Instructor Course Submission date The book Marriage Morals by Bertrand Russell This essay seeks to analyze issues discussed in family research council and compare or contrast them with Bertrand Russell perceptions in his novel “Marriage Morals”…
It contests and lobbies against LGBT rights, divorce, abortion, embryonic stem-cell study and pornography. Marriage and Morals is an old book written by philosopher Bertrand Russell, and that questions the Victorian perceptions of morality concerning marriage and sex (Russell 2). Contrast issues The Liberation of Women: chapter seven of the book advocates for women liberty; however, the approaches contrasts the morals the title claim. The chapter claims that the sex education provided by many books is insufficient to curb immorality. The only fixation that will suffice is to eliminate from young women all chances of being by themselves with men: girls must be prohibited to make their living by work outside the residence; they should never be permitted an outing unless in a company of their mother or an aunt; the unfortunate practice of going to boogies without a chaperon ought to be sternly stamped out. The book suggest that to avoid immorality of unmarried women there should be a monthly medical checkup carried out by police doctors and these doctors preferably castrated, and non-virgins to be sent to penitentiary(Russell 82). The chapter continue to suggest that the use of contraceptives and talking to unmarried women to be prohibited. The author asserts that if this is carried out for several years then the tide of immorality will be curbed. The concept is comparable with FRC effort to make women free from oppression; however, the approach differs. FRC has processes to encourage women freedom in a more humane manner as contrasted to suggestion that the book provides. It supports a federal ethics clause, permitting medical employees to refuse to give certain treatments to their clients, such as procurement of abortion, blood transfusion or birth control. It also supports for abstinence- and encourages sex education, intelligent design and entreaty in public schools, and the control of pornography and other "obscene, profane, indecent, or program on broadcast and cable television (Stange 510). In both cases, there is advocacy for restriction; however, the approaches differ. The book suggestions are not liberty related they are a different form of oppression of women in pretext of curbing immorality. The book gives a presumption that immorality can be controlled through restriction of women activities. Sex Morality: Chapter 8 of the book discuses the taboo on sex knowledge, it claims that frank pornography would do less damage if it were open and unashamed than it does when it is rendered interesting by secrecy and stealth(Russell 89). This is contrary to FRC stand on pornography since it is against it and advocates for the control of pornography and other indecent, obscene, profane, or program on broadcast and cable television. The book argues that the taboo against nudity is an obstruction to a decent approach on the topic of sex. It proposes that it is in order for children to observe each other and their parents nude when it so happens naturally. There will be a short time, most likely at about three years of age, when the youngster is fascinated in the dissimilarity between the mother and the father, and compares them with the variances between themselves and other siblings, but this stage is soon ended, and subsequent to this they take no more interest in nakedness than in clothes. This is a contrasting fact with FRC stands that condemns any form of obscenity (Stange 510). The book considered homosexuality to be immoral when it ...
Cite this document
(“The book Marriage Morals by Bertrand Russell Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/107564-the-book-marriage-morals-by-bertrand-russell
(The Book Marriage Morals by Bertrand Russell Essay)
“The Book Marriage Morals by Bertrand Russell Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/107564-the-book-marriage-morals-by-bertrand-russell.
The intentions of this study are morals, the rules of conduct and the moral sense directs an individual to act in the right or the wrong manner. However, even individuals with the moral sense can be tempted to act against the morals but then it is known as ‘going against their nature’. This implies that the very nature of human beings is to be good; therefore morals are inherent.
In the late 19th and early 20th century marriage was not something that women really looked forward to. In fact, initially marriage had been a largely patriarchal institution although feminist group did try to bring about reforms for the women to be able to have certain rights after their marriage.
Russell became the very first African American to be an NBA coach something that had never happened in the history of the United States. A major pace setter and a performer per excellence, Klein put it that Russell splendid career set standards against whom everybody will be judged (Murray 35-36).
To this he gave the very famous, but obnoxious, reply: “Not enough evidence, God! Not enough evidence!” This kind of atheism is called evidential atheism. Although Russell talked about there not being enough evidence it is not clear what it is not enough for – whether to convince someone about the existence of God or for some other reason.
They are distinct individuals; separate personalities, born, bred and brought up in varying circumstances who try to come together from the day of the marriage, if it is a traditional marriage, or from the day they came into contact with each other, progressed through courtship and that relationship later fructified into marriage.
If, as the argument goes, there has not been a fundamental alteration of what it means for two people to be married, then the institution of marriage is one that is, indeed, sacrosanct, and should not be re-examined. However, as this essay shows, marriage, as an institution, has evolved, and is continuing to evolve, which means that the institution can evolve in the direction of equality, without too much concern.
Well versed in religious and historical information pertaining to Christian belief this book based upon heaven and its religious, philosophical and scientific variations.
He shows us how heaven is where God is, love is, and subsists and
The author also discussed how that one little girl when he was younger refused his card because he was black. It was then that he realized that he was a person who was different. For a bit of the time, he felt like he was shut out from the others but
Russell is an argumentative Tom; as such he does not know anything about the human spirit except to argue.
My response: Though I am not working now in the professional sense of the term, I have great fascination to shape into a hard and
Russell’s argument is of the vein that studying philosophy is an end in itself. Many fields in science offer us technical knowledge to enhance our material comforts. But this cannot be the sole objective of our
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The book Marriage Morals by Bertrand Russell for FREE!