StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Portrayal of Women in Susan Glaspell's Jury of Her Peers - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "The Portrayal of Women in Susan Glaspell’s Jury of Her Peers" discusses that Primarily Susan tells how women’s view is different from that of the man. Her story tells about male oppression, domination and women’s subservient position in the early twentieth-century American society…
Download free paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.9% of users find it useful
The Portrayal of Women in Susan Glaspells Jury of Her Peers
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Portrayal of Women in Susan Glaspell's Jury of Her Peers"

A Critical Analysis of the Portrayal of Women in Susan Glaspell’s “Jury of her Peers” In the story, “Jury of her Peers”, Susan Glaspell manipulates the differences between the man’s and the woman’s perspectives on a murder case to refute the traditional claim that women are intellectually incapable of doing detective jobs. She effectively uses ironies and mystery to depict women’s ability to differ between right and wrong. Also by upholding these differences between male and female perspectives, she attempts to show that women are also capable of planning and, finally, of executing their plans. Defying the stereotypical view about women’s frivolity, Susan shows that women are more capable of doing investigation than their male counterparts. Indeed, she tries to prove that a woman’s perspective is fastidious and pickier because of their nature. So, women can focus more on the tidbits and trifles of a case, whereas man seems to overlook them. Also because of a communal understanding among women, a woman can understand another woman’s motif behind an action. Susan Glaspell depicts the female characters, in the story, who possesses intelligence which is sharper than that of their male counterparts (Makowsky 35). Susan Glaspell shows that a female perspective is more capable of perceiving another woman’s psychology. In the story, the female characters feel strong affinity for the main suspect, Minnie. A communal feeling leads to Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters to the discovery that Minnie has lived a miserable life in Wrights’ household. Such communal fervor among the women is evident in Mrs. Hale’s speech: “ I might 'a' known she needed help! I tell you, it's queer, Mrs. Peters. We live close together, and we live far apart. We all go through the same things--it's all just a different kind of the same thing! If it weren't--why do you and I understand? Why do we know--what we know this minute?” (Glaspell, “Jury of her Peers”) They simply discover the rift in Minnie’s relationship with her husband from the dead-bird clue. But the Sheriff and his team fail to discover it. Though they know little about the Wrights’ marital life, the little dead bird helps them to construe Minnie’s oppressed presence in her household. In this regard, David Rachel comments, “Though Martha and Mrs. Peters know little about the Wrights’ marriage, they know enough about the naturalistic weight of patriarchy to intuit the details that the dead bird suggests” (pars.4). The female investigators are aware of the fact that though they live in different households, their fates are almost the same. They know that their fate is wrought at the hands of their male counterparts. Whereas, for the male investigators, the bird is a mere little thing, Martha and others know that it is a symbol of freedom and of possession. Since Mr. Wright has, supposedly, killed the bird, he not only snatches Minnie’s freedom but also deprives her of any material possession. Minnie can, no more, bear such bandit life. As a result, she murders her husband to procure freedom. Susan shows that men’s superiority complex creates a major flaw in their perspective. On the other hand, women’s obsession with trifles provides them with a better perception about things. In the story, Susan draws a clear dichotomy between male and psychologies. The female characters are found to be more obsessed with trifles or minor details of the Wright-case. The women discover, by investigating into the trifles, what the male characters fail. Indeed, the trifles ultimately appear to be of major significance. In the following conversation, Sherriff and County Attorney make fun of the women’s obsession with the trifles: Mrs. Peters' husband broke into a laugh. "Well, can you beat the women! Held for murder, and worrying about her preserves!" The young attorney set his lips. "I guess before we're through with her she may have something more serious than preserves to worry about." "Oh, well," said Mrs. Hale's husband, with good-natured superiority, "women are used to worrying over trifles." (Glaspell, “Jury of Her Peers”) Sherriff comments that women are frivolous, while County Attorney opines that women’s obsession with things like “dirty towels” is built in their nature. Indeed, Susan handles the male characters to represent typical patriarchal perception about women. Indeed, this patriarchy-induced image of a woman is heavily infused with feminine psychophysical inferiority to masculinity. Suzy Clarkson Holstein comments on Susan’s women’s capability of perceiving the truth about an event: “Their method from the very beginning of the story leads not only to the discovery that eludes the men, but also to their ultimate moral choice, a choice which radically separates them from the men” (Holstein 282) But ironically, the women appear to more competent in discovering and, subsequently, hiding the truth about the Wright case. Susan shows that, in a patriarchal society, the male perspective is flawed within itself because of the superiority complex it cherishes in its heart. In the story, men’s perception about women is quite different from the women’s perception about themselves. The County Attorney argues that if Minnie were a good housewife, she would have keep clothes dirty. Since Minnie has not fulfilled her duty to her husband, she is the culprit. In fact, referring the dirty towels, the County Attorney attempts to prove Minnie’s involvement in the murder. But Mrs. Hale refuted County’s claim, arguing that a woman, who used to work on the farm, might not have enough time to take care of dirty towels, as she claims, “There's a great deal of work to be done on a farm” (Glaspell, “Jury of Her Peers”). Mr. Hale’s supposition that “women are used to worrying over trifles” reveals that the early twentieth century patriarchy would consider women’s job as trifles. In this regard, Baker Rambles comments that Susan shows how women were used to being out in the field as well, performing manual labor and possibly being paid by their own husbands for minimal wages, just enough to get by with food and basic necessities, a allowance more so than a paycheck (pars.1). The story reveals that the women’s perception of their indoor and outdoor labor is in complete contrast with their society’s perception. In the meantime, such male notion about women’s manual jobs and women’s aptitude proves to be ironical too. In fact, one of the ironies of the story is the men’s failure to perceive the importance of the trifles in the investigation process. Mrs. Hale admits the significance of ordinary things in the inquiry as following: “I don't see as there's anything so strange,….our taking up our time with little things while we're waiting for them to get the evidence. I don't see as it's anything to laugh about” (Glaspell, “Jury of Her Peers”). In a man’s eye, a woman’s kitchen jobs do not deserve much attention. Sherriff and other male characters’ disapproving remarks about Minnie’s kitchen are obvious in their speeches. In a scene, the County Attorney tries to persuade his companions about the worthlessness of Minnie’s kitchen in their inquiry: “You're convinced that there was nothing important here – nothing that would point to any motive” (Glaspell, “Jury of Her Peers”). Here Susan’s proposition about the difference between male and female perspectives is clearly remarkable. Mrs. Peter and Mrs. Hale are engaged in what the Sherriff and his companions decline to put proper emphasis on, and their instinctual obsession with the trifles in the kitchen leads to the discovery of the motif behind the murder. Susan’s story, “Jury of her Peers” renders an obvious dichotomy between male and female perspectives. Primarily Susan tells how women’s view is different from that of the man. Meanwhile, her story tells about male oppression, domination and women’s subservient position in the early twentieth century American society. But at the same time, it proves women’s superiority in particular areas of life. In contradiction to the male investigators’ judgment that women are good for nothing, their female assistants quite successfully discover the clues and motive behind the murder of John Wright. Eventually they develop a moral ground in order to support the suspect Minnie Wright whom they found to be the victim of male oppression in John household. In her era, Susan’s “Jury of her Peers” was indeed a challenge to the academic assumption that women are incapable to discovering facts because of their reproductive psychology, as Baker Rambles says, “One psychologist from the early 1900’s, Dr. G. Staneley Hall, a very gender biased individual believed that if women were given power, then proper research would be tainted because of their reproductive capabilities” (2). Opposing her contemporary society’s view about women’s physical and intellectual inferiority to men, Susan’s women show evidence of superior intelligence unlike men’s fight or flight decision. Works Cited Glaspell, Susan. Jury of Her Peers. Learner.org. 22 March, 2013. available at http://www.learner.org/interactives/literature/story/fulltext.html New York: Twayne, Holstein, Suzy Clarkson. “Silent Justice in a Different Key: Glaspell's 'Trifles.'” Midwest Quarterly 44.3 (Spring 2003): 282. Print. Makowsky, Veronica. Susan Glaspell's Century of American Women: A Critical Interpretation of Her Work. New York: Oxford UP, 1993. Rachels, David. Story Note: Susan Glaspell, "A Jury of Her Peers" (1917). 22 March, 2013. available at http://noirboiled.blogspot.com/2011/04/story-note-susan-glaspell-jury-of-her.html Rambles, Baker. Trifles Analysis. Hubpage. Web. 24 April, 2012. Read More
Tags
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Jury of her Peers Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Jury of her Peers Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/literature/1471448-jury-of-her-peers
(Jury of Her Peers Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Jury of Her Peers Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/literature/1471448-jury-of-her-peers.
“Jury of Her Peers Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/literature/1471448-jury-of-her-peers.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Portrayal of Women in Susan Glaspell's Jury of Her Peers

A Critical Analysis of the Portrayal of Women in Susan Glaspell's Trifles

A Critical Analysis of the portrayal of women in susan glaspell's “Trifles” In her play, “Trifles,” Susan Glaspell manipulates ironies and mystery genre to portray women capable of perceiving right and wrong, planning accordingly and finally of executing their plans by destabilizing the patriarchy-induced stereotypical notion of women's frivolity and frailty.... (Glaspell, “Trifles”) This dialogue depicts how in the early 20th century men thought of the women in their households....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

A Jury of Her Peers

Reaction Paper on the Short Story “A jury of her peers” by Susan Glaspell Susan Glaspell was an eminent American novelist, playwright, actor and director of the twentieth century.... This is a reaction paper based on one of her most noted works ‘A jury of her peers,' which was “written in 1917” (Techniques of Critical Analysis, p.... Reaction Paper on the Short Story “A jury of her peers” by Susan Glaspell Susan Glaspell was an eminent American novelist, playwright, actor and director of the twentieth century....
3 Pages (750 words) Assignment

Questions & Response Paper

Full name Professor Subject Date Understanding “A jury of her peers” Susan Glaspell is a wonderful storyteller who has a style of her own that makes her readers drawn to her narrations.... In “A jury of her peers”, Glaspell causes her readers to think about the following questions: a) Why did the author choose the title?... Full Understanding “A jury of her peers” Susan Glaspell is a wonderful storyteller who has a style of her own that makesher readers drawn to her narrations....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Analysis of Trifles by Susan Glaspell

American women in the 19th century were deterred from lustrous careers and they were denied self-independence by the men.... Women did not have the right to vote or sit as members of the jury.... glaspell's experience at the time inspired the obsession with the 19th century culture-bound concepts of gender roles in American society.... The author analyzes the play "Trifles" by susan Glaspell which is based on a true murder event that occurred during the time she worked as a reporter in Iowa....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Trifles ( A Play) by Susan Glaspell

“Law, Justice, and Female Revenge in ‘Kerfol', by Edith Wharton, and Trifles and ‘A jury of her peers', by Susan Glaspell.... The characters and events in susan glaspell's Trifles help describe the discrimination that American men afforded their women during the time when the play was written. ... The characters and events in susan glaspell's Trifles help describe the discrimination that American men afforded their women during the time when the play was written....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The Elements of Drama in Works of Susan Glaspell

The key difference between both her works, Trifles and A jury of her peers is the way the stories are portrayed.... Trifles is a play and A jury of her peers is a short story.... On the other hand, A jury of her peers, the short story, is developed from the play and is loved by readers because it has greater information than Trifles (Glaspell 1028).... The key difference between both her works, Trifles and A jury of her peers is the way the stories are portrayed....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Plays and Short Stories by Susan Glaspell

Also, among her popular works is the short story, the jury by her peers, which she authored after the play.... The main difference is in the title of the two, 'trifles' and 'the jury by her peers'.... For 'the jury by her peers' the title gives out a sense of feminism from the pronoun 'her'.... The sadness of women inferiority and the ideology of women getting to understand each other.... The word jury in the title signifies the judgment Mrs Wright gets from the women, judgment from within, in that the women understand why her act was justifiable....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Analysis of the Play Trifles by Susan Glaspell

Trifles were made into a short story 'A jury of her peers' one year after it was staged.... So they ignore the suggestions of women while dealing with important issues.... So they ignore the suggestions of women while dealing with important issues.... As they leave the kitchen they ask the two ladies Mrs Peter's and Mrs Hale to carefully examine the room for clues while collecting Mrs Wright's clothes that had to be handed over to her in the prison....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us