A Comparison and Contrast of an Engineer and a Fine Artist in Terms of Globalisation - Essay Example

Mapping the Post-Modern Name of Student Student Number Institution Course Code Name of Lecturer Submission Date Mapping the Postmodern: A Comparison and Contrast of an Engineer and a Fine Artist in terms of Globalisation Globalisation has brought up great changes even to the professional world with practitioners being faced with new working conditions in the postmodern era. Culture, knowledge, relations of power and discourse has been established in the growth and development relating to the modernist drive (Martin 2002). The engineers have faced tremendous changes with globalisation as technology has literary changed the perspective of their functioning. On the other hand, the face of a fine artist has been enhanced by globalisation with respect to improving their display and making the flow of their artistic scenes more appealing. In context, this essay builds an argumentative study of the two practitioners with respect to the theme of globalisation with a postmodernist perspective. The context of postmodern practitioner refers to the one who aims at developing, coming up with better avenues than the past and step over any remaining boundaries and come up with new features complimenting the present (Horsfield 2000). Postmodern aspects have affected the two practitioners under consideration to a large extent with globalisation soaring the growth and development to realise a new level working ground. The height of globalisation has been evidenced with immense growth and development in the professional world proving the modernist perspective with the coming up of maps and visual contexts enhanced by technology (Korsunsky 2010). This has brought up the realisation of three-dimensional visualisation and enabled the engineers to have their architectural plans and maps on soft copy in the dimension they please. Consequently, the fine artists have realised animated and live visualisation with the same technology (Seppa 2010). These aspects clearly illustrate the stakes therein taken by postmodern practitioners in their quest to turn the tables of norm and come up with different styles of doing things. The styles embraced are in contrast to what the modernists termed new or innovations and have now been out-dated (Pan 2005). Many have appreciated the perspectives of postmodern with respect to assisting the required paradigm shift or transformation in their area of interest and specialisation (Clarke 2003). One notable comparison with both practitioners is their unperturbed desire comes up with intense sense of personal social responsibility and challenges the current state instead of maintaining the status quo. Postmodernism has been intertwined with other aspects like feminism, post-structuralism, post colonialism and neo-Marxism to challenge the conduct of status quo (Mumby 1997). These are via identifying and challenging the oppressing situations with respect to their profession and face them directly to come up with solutions. Consequently, face the fact that they have to earn to recognise and challenge the assumptions that are fundamentally the basis to capitalism and inequality. The society we are living in is changing tremendously where events and innovations within the engineering as well as the expectations coming out of the whole aspect resulting from globalisation (Pan 2005). In the postmodern engineering perspective, their aim is to solve the many challenges people are facing in life by creating workable and manageable solutions. A number of reports have indicated that the recent pasts have brought up globalisation factor within the engineering and the practitioners therein have a mandate to attend to the changes (Korsunsky 2010). A good example pertains to the 21st century engineer showing a clear example of the stake of globalisation on engineering as a profession. With the changes experienced, it evident to note that the understanding of globalisation by an engineering practitioner is imperative for the success of the practitioner in the current global society. In context, globalisation entails the ability to comprehend the way the global economy is changing and its connection to the triggered technology (Pan 2005). With respect to fine arts as a profession, globalisation calls for the embracing and understanding of cultures within the changing society and how to appeal the end audience or customer (Galenson 2009). This is in respect to the advanced technology that has enabled many people around the world to access entertainments via technology. This maps fine artists at a position where they have to balance the global culture as their audience is vast and elaborate. Globalisation has enhanced the recognition and comprehension of issues of sustainability, and understands the importance of transparency in the course of working with the society and eventually understands policy issues globally (Martin 2002). This is crucial to ascertain the changes occurring and establish a ground to develop their career with the changing environment. Consequently, it is critical to note that the fundamental capacities termed are critical to the 21st century engineers and fine artists to grow into professionals with the capacity to perform effectively and their local capacity and impact globally (Seppa 2010). Technical growth has not only influenced the practitioners per se, but it has consequently stimulated economic growth and development in the modern society. This is directly related to the trend of the practitioners in their tasks and the training they have embraced to fully understand the advent of globalisation and how to cope (Clarke 2003). Generally, globalisation has redefined the nature of the pedagogy entrenched in engineering and fine arts professions. It has redefined the environment of the practitioners work and making them more interdependent to the upcoming technology in the advent of globalisation. With global environment that is changing in the technical and corporate sectors, the practitioners are required to work as part of global teams to come up with solutions that will impact on global avenues. Globalisations has elevated the platform of working, as well as improved the delivery of services at the expense of the available concepts of postmodernism (Clarke 2003). The solutions sought by engineers are implemented across national borders, with fine arts impacting on the cultural boundaries. The latter improves the pictorial depiction of nature and the solutions sought. Nevertheless, the features presented by fine artists are for aesthetic and recreational purposes (Galenson 2009) unlike the engineers who come up with phenomena to give solutions. In context, the engineers as technical professionals consider the implications of their solutions prior to coming with them at the contexts of other national interest (Korsunsky 2010). On the other hand, the fine artists consider the impression they will make to their clients. This brings up the aspect of being competitive and engineers approach it with the target of gaining appreciation and the fine artist with the appreciation of understanding other cultures and geographical settings. This clearly presents the notion of modern knowledge-based society creating professionals who can learn and analyse, and eventually come up with innovations that have direct impacts to the society (Horsfield 2000). In the course of modern era, there have been important artists who have emerged from various places with the postmodern era being graced with increased diversity of innovative artists (Galenson 2009). The proliferation of artistic centres with the growing number of nationalities that are evident, it is clear that globalisation has taken great effect upon the field of fine arts. There are crucial aspects that present themselves with respect to globalisation and advancement of art in the era of technology (Pan 2005). These have critically presented the enhanced diffusion of artistic innovation that has been promoted with competition within and beyond, due to the exposure brought about by globalisation and technology. With time, there have been new and artistic techniques and styles spreading rapidly and widely all over the world than it were before (Seppa 2010). This increased diffusion can be attributed to the consequential increasingly conceptual nature within advanced art in the past. Generally, globalisation in advanced fine arts relates to the aspect of spreading innovations and creativity, geographic diffusion of great and new techniques and styles. The key to comprehending the speed of growth and development of globalisation in the field of arts lies in the recognition of the crucial forms of contacts that are available and where artists can differ (Galenson 2009). This is respect to nature of art work under consideration, as well as the target audience or clients. The utilisation of actual theoretical features on globalisation and aesthetic pluralisation creates an avenue for investigation by the artist, concerning the manner of serving the challenging existing in the aesthetic theory within the contemporary visual arts (Seppa 2010). This is in respect to critical consideration of the transformations in the profession, and is also clear to note that globalisation of arts still retains the ancient power structures. The major reason behind this is to present and retain the decency and originality of the visual artistic work presented. In conclusion, it is clear to note that globalisation is an aspect that has come out clearly in the postmodern aspect of professional world. It is evident that the impact made by globalisation to the two analysed postmodern practitioners is immense. The engineers and fine artists present clear comparisons and variations with respect to ensuring growth and development within their professions, as far as globalisation is concerned. The study has clearly outlined both practitioners with respect to the theme of globalisation in the mapping for postmodernism by creating an argument showing a clear contrast and comparison. Reference List Clarke, A. E., 2003. Situational Analyses: Grounded Theory Mapping After the Postmodern Turn. Symbolic Interaction, Vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 553-576. California: University of California Press. Galenson, D., 2009. The Globalisation of Advanced art in the Twentieth Century, In Conceptual Revolutions in Twentieth-century Art, London: Cambridge University Press. Horsfield, B., 2000. Communications and the Postmodern Organisation: A report of qualitative Research on Australian Special Air Service Regime. Electronic Journal of Communication, Vol. 10, no. 1, 2. Korsunsky, A., 2010. Globalisation, Networking and Engineering. Proceedings of the International Multi-conference of Engineers and computer Scientists. Vol. III. IMECS 2010, March 17-19, 2010, Hong Kong. Martin, J., 2002. Organisational Culture: Mapping the Terrain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Mumby, D., 1997. Modernism, Postmodernism and Communication Studies: A Reading of an On-going Debate. Management Communication Quarterly. Vol. 7, pp. 1-28. Pan, E., 2005. Globalisation and your Career, IEEE Engineering Management Review, Vol. 33, no. 4. Pp. 3-6. Seppa, A., 2010. Globalisation and the Arts: The Rise of New Democracy, or Just another Pretty Suit for the Old Emperor? Journal of Aesthetics & Culture. Vol. 2, pp. 1-25. DOI: 10.3402/jac.v2i0.5410. Read More

A number of reports have indicated that the recent pasts have brought up globalisation factor within the engineering and the practitioners therein have a mandate to attend to the changes (Korsunsky 2010). A good example pertains to the 21st century engineer showing a clear example of the stake of globalisation on engineering as a profession. With the changes experienced, it evident to note that the understanding of globalisation by an engineering practitioner is imperative for the success of the practitioner in the current global society.

In context, globalisation entails the ability to comprehend the way the global economy is changing and its connection to the triggered technology (Pan 2005). With respect to fine arts as a profession, globalisation calls for the embracing and understanding of cultures within the changing society and how to appeal the end audience or customer (Galenson 2009). This is in respect to the advanced technology that has enabled many people around the world to access entertainments via technology. This maps fine artists at a position where they have to balance the global culture as their audience is vast and elaborate.

Globalisation has enhanced the recognition and comprehension of issues of sustainability, and understands the importance of transparency in the course of working with the society and eventually understands policy issues globally (Martin 2002). This is crucial to ascertain the changes occurring and establish a ground to develop their career with the changing environment. Consequently, it is critical to note that the fundamental capacities termed are critical to the 21st century engineers and fine artists to grow into professionals with the capacity to perform effectively and their local capacity and impact globally (Seppa 2010).

Technical growth has not only influenced the practitioners per se, but it has consequently stimulated economic growth and development in the modern society. This is directly related to the trend of the practitioners in their tasks and the training they have embraced to fully understand the advent of globalisation and how to cope (Clarke 2003). Generally, globalisation has redefined the nature of the pedagogy entrenched in engineering and fine arts professions. It has redefined the environment of the practitioners work and making them more interdependent to the upcoming technology in the advent of globalisation.

With global environment that is changing in the technical and corporate sectors, the practitioners are required to work as part of global teams to come up with solutions that will impact on global avenues. Globalisations has elevated the platform of working, as well as improved the delivery of services at the expense of the available concepts of postmodernism (Clarke 2003). The solutions sought by engineers are implemented across national borders, with fine arts impacting on the cultural boundaries.

The latter improves the pictorial depiction of nature and the solutions sought. Nevertheless, the features presented by fine artists are for aesthetic and recreational purposes (Galenson 2009) unlike the engineers who come up with phenomena to give solutions. In context, the engineers as technical professionals consider the implications of their solutions prior to coming with them at the contexts of other national interest (Korsunsky 2010). On the other hand, the fine artists consider the impression they will make to their clients.

This brings up the aspect of being competitive and engineers approach it with the target of gaining appreciation and the fine artist with the appreciation of understanding other cultures and geographical settings. This clearly presents the notion of modern knowledge-based society creating professionals who can learn and analyse, and eventually come up with innovations that have direct impacts to the society (Horsfield 2000). In the course of modern era, there have been important artists who have emerged from various places with the postmodern era being graced with increased diversity of innovative artists (Galenson 2009).

Read More