Johnson was a member of the ring that planned Kennedy’s assassination (Stone 589). So, the most critical question in this film is the director’s agenda when he was making up this film. This essay examines Stone Oliver’s agenda in the film and whether the film was received, by both the public and the media, as it was intended. The assassination of President John F. Kennedy was a thrilling event that left the American people and the world startled. The world was confused the most when such an injustice in a developed world was tainted by unexplained occurrences when the assassination investigations started. The film captures this in detail by going back to the years when President Kennedy was President and the unfolding of the events that supposedly cost his life. Among the ones captured are the early years of Vietnam War, the invasion of the Bay of Pigs, the missile crisis in Cuba, and the Laotian civil war (Brent 51). It was in November 22, 1963 that President Kennedy was brutally killed. It was after this occasion that New Orleans Jim Garrison and team got some hints on the assassination, and they commenced their investigation but the Federal Government publicly rebukes the developments (Salewic 80). The New Orleans attorney is forced to close the case when the alleged assassin Lee Harvey Oswald is murdered before he could go on trial. This occurrence further startled the world as to the game which Kennedy’s assassins had launched. After this closure, the film captures the reopening of the investigation in 1966 when Garrison related his encounter to Senator Long while he was on a plane trip. The inaccuracies in the Warren commission’s report enabled Garrison to identify some conflicts. In the film, several witnesses are interrogated by Garrison and his staff including other witnesses involved with Oswald. His informal investigations led to another suspect Ferrie, who is put on the spot when a witness testified that he saw Ferrie conspiring with Oswald, Shaw, and some Latin men to murder the President (Gary 1). Another interesting development was placed by Jean Hill who told the investigators that she witnessed the killing, and had heard four to six shots in total coming from the grassy Knoll, but was coerced by the U.S. Secret Service to testify that she had heard three shots from the book depository (Brent 52). This revelation led Garrison team to believe that there were changes made to Hill’s testimony given to Warren commission. Garrison investigators revealed that from their logical analysis of the alleged crime scene, the shots were not made by one person; there were others who were involved in the shootouts and thus, Oswald was not the only assassin. Given that there were two close shots, there was a possibility that two more assassins were involved. Another message that Oliver was sending to the world was that the then senior government personalities and the security ring were involved in the murder. In this case, the film reveals that Garrison discovered electronic surveillance microphones placed in his offices and meets X, a high official in Washington DC who revealed that the government, the CIA, the FBI, the U. S. Secret Service and the then Vice President Lyndon Johnson had a motive to cover up the cause of Kennedy’s death (Gary 1). Mr. X explains that president Kennedy was killed because it was
Cite this document
(“For the film JFK, what is Oliver Stone's agenda Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/visual-arts-film-studies/76618-for-the-film-jfk-what-is-oliver-stone-s-agenda
(For the Film JFK, What Is Oliver Stone'S Agenda Essay)
“For the Film JFK, What Is Oliver Stone'S Agenda Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/visual-arts-film-studies/76618-for-the-film-jfk-what-is-oliver-stone-s-agenda.
Cited: 0 times
Tutor name Date Oliver Stone's agenda in the film "JFK" Oliver Stone’s film, JFK (1991) is a political thriller that looks into the events that inspired the infamous assassination of President John F. Kennedy. In this movie, Oliver places a controversial allegation of a planned cover-up of the events investigated by Jim Garrison, the former New Orleans attorney (Riordan 363)…
Time ticked slowly as the President wafted through Dealey Plaza that afternoon. Smiling at the crowds, travelling in the limousine, all was well received by the people of Texas as they screamed praises for the faces of renowned importance passing by them.
The assassination of JFK took place on 22 November 1963 in Dallas, Texas when he was riding in a motorcade. Lee Harvey Oswald is the man believed to have shot and killed the president. Lee was arrested for the murder of Kennedy and was taken into custody, but he did stay long enough before Jack Ruby shot him.
For instance, Stone’s Platoon and Halberstam’s The Making of a Quagmire are considered artistic documentaries of the said war. In these two works, Vietnam War is portrayed in simple representations as those narrate the experiences of soldiers. The two works, admired by critiques as purely realistic, are the products of the authors’ experiences during the war.
The story of Oliver Twist is relatively well-known. It was written by Charles Dickens in 1838 and published as Oliver Twist or The Parish Boy's Progress. The basics of the story follow the tale of a young orphan. When he is nine years old, he is deemed a troublemaker so the workhouse that has been raising him apprentices him out to an undertaker
The reason the story is so well-known today is because it was made into a relatively popular movie which has been remade again many times, the musical Oliver! directed by Carol Reed and produced by John Woolf. However, in translating a novel to film, there are often many parts that must be cut.
According to many authors, the facts in Oliver Stone’s JFK provide an interesting overlook at the film and the liberties it took with the truth. The film brings out a life changing ordeal on the assassination of John F. Kennedy and it is no embroidery hence seeing the movie vagaries lives for the facts contained in it.
One essential component of the agenda-setting process is what E. E. Schattschneider ( 1975:69) refers to as the "mobilization of bias"--some matters are organized into politics while others are organized out. drawing from Schattschneider, as "a set of prime values, beliefs, rituals, and institutional procedures ('rules of the game') that operate methodically and consistently to the benefit of certain persons and groups at the expense of others." They raise the prospect that through the "mobilization of bias" some individuals would limit decision making to relatively non-controversial matters by influencing and controlling the political grounds in which the issues surface.
There are guidelines and principles that govern the code of conduct in any organization, and Wall Street is no exception. The financial activities carried out need to have particular guidelines in order to protect shareholders from any fraudulent and
The article therefore investigates the development of the media in the decade and the portrayal of the vital function. In investigating the role of the media in setting agenda, the article analyses political activities in a country.
Agenda setting is the creation of public concern and awareness of salient issues by news media. It is also defined as all the issues that perceived by citizens to be worthy of attention by public authorities. Types of agenda include media agenda. Media agenda are all issues brought into the public light by the media.
17 pages (4250 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic For the film JFK, what is Oliver Stone's agenda for FREE!