Author Tutor Course Date Compare and Contrast Trifles and A jury of her peers Susan Glaspell, a renowned writer and journalist, is the author behind Trifles and A jury of Her Peers. The two plays capture the attention of the reader; as they introduce one to the outstanding talent held by the author…
The latter can be regarded as an adaptation of the former. After exploring the two works, the reader can evidently realize that there are certain differences, as well as similarities that exist in the works (Gainor 42). In this regard, this paper will compare and contrast the two works, giving similarities and differences that are existent in the works. Similarities and differences between Trifles and A jury of her peers While “Trifles” is the original play written by the author, “A jury of Her Peers” can be regarded as a short story, which is a rewriting of the play. The story can be classified as narrative when compared to the play. Although the two works have the similar characters, the story gives the reader a chance to know the feelings, emotions, as well as thoughts of the characters. This means that the play describes the characters narrowly while the story goes in depth in the description of the characters (Gainor 42). The other way in which the two works can be contrasted is with regard to the way males and females tend to be characterized. There are differences in the author’s depiction of both male and female characters in the play and the story. In the story, men can be said to have more depth than in the play. This emanates from the fact that there is in depth explanation of the male characters in the story as compared to the play. Actors had to decide how they will depict gender in the play; on the other hand, depiction of gender in the short story is based on the author’s interpretation of the play. In this regard, therefore, it can be argued that there is more detailed explanation of characters (especially with regard to aspects of gender) in the story than in the play. The other difference between the short story and the play is that the story gives a clearer and in depth discussion of how the main characters relate to each other; this is not evident from the play. For example, the short story depicts the relationship that exists between Mr. and Mrs. Hale with a lot of clarity. From the story, it becomes possible to get how the characters feel towards each other and their reaction towards one another’s behaviour. However, this is not evident in the play. The play does not give the reader any room for interpreting the behaviour of the characters. Thus, it is not possible to come to the realization why characters behave in certain ways (Gainor 43). The other difference between the two works is that the story brings out the issue of male dominance with a lot of clarity than the play. In the story, it is possible to gain an understanding of the various ways in which men dominate women and exercise authority towards them. This is not so in the play; as “Trifles” does not go deeply into the heart of the matter. The short story also explains the reactions and response of females towards domination by men; on the contrary, it is not possible to know how women react towards women from the play. There also exists a difference between the play and the short story in that the play involves a performance, which can be regarded as live. This means that the audience has little control regarding what happens. On the other hand, there are lots of interruptions in the short story since ambiguity enables the reader to think outside the box (Gainor 44). Apart from the differences that exist between these two works, there are also some similarities ...
Cite this document
(“Trifles and A Jury of Her Peers Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/107457-trifles-and-a-jury-of-her-peers
(Trifles and A Jury of Her Peers Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Trifles and A Jury of Her Peers Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/107457-trifles-and-a-jury-of-her-peers.
According to the research findings, it can, therefore, be said that in contrast to the play the story’s title “A Jury of Her Peers” uses legal language to point out that the peers of Mrs. Wright are not the sheriff, the attorney and assembled male jurors, but in fact women like herself who can understand the pressures she has suffered in her life.
However, as the play progresses, one gets a glimpse of how men and women in America in the early 20th century would define their roles according to their gender. Gender is the major determining force that governed men and women in the past and it may still be true at present.
With that said, a close look will be taken into the male and female perspectives of Susan Glaspell’s Trifles to highlight the parallel between the two perspectives and illustrate the means by which women, in attempting to thrive in a patriarchal society, might make choices that defame their gender.
She effectively uses ironies and mystery to depict women’s ability to differ between right and wrong. Also by upholding these differences between male and female perspectives, she attempts to show that women are also capable of planning and, finally, of executing their plans.
Two men, the Sheriff, and the County Attorney open the play, which is set in the socio-economic upheavals of the patriarchal American society in the wake of the 20th century (Al-Khalili 132), and the plot of the story revolves around an investigation of the murder of John Wright.
The characters and events in Susan Glaspell’s Trifles help describe the discrimination that American men afforded their women during the time when the play was written.
First of all, the female characters in the play are addressed only as “Mrs” followed by their
The titles “A Jury and Her Peers” and “Trifles” insinuates the focus that the play and the book takes. The play “trifles” focuses more on the objects especially the objects used to judge Foster. One can observe that each episode has a particular
Alkalay-Gut in her article “Jury of Her Peers: The Importance of Trifles” has emphasized that the wide gap between male and female perceptions constructs the bedrock of A Jury of Her Peers. The story surpasses
Also, among her popular works is the short story, the jury by her peers, which she authored after the play. The two are very similar in terms of the characters and the story which is a continuation from the play. The play and short story however differ in some way
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Trifles and A Jury of Her Peers for FREE!