The abstract arts: Suprematism and Constructivism developed in Russia while De Stijl developed in Holland. They all developed at the beginning of the 21st century. From 1917, the Bolshek revolution led to the blooming of the modernist styles. Suprematism developed as a spiritual freedom art that did not present art as a representation of material actual objects but as an emotional, inner feeling of one’s imagination that evoked meditation. It utilized the use of color, brush strokes and visual rhythm to engage spirituality. Kasimir Malevich founded the non-objective art in 1913. Malevich believed that the supreme reality of art was to liberate from the representational world and evoke ‘pure feeling.’ Bothe Malevich and Lissitzky believed that art could be used as an agent of change, and this was specified to societal change in Constructivism. Constructivism on the other hand developed when Russians faced many social and political injustices and there was need for art not to represent existing objects, but to address the needs of the people. It revolutionized art from’ art for art’s sake’ to ‘art for the society.’ Art in this style has addressed the needs of the society, and has influenced the modern world on political, social and architectural realms. El Lissitzky, a Russian, contributed to this artistic revolution by developing constructivism. The art form, as Suprematism, used similar geometric language but abandoned the mystical vision that favored its ‘socialism of vision.’ It was a Utopian projection.
Cite this document
(“Suprematism, Constructivism and De Stijl Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/visual-arts-film-studies/792969-suprematism-constructivism-and-de-stijl
(Suprematism, Constructivism and De Stijl Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Suprematism, Constructivism and De Stijl Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/visual-arts-film-studies/792969-suprematism-constructivism-and-de-stijl.
Cited: 0 times
The essay explores Similarities and Differences of the Art Styles: "Suprematism, Constructivism and De Stijl". they appeared at different periods, they had similarities, which blended them in a common essence. At the same time, the three art concepts had differences…
De Stijl was basically an artistic movement which included the body of work created between 1917 to 1931. Founded in 1917, De Stijl also became one of the most famous art magazines. Neo- plasticism, which refers to the work of plastic art, was the main artistic philosophy behind the De Stijl movement.
Those which influenced actual revolutions and changes are considered phenomenal, and one of the more specific in this instance is constructivism. Constructivism is an artistic philosophy understood to have rejected the idea of autonomous art and instead used art for social purposes spanning its influence not only in architecture but also on industrial design, fashion, and performing arts music, dance and theatre.
Constructivism is an approach that is used to explain different theories. It is a theory that holds that all bodies of knowledge and all other disciplines were constructed by communities and individuals. It argues that knowledge was discovered by humans then was absorbed into them, and if not so, it was discovered from nature.
The paper provides a critical assessment of three works of Modern art. The relationship between these works of art and others in the Modern art era will be examined, their similar as well as different approaches. Abstract is the most recognized of the Modern arts. It includes cubism, expressionism and constructivism.
El Lissitzky was an important part of the Russian avant grade, playing several key roles. For example, together with his mentor Kazimir Malevich, he was instrumental to the development of Suprematism, which is an art movement that unarguably started in Russia and later went on to create a fusion between Suprematism, Constructivism and Neo-plasticism.
Social constructivism "brings the self-inflicted wounds of relativism, when the sociologist's own knowledge can be of no more relevance than that of anyone else". If relativism is accepted, then the logical requirements of sociology cannot be satisfied, and sociology itself is impossible. It is true that knowledge is socially constructed in the interests.
Constructivism is a learning theory that is supported by teacher but initiated and directed by the student. This means that the children in the class are not only copying the ideas delivered by the teacher but they are constructing their own ideas according to their own understanding in the guidance of the teacher.
The theory of constructivism states that learning is best understood, accumulated and applied when the student or the person develops his own mental model of the information. There may be several approaches to this philosophy but they all believe in one common idea that learning is best developed when the student or learner actively.
In the educational setting, constructivism refers to the kind of learning that is active and constructive. The constructivism theory was proposed by Dewey, Vygotsky, Piaget, amongst others, who advocated that learning is practical, and that the learners must actively be involved in the construction of information that ultimately, leads to learning.
In this work, I am going to compare and contrast the various different views of constructivism by its authors and critics. I am going to look at some of the features that are similar across the three authors, the differences and reasons for existence of these differences. The three authors include: Ted Hopf, Jeffrey T. Checkel and Alexander Wendt.
3 pages (750 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Suprematism, Constructivism and De Stijl for FREE!