StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Why Had Most of the Advances in Civil Rights Come Through the Federal Courts - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay "Why Had Most of the Advances in Civil Rights Come Through the Federal Courts" focuses on Jim Crow laws that plagued the United States of America during the 1890s was a clear illustration of the unfortunate reality that degraded citizenship rights of African Americans. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.1% of users find it useful
Why Had Most of the Advances in Civil Rights Come Through the Federal Courts
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Why Had Most of the Advances in Civil Rights Come Through the Federal Courts"

If nonviolence proved to be a successful strategy for confronting segregation, why had most of the advances in civil rights come through the federal courts and not through the local organizations or individuals? Did white opposition hinder or help the civThe Jim Crow laws that plagued the United States of America during the 1890’s was the clear illustration of the unfortunate reality that degraded the citizenship rights of African Americans. The racial segregation that was dominant in southern states was due to factual legislation that the state government imposed.

The Supreme Court decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, which clearly gave a mandate of “separate but equal facilities” added more gasoline to the fire. It undoubtedly hindered growth for adequate economic opportunity and give rise to hatred groups such as the KKK. Without a doubt, legislative achievements that were obtained during the reconstruction were completely dissolved. The fact that the idea of “separate by equal” may be feasible to the American society, but the reality of the matter was the fact that nothing was equal.

The profound impact of this doctrine was clearly diminishing the power of the federal government to interfere in state affairs to deter another civil war. The Supreme Court’s decision at the Plessy case was further elaborated by Supreme Court justice john Harlan as he states,” “we shall enter upon an era of constitutional law, when the rights of freedom and American citizenship cannot receive from the nation that efficient protection which heretofore was unhesitatingly accorded to slavery and the rights of the master.

” Undoubtedly, Harlan himself was alarmed about the non-implementation and the upright ignorance of the 14th Amendment. To combat this absurd idea of racism and prejudice, the NCAAP became one of the first organizations that advocated for the civil rights. The result was a collaborative effort in which the NAACP initiated the Civil Rights Movement. Nonetheless, frustration continued to mount as the integration blacks in white school was resisted by the mass majority of the white population. Hence, the goal then for Martin Luther King and other civil rights leader was to combat this type of racism through the use of civil disobedience.

Well-known to others, the NAACP along with Martin Luther King took inspiration from the Indian leader known as Ghandi, who had used civil disobedience in his efforts to fight for Indian independence against the British. Thus, the push to incorporate civil disobedience through boycotts and “sit-ins” became essential tactics for the Civil Rights movement. One can argue that it was also effective as evidence of changing attitudes were seen throughout nation in which even small businesses began supporting the movement.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“If nonviolence proved to be a successful strategy for confronting Essay”, n.d.)
If nonviolence proved to be a successful strategy for confronting Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1582948-if-nonviolence-proved-to-be-a-successful-strategy-for-confronting-segregation-why-had-most-of-the-advances-in-civil-rights-come-through-the-federal-courts-and-not-through-the-local-organizations-or-individuals-did-white-opposition-hinder-or-help-the-civ
(If Nonviolence Proved to Be a Successful Strategy for Confronting Essay)
If Nonviolence Proved to Be a Successful Strategy for Confronting Essay. https://studentshare.org/history/1582948-if-nonviolence-proved-to-be-a-successful-strategy-for-confronting-segregation-why-had-most-of-the-advances-in-civil-rights-come-through-the-federal-courts-and-not-through-the-local-organizations-or-individuals-did-white-opposition-hinder-or-help-the-civ.
“If Nonviolence Proved to Be a Successful Strategy for Confronting Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1582948-if-nonviolence-proved-to-be-a-successful-strategy-for-confronting-segregation-why-had-most-of-the-advances-in-civil-rights-come-through-the-federal-courts-and-not-through-the-local-organizations-or-individuals-did-white-opposition-hinder-or-help-the-civ.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Why Had Most of the Advances in Civil Rights Come Through the Federal Courts

Justice System in the United Arab Emirates

Civil law system: The UAE functions in civil law statutes and such systems are the primary source of law.... Decisions of the high courts in the UAE are not based on any decisions made by low courts.... “In litigation matters, the pleadings submitted by the parties - plaints or written statements - play a determining role as the courts generally decide cases based upon them” (Latheef par 4).... Every constituent state of Emirates, except for Ras Al Kaimah and Dubai, are part of a federal judicial system and both of them have self-governing judicial systems....
21 Pages (5250 words) Research Paper

Civilian courts and military courts

MILITARY courts AND CIVILIAN courts [School] [Course/Number] May 28, 2015 [Instructor Name] MILITARY courts AND CIVILIAN courts In a democratic state, it is essential that an independent and impartial judiciary system is established for the purpose of achieving the republican concept of the separation of powers among the three co-equal branches of the government.... The judiciary in particular, is vested with the sole power to conduct judicial review and in such inferior courts as Congress may establish....
3 Pages (750 words) Research Paper

Post 9/11 Government Involvement and Constitutional Liberties have changed

Similarly, the federal Wiretap Act of 1968, or Title III permitted police to intercept communications if sufficient evidence was available pertaining to some kind of criminal activities.... His point was that the legislation was not for changing the demarcation line between civil rights and law enforcement.... The purpose was to enhance law enforcement's authority to have a close watch on internet communications taking benefits of advances in science and technology on their efforts on terrorism....
12 Pages (3000 words) Term Paper

Basic Readings in US Democracy

the federal Government is further broken down into substructure that includes: the Legislative Branch who takes care of promulgating statutes and policies; the Executive, which composes the President, cabinet agencies and military service, and finally the Judiciary Branch more commonly known as the courts.... the federal Government is further broken down into substructure that includes: the Legislative Branch who takes care of promulgating statutes and policies; the Executive, which composes the President, cabinet agencies and military service, and finally the Judiciary Branch more commonly known as the courts....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

ECHR 1950&UK Human Rights Act 1998: Protection of Freedom of Expression and Prohibition on Torture

owever, UK courts can use their power to protect any religious feelings as held in Wingrove v UK4 where a ban on short film “Visions of Ecstasy” was sought under blasphemous.... Under English law, there is no specific protection against freedom of speech before the introduction of the Human rights Act 1998 and untill then, a claimant can seek a remedy only under common law for any infringement of his freedom of speech.... Thus, judges in UK are under obligation to develop the common law in accordance with Convention rights as regards to right to the freedom of expression1....
10 Pages (2500 words) Coursework

Law of Civil Liberties & Human Rights: Contempt of Court

There are two types of contempt of courts recognized by the judiciary system The law of contempt aims at providing uniform justice and will strongly condemn any action against the law implementing mechanism.... The author of the paper assesses the status of the law of contempt and its relevance in the present day society, studies and analyzes the acts or statutes relating to the law of contempt and evaluates the effect of the law of contempt on civil liberties and human rights ....
20 Pages (5000 words) Essay

Hong Kong Courts Sentences

This report "Hong Kong courts Sentences" presents the concept of lenient sentences by Hong Kong court that happens to a great extent however it is very difficult for the general public to question this issue because they do not understand in totality the power concept.... ong Kong law courts have been criticized for the way they handle trials and the process of criminal litigation in general.... The immense power given to the Hong Kong courts is the major determinant of problems experienced in sentencing cases....
11 Pages (2750 words) Report

The Judicial Proceedings in the Supreme Court of New South Wales

This court has unrestricted jurisdiction within the state, especially in civil matters.... It was modeled to look like Westminster's superior courts.... It is worth noting that a superior court of general jurisdiction for instance New South Wales' supreme Court of cannot be underprivileged of counteractive or even geographic jurisdiction in its State, however, this can be done by express statutory words as well as through implication.... It usually adjudicates the most serious criminal cases....
12 Pages (3000 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us