StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Did Marx Think That Capitalism Is Unjust - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Did Marx Think That Capitalism Is Unjust" discusses that the modern age supporters claimed that this theory actually explained the reasons for the economic inequality that is still existent in the society. However, it has very few practical implications when empirically tested…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.8% of users find it useful
Did Marx Think That Capitalism Is Unjust
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Did Marx Think That Capitalism Is Unjust"

? Did Marx think that capitalism is unjust? Table of Contents Introduction 3 Discussion 3 Conclusion 7 Introduction The theory of Karl Marx popularlyknown as Marxism as opposed to Capitalism looks at the society from a socio- economic perspective and emphasises the concept of class struggle. The main proponents of this philosophy were Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. The theory of Marxism is based on the materialistic theories of Economics and productions. The four forces of production form the basis of this theory, namely, Land, Labour, Capital and Organisation. The theory of Base and the Superstructure is also a part of this theory. The capitalist society made of human beings form the base over which the Superstructure of the social, political, legal or religious institutions of the state is built (Friedman & Friedman, 1962, p. 42). The ownership class dominates this superstructure but the economic base will have its effect on the operation of the Superstructure. When a conflict between the social relations of the base and the owners of the forces of production takes place, it leads to a change in the superstructure (Lukes, 1987, p.47). The distinctiveness of a social class will depend on the relationship it has with the forces of production. This particular theory of Marx led to various controversies in the modern times. Discussion Capitalism theory discusses about an economic structure in which there is private ownership of means of production and the owners have the sole motive of profit maximisation (David, 1987, p.72). The main components of capitalist society are accumulation of capital, competition in markets and labour who would be paid wages. At the end of feudalism, capitalism has evolved in the Western countries. Marx explains that a Capitalist Society can be classified into two classes such as the Bourgeois and the Proletariat (Dahrendorf, 1959, p.21). The Bourgeois or the Capitalist class are the ones who owned the means of production, which include the land, raw materials, machinery which are required to produce the final product. The Proletariat on the other hand are those who do not have possession of these means and hence trades of their labour in return of wages. According to his theory the ownership class and the working class are dependent on each other in a view for exchanging mutually while the production process would go on (Brass, 2004, p.23). The ownership class would need the labour class for the production with the use of their physical labour. The working class would get the opportunity to work and earn wages which is necessary for their survival (Schumpeter, 2013, P.36). This relation is however governed by exploitation and conflict of interest. Karl Marx claimed that the so called capitalists would be able to earn profits by exploitation of their workers. Profits are accumulated by the capitalist's requisition of surplus value formed by unstinted labour of the workers (Carver, 1982, p.43). Put in a different way, the wages that the labourers were paid were way less than the value that they contributed to their employers. The theory states that the workers work for a period of necessary labour and they return back the same worth of production as the wages they are paid. The concept of surplus labour comes here. The period of time when the workers produce in excess of the necessary labour is the capital gain for the employers. They make no equivalent outlay in return of this. Thus the rate of surplus value would be the degree of exploitation the employers impose on their labourers (Bengo, n.d., p.9). Marx regarded this phenomenon as a system where there was exploitation of labourers systematically. Marxism incorporated the concept of non reciprocal benefit where one party benefits the other but the other does not reciprocate in the same way. Thus one party remain wrongly exploited by the unjust. This according to Marx is exploitation and Capitalism is unjust. Marx held that a worker was ethically entitled to the product of his own labour with certain deductions like the establishment cost of the production or for the welfare of the differently able (McLellan, 2007, p.27). According to him in a socialist society there would be no inequality prevailing and the workers would get remuneration of exactly what they produced. In a capitalistic society this does not take place and the labourer gets wages of lesser value than what they produce. The surplus value goes straight into the possession of the owner class. The disabled, however, are entitled to a part of this value from a moral perspective. One school of thought also believes that the owner class imposes coercion on the workers in order to extract unilateral benefit from them. Marx posited that the bourgeois class exploit the working class (Bottomore, 1979, p.37). They do not make any contribution to the production explicitly or implicitly. Hence he proposed that it is the labourers who are entitled to the entire output produced. Marx argues that Capitalism has distinctive characteristics. It is not just a commodity exchange scheme but also capital development in monetary terms with the sole motive of earning profits by procuring commodities and their improvisation into final products which can earn higher compensation. The basic idea of this philosopher relies on the fact that the Have not’s are exploited by the have classes. Marx formulated the theory of labour value, which supports that value of a particular commodity is the necessary labour time capitalised in it. While making the production set up, the owner class buys the labourer’s power to work, i.e., his capability to labour, for a particular day. This according to Marx is a commodity and has some value. This value is determined in the same manner as the values of the other commodities are determined. This would essentially be the value of the commodities that the labourer would need on a particular day that would keep him alive for that day (Kolakowski, 1976, p.62). If it is assumed that the first four hours of a typical working day is exhausted in producing commodities equivalent to the wages of the labourer, then that component of his production would be regarded as the necessary labour. If a worker performs production in excess of this it would be regarded as surplus labour and the Value of production would be surplus value which would be taken away by the Capitalists (Avineri, 1968, p.43). This surplus value gives rise to profit for the bourgeois class. Marx argued that labour is the only commodity has excess capacity of production. In Marx’s opinion this is also called variable capital. With more mechanisation of the industry, the constant capital is used more and the variable capital is used less hence the rate of profit would fall. Marx held that in the development of the society the transformation from Capitalism to Socialism is essential. The proponents of Marxism hold that a socialist society would be advanced than the Capitalist counterpart (Trigger, 2007, p.35). The theory of Marx faced several criticisms. The supporters of Democratic Socialism do not agree with the theory that socialism is achievable through class struggle. Some of the anarchists argue that there should be an intermediate phase between these transitions. Others have cited that this kind of process would give rise to coercion. The renowned Economist Alfred Marshall had criticised Marx by saying that the production in a factory is not only the product of the labour of the workers but also a joint product of the performance of the managers and the capital and the raw materials employed. Keynes has described the book of Karl Marx as inapplicable to the modern day. The supporters of Egalitarianism disagree that the concept of sharing of income diminishes the incentives or enthusiasm of the individuals to work and thus incomes cannot be generalised. Each person should be rewarded as per his performance (Mill and Bentham, 2004, p. 11). Empirical Analyses across countries and over time advocate the fact that Marxism had failed to explain the social evolution theory. Marx could not even implement it successfully in his own country, though it had some significance in Russia and China where the principles of Marx have been implemented. Some academicians argue that the predictions of Marx have failed because he had predicted that the revolution would start in those countries with the most advanced capitalistic societies (Althusser, 1967, p.12). But that remained in the books as a theory only and did not happen in reality. Conclusion Marx himself believed that capitalism should be encouraged to a certain extent because it would help in the economic and technological progress of a society. However it also has the potential to destruct a society because it is an abominably unfair and unjust setup where the have not’s were exploited by the have’s. There is unequal distribution of power and wealth and an inclination to move towards monopolisation. The theory proposed by Marx gave rise to various other theories in the years to come. It gave rise to many revolutionary movements which would lead to a change in the different societies across the globe. His works also inspired and laid the foundation of various other communist ideas. The modern age supporters claimed that this theory actually explained the reasons for the economic inequality that is still existent in the society. However it has very little practical implications when empirically tested. References Althusser, L., 1969. For Marx. London: Penguin. Avineri, S. ,1968. The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx. London:Cambridge University Press. Bengo, F. M., No. Date. Marxist Theories of Class and Class Struggle. The Essen.Ce of Marxist Theory and Class Struggle, Vol (3), no.1, pp-9-42. Bottomore, T., 1979. Karl Marx. Oxford: Blackwell. Brass, C. M. et. Al., 2004. Act assessment: The Best Test Prep for the Act. Capitalistic Views. Research & Education Association. Carver, T., 1982. Marx's Social Theory. New York: Oxford University Press. Dahrendorf, R., 1959. Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. David, C., 1987. A Farewell to Marx: An Outline and Appraisal of His Theories. Middlesex: Penguin Books. Friedman, M. & Friedman, R. D., 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Capitalism. University of Chicago Press. Kolakowski, L. ,1976. Main Currents of Marxism. New York: Oxford University Press. Lukes, S., 1987. Marxism and Morality. New York: Oxford University Press. McLellan, D. 2007. Marxism After Marx. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Mill, J. S., and Bentham, J., 2004. Utilitarianism and other essays. London: Penguin Books. Schumpeter, J. A., 2013. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Capitalism. Routledge. Trigger, B. G., 2007. A History of Archaeological Thought (Second Edition). New York: Cambridge University Press. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Did Marx think that capitalism is unjust Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Did Marx think that capitalism is unjust Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1484362-did-marx-think-that-capitalism-is-unjust
(Did Marx Think That Capitalism Is Unjust Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Did Marx Think That Capitalism Is Unjust Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/history/1484362-did-marx-think-that-capitalism-is-unjust.
“Did Marx Think That Capitalism Is Unjust Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1484362-did-marx-think-that-capitalism-is-unjust.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Did Marx Think That Capitalism Is Unjust

State Capitalism

State capitalism is a controversial subject in the world.... “State-capitalism is in itself the total contradiction, absolute antagonism.... This paper analyses how state capitalism is a contradiction.... According to Marx capitalism is the number one enemy of socialism.... In European countries capitalism is currently working in three different forms; Market, Managed and State.... He also pointed out that capitalism would result in over production ultimately since there is no control over the production activities of capitalists....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

Analysis Karl Marx View of Capitalism

The major area that Marx covered in his theory of capitalism is the relationship that exists between Proletariat and Bourgeoisie.... In this regard, Marx just like Engels, his fellow philosopher was on the opinion that capitalism should be emulated by government and business communities since it improved the living standards of individuals by initiating technological, scientific and economic developments.... This paper seeks to analyze Karl Marx view of capitalism and the major criticism of the system by Karl Marx and other individuals....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Karl Marxs Views on Capitalism

It is from the two facets of capitalist exploitation that the question whether marx think it unjust or not stems.... The discussions about Marx's ideas on justice as seen from his description of capitalism has consequently resulted on debase whether he considered capitalism unjust or not.... Over the years, there have been those who have argued that Marx did not explicitly consider capitalism unjust while others have argued that from his arguments, it can be deduced that Marx saw capitalism as unjust....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Marx and Weber- rise of capitalism

This paper investigates into the theories presented by these two sociologists on the rise and growth of capitalism in the Western society.... The essay compares the differences in the approaches of Marx and Weber towards the emergence of capitalism and the crucial factors behind its origin and growth.... This paper investigates into the theories presented by these two sociologists on the rise and growth of capitalism in the Western society.... The essay compares the differences in the approaches of Marx and Weber towards the emergence of capitalism and the crucial factors behind its origin and growth....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Ideas of the Establishment of the Capitalist State

The paper "Ideas of the Establishment of the Capitalist State" tells that Marx works were primarily based on the destruction of capitalism.... Marx was hastily looking for ways to tell the people why capitalism had faced its demise and failure.... The working classes had been radicalized, proving to be an example of socialism's effects against capitalism's effects.... The Welfare State did serve capital and investment by preventing capitalism's downfall and becoming an organic part of capitalist domination....
7 Pages (1750 words) Book Report/Review

The Ways in Which Marx and Weber Understand the Nature of Capitalism

The paper "The Ways in Which Marx and Weber Understand the Nature of capitalism" states that for Weber the appearance of capitalism should be expected since man is strongly dependent on money – in all its forms, including the property, a part of capitalism for Marx.... For Marx the appearance and the development of capitalism have been promoted through the efforts of labour class against the feudal style of governance; in other words, capitalism has been created by labourers who lost its control – the capitalists gained the advantage to control the exchange of capital in the capitalistic system of governance....
7 Pages (1750 words) Literature review

Marxs Argument about Capitalism and His Theory of Human Nature

arx's argument that capitalism is unfit for human consumption is supported by the belief that capitalism is to blame for the economic recessions the world has faced in recent times.... Marx also lamented that capitalism only targets profits and not social needs and exploits the working class that creates new values of which the capitalist enjoys the bigger portion while the worker only receives wages.... This work called "Marx's Argument about capitalism and His Theory of Human Nature" describes Karl Marx's arguments about capitalism and relates these arguments to his theories on alienation and human nature....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Marxs Class, Alienation and Capitalism

The paper "Marx's Class, Alienation and capitalism" states that for the capitalist to survive in the competitive market, he would have to endanger his business.... These emotions are reflected as a result of capitalism pending that it generates disturbances in social relationships and the self.... marx introduced the class theory that showed that classes would grow on common ground that advanced their interests.... In his manuscripts of 1843 and 1844, marx uses the term Entfremdung ('alienation' or 'estrangement')....
12 Pages (3000 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us