StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Argument against Tax Bailouts - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
From the paper "Argument against Tax Bailouts" it is clear that what is ironic in the present life of America is that the Government is over and over held responsible for the fiscal upheavals and how the Government is irresponsible despite decreasing the deficit spending…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.2% of users find it useful
Argument against Tax Bailouts
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Argument against Tax Bailouts"

May 13, Argument against Tax Bailouts 2008 economic crises, triggered by the collapse of the subprime mortgage industry in the US, resulted in a need for massive government bailouts to prevent a sudden decline of large corporations going into bankruptcy. A bailout, is essentially, a government taking tax payer dollars and giving it to corporations on the verge of bankruptcy, as the collapse of these too big to fail corporations would not only result in job less at said company but will also impact all other corporations that have business associated with this failing company (Bezdecheck, 5).There are many advantages and disadvantages to a tax bailout, some which will be discussed in this paper. Advantages to be discussed are: bailouts are needed to ensure that big corporations whose collapse will impact several industries can survive; bailouts are a necessary economic stimulant to jump-start the shaky economy; Bailouts are essentially government loans which the corporation receiving must pay back hence, the money will be returned; Disadvantages to be discussed are: bailouts use taxpayer money, which diverts much needed funding from other government programs and institutions; bailouts are band-aid solutions as they deal with the symptoms, not the main problems and do not always work; bailouts are against the free market principals and promote an environment where big corporations can take reckless risk knowing the government will pull them out. Despite the perceived advantages, tax bailouts are a major cost to tax payers and should not be used as a solution to prevent corporations who have placed themselves in difficult positions through mismanagement. As of July 24, 2011, the United States government has handed out tax bailouts totaling well over $2.5 trillion with a commitment to provide further support of $12.2 trillion (The New York Times). These funds can be directed to improve the government’s social services and infrastructure. However, large corporations, who are at the brink bankruptcy due to mismanagement and high risk taking, will end up receiving these funds. However, some would argue that these bailouts are necessity in order to prevent limit the ripple effect from the collapse of big corporation. Bailouts are needed to ensure that big corporations whose collapse will impact several industries can survive. These too big to fail corporations, if they were to collapse the, system would not be able to hold up against such a significant jump in unemployment numbers. Given the cross-functional nature of corporations today, the impact would have been felt in other industries; job losses would mean a drop in consumer spending, which would impact the retail industry (as an example) and so on. In order to prevent such a ripple effect, bailouts are necessary. Bailouts are a necessary economic stimulant to jump-start the shaky economy. By implementing a bailout, government can prevent loss of jobs, which means that consumers will continue to have disposable income to spend. This will boost the industries that manufacture the goods and services thus stimulating the economy and keep it steady. Consumers without any source that provides them with disposable income, example jobs, will hold back the spending. This will cause lower retail expenditures thus resulting in slow economic growth, which can lead to a recession. Thus, to prevent such dangerous movements, the bailout is required. Bailouts are essentially government loans, which the corporation receiving must pay back hence, the money will be returned. The government has the upper hand in dictating the conditions upon which the bailout is issued. In the case of the automakers, governments, in exchange for the bailout, received an ownership stake in the company, for example General Motors, thus will receive dividends and interest once GM starts generating revenue. Part of the deal with the big corporations is that the bailout money has to be returned once the crisis has been averted and revenues began strolling in. But, there are no guarantees that the corporation will eventually become profitable as there is a possibility the corporation despite the bailout might still close down. Bailouts use taxpayer money, which diverts much needed funding from other government programs and institutions. The government has to borrow and increase overall debt in order to finance the bailout programs. This leads to cost cutting measures that must be implemented in order to halt the growing national debt. This leads to smaller budgets for other programs under the government supervision. If the bailout was not given, that same amount of monetary resources could’ve been spent strengthen the infrastructure to handle the eventual collapse of the corporation and giving an opportunity for entrepreneurs to fill in the gap left behind by the big collapse. Bailouts are Band-Aid solutions as they deal with the symptoms, not the main problems and do not always work. Despite receiving bailouts, some corporation will still go into bankruptcy, as the original problem is the mismanagement at the company that brought them to this point. A bailout will temporarily resolve the issue of having no cash however, without change in management attitude and strategies the corporation will continue to make similar mistakes thus requiring a possible continuous bailout strategy. Despite the a government bailout, General Motors still filed for bankruptcy because the money received through the bailout assistance only temporarily stalled GM’s main issue, lack of proper and reliable products and sales. Bailouts are against the free market principals and promote an environment where big corporations can take reckless risk knowing the government will pull them out. Paul Volcker stated, in front of US law makers that, government intervention into protecting the so-called “too big to fail” corporations (companies that employee large number of employees, infrastructure and assets, sends a signal to the corporate world that go ahead, take massive uncalculated risks, because the government will be ready to bail them out (Dorning, Bloomberg). This sense of a safety net boosts the corporation to continue taking further massive risks. This puts a negative pressure on taxpayers, as they will bailout corporations for their mistakes. Despite all the perceived advantages, bailouts come at a very high price. To finance the over $2.5 trillion bailout (The New York Times) the US government has had to dip into taxpayer dollars. Tax bailouts are a major cost to tax payers and should not be used as a solution to prevent corporations who have placed themselves in difficult positions through mismanagement. Tax bailouts are mere band-aid solutions that never address the critical failure of the big corporation who is in this position through countless mismanagement. Using taxpayer dollars, the government in an effort to preserve the economy. One of the most important source of revenue for many governments and especially the United States Government is that the accumulation of the American tax dollars which is not only applicable to the employees, but the corporations, employers and even the board of directors. Therefore the whole process of accumulating the tax revenue is very vital to the federal government as well as the state government. ‘Considering recent corporate bailouts, some state and federal governments subjects such as a State of Emergency or Declared Disasters is nearly the same observing the format of similarities as a United States Government ‘Bailout Corporate’ lending agreement process. Considering these are a few reasons why we as American pay taxes, our conclusive evaluation is vital that all conditions of logical management apply.’ (Reeves, Jayson. American Tax Dollar & Bailouts: 2011 Taxes, Liquidity, & Bailouts of American Business &. S.l.: Iuniverse Inc, 2011. Print.) If we take a look and observe the patterns over the last many years, it will come under our observation that the individuals residing is different American states such as Nevada , California, Iowa, Michigan, North Carolina have experienced and seen several different kinds of tax bailouts. Starting from the 1990s and going all the way to the 2000s the businesses operating in the United States of America have seen the rollercoaster ride with various ups and downs, especially in the processes of the marketing. Now taking in to consideration the small businesses of America and the economic hurdles, the issues which are faced by the government are so immense that they have caused a hurdle to the business expansion strategies. This can also be taken as an acknowledgement that the accumulation of the tax revenues within the currency has resulted in a loss. The bad times were not prevalent all the time whereas when the times were better where the American economy was prospering and reaching the sky high limits the business were also working productively together offering people the value as well as resources at the same time. Conclusively the economic crisis which hit almost all the countries on the world may was what had accelerated the fall of the subprime mortgage industry and a result the government offered the tax bailouts so that the large corporations can be given protection against running in to bankruptcy. As defined above , the government extend a helping hand towards the corporations who are at the tinge of becoming bankrupt and making losses and since these large corporations are a very important part of the American economy, therefore their bankruptcy could be too big a collapse hence the bailout is provided. The tax bailouts have several advantages such as they keep the economy going and protect the large and important corporations from going in to bankruptcy. ‘Although big financiers seem to be the pampered pets in the drama, they're needed too much; if they're not bailed out, credit flow will grind to a halt, which will hurt too many people as a side effect. This point addresses the oft-heard criticism of the bailout being little more than a shakedown using our fear of a Great Depression to make us suckers for the Manhattan-Greenwich-Hamptons circuit. Since the modern economy is held together by easy credit, punishing the big boys through letting liquidation rip would amount to playing a game of chicken with full intent to ram the rich fellow…regardless of the consequences to the rammer.’ (ESR | September 29, 2008 | Morals and hazards: Pros and cons of the bailout) Whereas on the other hand, the picture painted by the tax bailouts is not all that rosy , instead although it does move the economy and keep it from becoming stagnant , but at the same time it can also push the economy towards a very wrong direction. ‘The big financiers have been the pampered pets for too long, and the mainstream figures who say "depression…depression...depression" have been Chicken Little'ing for too long; Wall Street won't change its ways without a bloodbath, and it's time they finally got one. To continue with the chicken-game metaphor, this argument suggests that the rich fellow with his mainstream-academic passenger/supporter has been living on a bluff.’ (ESR | September 29, 2008 | Morals and hazards: Pros and cons of the bailout) Then the administration of the bailout in the hands of the ex-WallStreeters is nothing more than an adoption of nepotism. What is ironic in the present life of the America is that the Government is over and over held responsible for the fiscal upheavals and how the Government is irresponsible despite decreasing the deficit spending. The entirely reverse situation was back in the 1990s when Clinton was in power. However what completely turned the tables and reversed the situation was the terrorist attack of 9/11 , followed by the Global economic recession. Therefore had there been no 9/11 incident or the economic crisis, the Bush administration would have been very similar to that of Clinton’s. Work Cited: Bezdecheck, Bethany. Bailout!: Government Intervention in Business. New York, NY: Rosen Pub., 2011. Print. "Adding Up the Government’s Total Bailout Tab." The New York Times. The New York Times, 24 July 2011. Web. 13 May 2012. . Dorning, Mike. "- Bloomberg." - Bloomberg. Blooming, 29 Sept. 2009. Web. 13 May 2012. . ESR | September 29, 2008 | Morals and hazards: Pros and cons of the bailout http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/1008/1008bailoutprocon.htm Reeves, Jayson. American Tax Dollar & Bailouts: 2011 Taxes, Liquidity, & Bailouts of American Business &. S.l.: Iuniverse Inc, 2011. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Argument against Tax Bailouts Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Argument against Tax Bailouts Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1451235-report-of-an-argument-against-tax-bailouts
(Argument Against Tax Bailouts Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
Argument Against Tax Bailouts Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words. https://studentshare.org/english/1451235-report-of-an-argument-against-tax-bailouts.
“Argument Against Tax Bailouts Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1451235-report-of-an-argument-against-tax-bailouts.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Argument against Tax Bailouts

Where Are We with the US Recession

Though the article envisaged a downward trend by the end of the second quarter, this may be reversed in the third quarter as the consumption of the tax rebate cheques issued by the Bush government would take effect by this period.... nbsp;In the second methodology the National Bureau Economic Research uses monthly indicators from the national accounts against the variables of employment, industrial production, real sales and real income to determine the actual dates of economic cycles and this system thus becomes more inclusive of minute details than in the case of the first methodology which only considers GDP trends whose frequency is quarterly....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Housing Crisis

It made profits for its shareholders and at the same time enjoyed being exempted from tax and oversight, despite being backed by the government.... This was part of a deal by President Roosevelt.... Private lenders had shied away from making any investments in the home loan market during and shortly after the Great Depression....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

International Corporate Finance and Financial Markets

Mergers and acquisitions are happening at a fast rate and companies are either expanding or getting integrated within the bigger sharks.... hellip; The risks involved in the international business and investments are huge.... Taking the recent example of the slump in the economic statuses around the world, the recession and the losses being incurred by the Even the companies considered to be the biggest bet in the international business arena are going down with bankruptcy....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

Should the government bailout failing businesses - Argument aginst

The institutions, credited with superb ranking from the top-notch rating agencies… Though the companies affected were in private hands, yet some of them were viewed as Too-Big-To-Fail companies and the policy makers of the land used tax payers' money to save those companies from being bankrupt....
15 Pages (3750 words) Research Paper

Bonuses for Bankers

Unless he acts to limit [bonuses] to £25,000, I shall be withholding my tax payment on 31st January.... rdquo;  What has complicated the issue is that the bank is primarily owned by the British tax-payers and received massive bailout funding from the Government of Great Britain.... hellip; This paper will provide arguments for, against and neutral to the paying of big bonuses to executives and bankers.... One could present that the argument that in Scotland that if it is the case that the RBS is going to have huge losses, needs huge federal subsidies to stay afloat and is owned by the citizens/taxpayers of Great Britain than the paying out of unreasonably high executive bonuses would seem to be unjustified....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Current state of the U.S banking industry

wedish bank as an exemplar for AmericaSweden had passed a direct levy on banks to give for their own bailouts, alike to president Obama's suggestion of improving bailout money (Jan 22, 2010).... onversion of bank bailouts to equity share by the U.... nlisting small investors in bank bails outThe Whitehouse plan would give tax payers an opportunity to benefit from the bank bailout with risks (April 9 2009)Cleaning a dirty bankPublic-private investment agenda by the treasury will put in little resources to the banks....
2 Pages (500 words) Research Paper

Bailout Package and the Stimulus Packages

In the paper “Bailout Package and the Stimulus Packages,” the author focuses on the bailout package and the stimulus packages announced by the US government to provide relief to the banks and financial institutions having toxic assets on their balance sheets.... hellip; The author states that as the value of the homes depreciated and the housing market began to bottom out, banks were left with billions of dollars worth of mortgages that were foreclosed resulting in losses to the banks....
11 Pages (2750 words) Dissertation

Should the US Government Stop Corporation Bailouts

This paper, Should the US Government Stop Corporation bailouts?... nbsp;  … As the paper outlines, companies such as AIG, General Motors, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should be offered Government bailouts because they provide quality products and services for their customers along with creating numerous job opportunities for the citizens of the country.... There are some economists that are strictly against the government bailouts....
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us