been rejected by the salon and formed an independent body where they coordinated their own exhibits. Contrary to what Seurat experienced with the impressionists, his artwork has been acclaimed by the increasingly educated population in the use of modern concepts. This gave Seurat a platform to continue with his style which he was known for and also to be the father of which, taking a little following and influencing other successful artists during his time. The ringmaster’s whip and the whiplash is the motif repetitively expressed in ...
Cite this document
(“Analysis of The Circus by George Seurat Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/visual-arts-film-studies/39916-analysis-of-the-circus-by-george-seurat
(Analysis of The Circus by George Seurat Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Analysis of The Circus by George Seurat Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/visual-arts-film-studies/39916-analysis-of-the-circus-by-george-seurat.
The novel 1984 is one of the greatest novels written by George Orwell due to its exploration of the social problems and diseases presented in a fictitious but relatable manner. The main issue tackled by the novel is the destructive effects of totalitarian society.
In a nutshell, self interest creates a provision for a substantial foundation on the notion that was developed on nations’ wealth. To add to that, as Smith’s work forms a bedrock for economic science in the modern world, self interest turns out to be the primary principle in economics.
John Steinbeck’s 1937 novel Of Mice and Men is the painful and difficult narrative of how the farmers and migrant ranch workers of California faced the horrifying consequences of the Great Depression. It is actually also a story of various struggles of people against their own selves – more particularly those of George and Lennie.
102). He named this creature as ‘Feejee mermaid’. Barnum was recognized as the “Shakespeare of Advertising” (Hartzman, p. 199), as a result of his ground-breaking as well as extraordinary initiatives. He recognized the way to bring supporters in, by providing them a glance of something that they had not seen earlier.
The audience wanted to see a great performance, to be enchanted by mystery and experience new feelings and emotions watching mysteries of a separate society, which is circus. This type of attitude concerns traditional circus.
“This circus was established 1987 in San Leandro by Greg Angelo Herrera”.He is a genuine San Franciscan and the artistic director of Velocity Arts and Entertainment and Velocity Circus.The persona of his has become synonymous with the exceptional nature in which he demonstrates the quality of his arts and entertainment.
In "The McDonaldization of Society," Ritzer takes the fast-food industry and its principles of business as an organizational pattern for emerging postmodern society. He points out that the book is not a criticism of McDonald's, nor even the fast-food business, but an analysis of how fast-food organizational practices have permeated into myriad aspects of our social lives.
This essay analyzes George Seurat’s Sunday Afternoon on the Island of the Grande Jatte and Paul Gauguin’s The Day of the Gods. The similarity of their theme allows the viewer to take in the differences that erupted between the soft, pointillist details of Seurat to the bold strokes of color that were driven under the brush of Gauguin.
According to the paper, the narrator has used irony and conflict as stylistic elements in order to communicate the main theme and purpose of the essay, which is to present evils and senselessness of imperialism. Combining the use of language and information with these two stylistic elements, fantastically.
According to the discussion the scene is a vital part of the movie highlighting how Little Tramp found his way into the circus and how he discovered that he became funny not on purpose but rather unintentionally. Tramp snatches the bread from Merna but then pities her and lets her have a slice of it.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Analysis of The Circus by George Seurat for FREE!