StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Issues of Tort Liability - Case Study Example

Summary
"Issues of Tort Liability" paper analyzes the case where fire breaks out at Bilal’s factory due to faulty wiring installed by Spark’s electricians. The fire brigade is called and leaves after the fire appears to have been extinguished. As a result of the fire, the factory is closed for three months…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92% of users find it useful
Issues of Tort Liability
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Issues of Tort Liability"

Law of Tort 2.0. Bilal’s Factory 2 The case A fire breaks out at Bilal’s factory due to faulty wiring installed by Spark’s electricians. The fire brigade is called and leaves after the fire appears to have been extinguished. Unfortunately some embers are still smouldering and the fire flares up again during the night. Extensive damage occurs to completed orders and to machinery. The fire brigade is called again and Chris one of the firemen suffers lung damage from smoke inhalation. As a result of the fire the factory is closed for three months. Bilal loses stock worth £15,000 and is unable to meet the orders he was working on at the time of the fire. These are worth £6,000. The worst problem though is that he loses customers. His profits have been reduced by £60,000 compared to last year, Discuss any issues of tort liability arising from the above scenario. (45% marks) 2.2. Analysis of the case In analysing this case, determination of negligence takes precedence so that the person and or entity liable for the tort can be identified. From the statement of the case, one thing is certain – the case is quite complicated. It is highly probable that two parties are liable for tort1. Firstly, negligence is suspected on the part of Spark’s electricians. Spark would then be the primary defendant and his electricians will be accessories to the tort. The elements of negligence are: (1) duty of care (2) breach of this duty (3) breach causing harm in effect and (4) harm must not be too remote a consequence of the breach2. Duty of care is established by way of a three-step test. The test will be described here and applied in the case of Spark’s electricians. The first step is – reasonable foreseeability of harm. As the fire is caused by faulty wiring, there is an obviously reasonable foreseeability of harm from fire due to faulty wiring. The second test – claimant and defendant ought to be in a relationship of proximity. It was Spark’s electricians who installed the wiring on Bilal’s factory. Since the case statement given in the preceding section did not elaborate on any details, it is apparent that Spark’s electricians were commissioned by Bilal to work on the electrical wiring of the factory. Hence, Spark’s relationship to Bilal could probably be one of electrical contractor – client relationship. At this point a relationship of proximity is established. The third test – is to answer the question of whether it is fair, just and reasonable to impose liability to impose liability on the defendant for his negligent actions. In this regard, had it not been for faulty wiring, no fire would have broke out in Bilal’s factory. The burden of proof lies in the fire investigator to establish that, indeed, it was faulty wiring which triggered the fire, beyond reasonable doubt. Once the origin of the fire is confirmed to be due to faulty wiring, it would then be fair, just and reasonable to sue Spark for tort due to negligence. From available case data, and granting that a confirmation is made as to the origin of the fire being faulty wiring, duty of care would have been established. Next, there is a need to show that such duty of care has been breached3. By installing faulty wirings on Bilal’s factory, Spark’s electricians exhibited behaviour below the threshold of a “reasonable man” since conscientious and responsible electricians would not have utilized and installed faulty wiring for their client’s factory. Based on case data, there is good reason to believe that duty of care has, indeed, been breached. Causation should then provide evidence of a direct association between the negligent behaviour of the Spark’s electricians and Bilat, the claimant’s damages and losses4. The liability on negligent behaviour is established when duty of care owed by Spark’s electricians to Bilal is breached as shown in the preceding paragraph. Causation of losses and damages are said to have been precipitated by such breach of duty of care, so that it is just reasonable for Spark and his electricians to compensate Bilal for the losses and damages. The first complication in this case is the role played by the fire brigade, who are believed to have also been negligent in the performance of their duties. Duty of care by the fire brigade is also stablished by way of the three-step test. The first step is – reasonable foreseeability of harm. As the second fire is caused by embers left by the fire brigade while still smouldering and the fire flaring up again in the night, there is reasonable, foreseeability of harm from fire due to embers left burning by the fire brigade. This is, however, harder to prove in the court of law. The second test – claimant and defendant ought to be in a relationship of proximity. The case statement indicated that the fire brigade was called upon the put out both the first and the second fires which broke out. Hence, the fire brigade’s relationship to Bilal is emergency service provider (firefighting) – client relationship. At this point a relationship of proximity is established. The third test – is to answer the question of whether it is fair, just and reasonable to impose liability to impose liability on the defendant for his negligent actions. In this case, had it not been for negligently leaving embers burning during the first fire, no second would have broke out in Bilal’s factory. There is no burden of proof in this regard since, indeed, a second fire broke out which suggests that the fire was not totally put out. Unless the fire investigation would come up with evidence that the second fire was initiated through another cause, it would be fair, just and reasonable to sue the fire brigade for tort due to negligence. To show that such duty of care has been breached, it should be stressed that the fire brigade also exhibited behaviour below the threshold of “reasonable men” when they left the fire scene without double-checking if the fire had been completely put out. Hence, there also good reason to believe that duty of care has been breached. Causation should offer proof of a direct linkage between the negligent behaviour of the fire brigade and Bilat, the claimant’s damages and losses5. Causation of losses and damages are said to have been caused jointly with Spark’s electricians for such breach of duty of care. It is also just reasonable for the fire brigade to compensate Bilal for the losses and damages. 2.3. References Harlow, C. 2005. Understanding tort law. 3rd ed. London: Sweet and Maxwell. Madden, M. S. ed. 2005. Exploring tort law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Stephenson, G. 2000. Sourcebook on torts. 2nd ed. London: Cavendish Publishing. Weinrib, E. J. 2003. Tort law: cases and materials. 2nd ed. Toronto: Edmond Montgomery Publications. Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Issues of Tort Liability

How Tort Law Can Be Described

In order to discuss the Issues of Tort Liability arising from the given case, it is imperative to further explain the meaning of negligence.... The paper "How Tort Law Can Be Described" states that the aims of tort laws are designed to compensate someone who has suffered a wrong resulting in injury or loss of property at the hands of the defendant and to deter persons from acting in such a way that would infringe another person's rights.... In this case, negligence is a common form of tort law which can be punishable if carelessness is proved and the victim will be entitled to get compensation....
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

Supreme Court Needs to Lay down New Rules on the Issue of Liability for Negligence

The paper "Supreme Court Needs to Lay down New Rules on the Issue of liability for Negligence" highlights that in order to incur liability, the defendant should have reasonably foreseen the probability of damage to the claimant and yet the former still continued with his negligent act.... In order to impose liability for negligence, there must be a duty of care owed by the defendant to the complainant that has been breached and results in damage or injury to the claimant....
3 Pages (750 words) Research Paper

Ethics Questions: Torts and Product Liability

In criminal law, the state may order the individual who has committed the crime to compensate victims; however, in the law of tort, victims are not part of the criminal action and they themselves sue criminals for compensation.... 25), law of tort is desirable for risks that third parties are involved in and there is no information.... The state uses criminal law to protect the society through enforcing criminal punishment, unlike the law of tort, which seeks to protect the society through victim compensation with regards to punitive damages....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Product Liability and Intentional Tort

Product liability law is a division of tort law which seeks to a cause of action against the product's manufacturer, seller or designer in situations where a person is injured by the product.... Hypothetical Issues on Product liability and Intentional Tort Professor Institution Hypothetic 1: Product liability issues in the case Chase's hypothetic case of injury by the paper shredding machine within the work place touches on whether Chase should be compensated for personal injuries caused by the machine....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Tort Law and the Liabilities

To succeed in a tort lawsuit, it is necessary that the parties understand the basic principles and implications of tort.... One of the rights of victims of tort is entitlement to receive financial damages from those responsible.... The Liabilities First and foremost, it is vital that the basic principles and implication of tort lawsuits is known.... This type of compensation could also be paid if a victim of tort is severely disabled or incapacitated....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Law of Tort Personal Statement

Tort is a wrong and the law of tort is designed for people who are victimised because of the faults of others.... The law of tort is unique in the sense that it solely deals with the persons who are victims of some wrong committed by others.... The underlying concept one's duty to safeguard the interests of others, is the vital ingredient of the law of tort.... This aspect of the law of tort is often embroiled in controversy with regard to the extent of economic compensation the victim is liable to get....
4 Pages (1000 words) Personal Statement

Liability for Negligence

This assignment "liability for Negligence" focuses on Dappy Baking plc's liability for negligence and discusses the various methods Tulisa could use to achieve compensation, i.... Business Law No: Business Law Task Discuss Dappy Baking plc's liability for negligence.... Furthermore, the law of negligence under common law is one side of law of liability.... The guidelines were a) reasonably foreseeable; b) relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant exists; c) must be fair, just and reasonable to impose liability....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

The Vicarious Liabilitys Doctrine

he common rule within the law of tort is that an individual who approves a tort will individually be accountable for harm or damage as an outcome.... "The Vicarious liability's Doctrine" paper examines vicarious liability during the employment period and vicarious liability in a statutory duty.... icarious liability ... icarious liability is considered the supreme liability of a party- usually the lawful principal – for misdemeanours of another party....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us