Smartphones and law - Coursework Example

JUDGES ILLEGALIZES USE OF SMARTPHONE MAPS WHILE DRIVING al Affiliation) Discussion The article depicts a situation whereby a California judge has rules that the use of maps on smart phones is illegal while driving. A concerned person has questioned the rationale of the Judge owing that that he does not see any clear difference between using maps on the smart phones and texting using other mobile phones.The author presents a description of distraction as provided the New American Oxford Dictionary; a variety of activities that may create distraction to drivers are also presented by the author.

He questions whether distracted driving laws cover issues like; changing CD players, glancing at written piece of papers or even glancing at roadside advertisement billboards. He further mentions other distractive acts such as rain drops of a vehicle window or even taking a cup of coffee while driving.He later points out a case where a driver has been charged with using a Smartphone map while driving; the driver as indicated by the author appealed to the court that the use of smart phone maps was not illegal in accordance to the law.

However, the judge as depicted in the article considered the act illegal in relation to the Michigan Distracted Driving laws.Consequently, the author of the article points out a number of issues that need to be taken into consideration by legislatures when formulating traffic laws; he proposes a comprehensive approach that involves proper research before the implementation of any law. The author in the article also suggests that laws should not be formulated through unstudied opinions. BibliographyJudge rules using smartphone maps while driving illegal - CNN.com. (n.d.). CNN.com International - Breaking, World, Business, Sports, Entertainment and Video News.

Retrieved April 28, 2013, from http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/08/tech/mobile/ban-smartphone-map-apps