Instructor name Date Science, not Dogma Should be the Standard Those who claim a fundamentalist religious conviction do not accept the theory of evolution. This faction has challenged science since Charles Darwin published Origin of the Species in the mid-1800’s…
Over the past century and one-half, however, people’s opinions regarding evolution have experienced an evolution. Many religious persons today acknowledge evolution to be valid. The Pope even admitted creation and evolution are compatible. Still, there are a dwindling numbers of people who choose to stubbornly reject the science and contend that magical account of life described in the Bible is the “gospel truth.” This emotion-charged dispute usually occurs when the fundamentalists object to science being taught in school. They want the creation version of events taught alongside the scientific version as a viable alternative. Eventually, everyone will acknowledge that the matter is not subject to dispute no more than the question of a flat earth vs. round earth is debated. Unfortunately, it will take generations to achieve this reasonable goal because our society evolves extremely slowly. Creationism is not based on the scientific model. No evidence exists, nothing to test or question. It is based on the belief that a supernatural being magically created the universe including all life in it. The faithful accept this version of events without question because if they did question it they likely would cease to believe it. Science is a journey for the truth. Hypothesis is formed from observation, testing and retesting. When new information is presented the original premise is altered. Science continually tries to disprove the hypothesis or theory until the conclusion is shown as credible and irrefutable based on all available evidence. Religion readily accepts the explanations of an ancient, very superstitious and uneducated people. “Religion is based on faith that is never questioned while science is based on knowledge that is constantly questioned” (Edwards, 1980). Creationist’s first line of attack is that evolution is just a “theory” therefore unproven and unacceptable when compared to the God’s unassailable holy words. Evolution is scientifically proven by the same method scientists prove other universally held theories. Gravity is a theory. No one knows precisely how or why gravity works but we all know it does, same with evolution. Creationists require a much higher standard of proof from evolutionists than they are willing to provide. Religious fundamentalists thought the earth was flat prior to the 16th Century. In fact, since the church controlled the government at that time it was considered heresy to publically disagree with that falsity, a crime punishable by torture and/or death. However, learned people including Christopher Columbus and Queen Isabella knew better. So did Aristotle who proved the earth was round 2000 years before Columbus. (Lienhard, 1998). Science was rejected then as now by the overtly religious but even they accept the scientific evidence regarding disease, that the Devil does not cause sickness. They also, because of science, realize the sun does not revolve around a flat earth as is described in the Bible. “There are still many points of major conflict between science and religion. In each case, only one will eventually win public support. The historical record indicates that religion wins very few of these disputes” (Robinson, 2003) Darwin theorized that species adapt and change over the duration of millions of years according to new environmental conditions. He called this process natural selection. Darwin observed and recorded ...
Cite this document
(“Science, not Dogma Should Be the Standard Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/60985-writer-will-choose-the-topic
(Science, Not Dogma Should Be the Standard Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Science, Not Dogma Should Be the Standard Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/60985-writer-will-choose-the-topic.
Though more than a century and a half has passed, though a much more educated public has marveled at the wonders of scientific discoveries such as the combustion engine, the existence of dinosaurs, the atom, electronic gadgets and countless more, nearly half of American citizens refuse to acknowledge the science of biological evolution.
Intechnology,scientific knowledge is put to practical ends. This knowledge comes chiefly from mathematics and the physical sciences, and it is used in designing machinery, materials, and industrial processes. In general, this work is known as engineering, a word dating back to the early days of the Industrial Revolution, when an 'engine' was any kind of machine.
However, due to its growing use as a global language, English is employed more and more as a means of communication among non-native speakers of English (Gnutzmann, 2005, p. 24). This is why English teachers have come to encounter a variety of standard and non-standard varieties of the English language.
Standard deviation, represented by the lowercase form of the Greek letter sigma, is a statistic that tells you how tightly the data points are clustered around the mean for a given process, which in turn tells you how much variation exists. When data points are tightly clustered around the mean and the bell-shaped curve is steep, the standard deviation -- and hence the variation -- is small.
The critical evaluation of how standard costing works is very important in this paper's quest in finding proofs to support the claim of an author that standard costing is appropriate for organizations that are greatly involved in common or repetitive operation.
Language arts does not only emphasize on the correctness of the language we speak, but also teaches us the beauty of expressiveness through words. It also enhances the imagination and creation of a child by letting him compose any piece of work with words of his choice.
692). The States that have not done so rely on the Uniform Child Custody and Jurisdiction Act (UCCJEA) to support their decisions concerning the habitual residence of neonates. This Federal law comports closely with State law but
They are guidelines for use of industrial hygienists in making decision regarding safe levels of exposure to various hazards including noise found in the workplace. ACGIH’s threshold limit values (TLVs) refer to sound pressure levels and
He further illustrates that no creative school recognizes a grouping of work that is a creative success, but is not an addition to the group’s communal achievement. According to him, if we doubt, as many do, that
As opposed to the theories and analytical inference that is oftentimes drawn in other subjects, those studies that attempt to relate their findings to the reader/researcher in terms of scientific knowledge are far easier to verify due to the fact that the levels of
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Science, not Dogma Should Be the Standard for FREE!