fting an age, contriving the attendant characters and showcasing an animal protagonist, with the objective of making them have an overall feel of this nonfiction drama through the medium of written word. In contrast, the movie version that is Seabiscuit is both versatile and constrained in many ways. The movie Seabiscuit does afford to extend to the viewers a very rich and all round sensory experience, going by the fact that it could directly stimulate the senses of the viewers. However, cinema being an art form constrained in terms of its time span, the need to retain emotional and factual continuity and the imperative to bring in drama, the movie does drop much in terms of the facts, characters and details, when compared to the book. Thereby, the book Seabiscuit: An American Legend is a well researched, detailed and engrossing nonfictional, biographical narrative, providing much information about and insight into the Great Depression, the sport of horse racing, and how a legendary race horse symbolized the resilient and unflinching spirit of those times. In comparison, the 2003 movie Seabiscuit happens to be a miniaturized human drama involving three shattered humans and an equally reclusive race horse, which somehow helps them come to terms with their hurt and loss. Yet, irrespective of the differences shown by these two works of art, going by the medium they subscribe to, to showcase an era and a sport, the movie Seabiscuit though compromising on facts, characters and details, does manage to retain the quintessential spirit and feel inherent in the book it is based on.
When it comes to comparing and contrasting the film and the book it is based on, one does need to mention that they very names of the book and the movie do elaborate on as to how they differ in terms of their focus, appeal and the intended impact. The book Seabiscuit: An American Legend, by its very name does convey that it’s a non-fiction, biographical and historical work that conveys the