The core reason of censorship is not restraining expression of people, but to protect them. Some of the advantages can be avoidance of plagiarism, restriction of vulgar and obscene materials, hiding sensitive military data from enemy states and so on. However, opponents of censorship argue on many elements like human rights are violated and excessive control is exerted on people’s fundamental freedom of expression. This paper discusses about censorship of children’s books with special focus on banning of The Giver by Lois Lowry. Censorship of children’s books Arguments Censorship can be more accurately defined as “government restriction or legislation of materials, including the banning of books” (Hintz & Tribunella, 429). In other words, censorship is restriction imposed by a governing authority over the access of contents of a book according to the age and status of the intended readers (Hintz & Tribunella, 430). There is a significant role of censorship and selection in the books meant for children and young adults. Censorship of children’s books happens when an entire book or a portion of it is considered inappropriate for children or young adults, and decision is taken by appropriate authorities to prevent children from reading it. Those who advocate censorship consider this as a necessary step to exert control over books and literature that are especially written for children and young adults so that they are not exposed to vulgar or adult stuff. These supporters of censorship believe that certain ideas and expressions need to be controlled that have the potential to corrupt the young minds. Moreover, by censoring books, writers promoting racism and sexist ideas can be curbed. Also, books are censored to avoid children from seeing unwanted stuff like photographs portraying violence. Those who oppose censorship believe that this practice violates the right to free expression by the Americans, which is agreed by the U.S. constitution. These people believe that a single group assigned with the task of making decisions on censorship does not have the right to decide on behalf of everyone that what books or parts of books are inappropriate for children and young adults. Opponents of censorship argue that it is the responsibility of parents to decide on their children’s behalf what they can or cannot read. They also assert that it is not right to criticize materials for the simple reason that they are ahead of time (Magoon, 8-11). Impact of negative reading Censorship of children’s books arises from the concept that children and young adults should be separate from the world of adults. Children are considered as innocent and should not be exposed to the pressures and vagaries of adulthood. Texts and pictures are considered as adult materials when they are deemed inappropriate to be seen by children and young adults like books on the subjects of violence, racism, sexuality, drug use, social upheaval and political controversy. Such books are often banned in its entirety or else chapters containing such materials are banned from publication in order to protect the innocence of childhood. The importance of censorship of children’s books lies in the fact that young readers get negatively affected by violent and provocative ideas or images they find in a text. It cannot be denied that works of literature can adversely affect children and
Cite this document
(“Censorship of Childrens Books: The Giver by Lois Lowry Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/108045-censorship-of-childrens-books-the-giver-by-lois-lowry
(Censorship of Childrens Books: The Giver by Lois Lowry Essay)
“Censorship of Childrens Books: The Giver by Lois Lowry Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/108045-censorship-of-childrens-books-the-giver-by-lois-lowry.
Cited: 0 times
The very concept of censorship opposes the fundamental freedom of speech, thoughts and ideas. In general, all kinds of communication are limited to some extent because people censor themselves before deciding what to write in a letter or a book…
It also involves the surveillance, supervision and control of information or ideas that are promulgated in the society. Censorship has always been a hot topic of debate all over the world. It has remained a topic of heated discussions over the course of history.
It was not until 1966 that the book was finally released to the public as its content was determined to be irrelevant and unsurprising. Since the banning of Cleland’s novel, censorship has been used to protect people from improper media according to the standards of the government and smaller organizations that focus on censorship, though this has sparked the issue of how much censorship is too much censorship.
hip is far more complicated than one person refusing to let another read or watch or listen to something. The sad, sorry history of the protests against the making and the release of The Last Temptation of Christ should stand as a shining example of how attempts at censorship almost always result in the opposite of the intended effect in the short run, though in the long run the intentions of those who desired to suppress the expression of free speech ultimately were realized.
The car began driving back to the Ceremony, as if fate had different plans for the captives that day. But Jonas had spent too much time wanting to get out, and was not going to let this stand in his way. Breaking down the back car door, with the car still in motion, the Giver and Jonas slipped out.
The text says “mischief” (Maurice S., pp 7) and the picture shows what kind of mischief. The second picture shows him running with a fork behind the dog. The photograph on the wall also depicts a face that is very devilish. It
portray Native Americans positively but only portray stereotypes of the “savage noble” is just as damaging to the perception of youth who read these books as those who read books depicting “dangerous savages.”
It is interesting to consider the case of the Little House
ve topics, harmful behaviors or inconvenient practices in which these practices are not allowed by the government, media outlet or any controlling body composed of the influential people in a community such as church leaders, advocates or non-government organizations. It
They both have light eyes which are rarely found in their community. The same is true with Gabriel, a sick baby being taken cared by Jonas’ family who also has light eyes. He will be released from the community if he doesn’t get better within a