The Paradox of Choice After Ken Robinson’s talk on the contribution of schools in killing creativity, a lot of debate on the issue has arisen among parents and teachers, students included. The talks appeared to have a bigger impression on students more than parents and teachers, initially…
Little does it nurture talent, as the developers put more emphasis on meaningless areas at the expense of personal talent development? Call it formal or informal, the system is set in such a way that little is doable by any party to make education more talent focused. As Robinson argues, every person is born with deep natural capabilities, unique in every person. However, the formal education is keen on suppressing the growth and development of these. He observes that the best way of b ringing personal development to young people is by cultivating these capabilities in an urgent, manner for economic, cultural and economic reasons. Proposing on how this can be done, he notes that dominant approaches to the said talents are the best way of nurturing talents. Marginalization of education system has transformed students to education slaves. Many people languish in silence on the extreme torture that they undergo in a curriculum that does not allow them freedom of choice. A student has to follow the system, to the later, and work hard to achieve define targets and goals. Further, Robinson extrapolates that the current form of education has terribly failed in offering answers to the specific problems that we face. Instead, it creates alternatives which barely get to answer the kind of challenges that we are faced with in life. In most countries, observes Robinson, the system is set in relevance to national policies and cultural attitudes entirely set in the past. The disadvantages of these systems are that they promote standardization, creating a narrow view of intelligence in comparison to the diverse and personal human talents. They also promote compliance whilst cultural progress and achievement depend on imaginative cultivation of creativity. Education systems are linear and rigid in change, while human talents are organic and are largely unpredictable. Thus, Robinson seeks to differ with the current system of education, arguing that it does not promote talent development. True to this, education does not give room for personal development. Students are locked in bitter disagreements with the system that has little flexibility on the importance of various subjects taught in class and their relevance in life. A closer look at the system reveals that little is done to help a student grow individually, and personally. All syllabuses are designed in line with national goals and development agendas for the country. Classes meant for recreational and personal development are given less value. What happens to the most talented students who are poor in curriculum? Few schools focus on talent. In fact, there are no government sponsored institutions to nurture talents. The few that are in existence are Non-Governmental Organizations sponsored, or others are private institutions, owned and operated by individuals who share a similar thinking with Robinson. How many schools focus on training footballers or athletes in the world? Focus shifted from purposive learning that is intended at instilling skills and behavioral change to instilling knowledge that is aimed at running the wheels of a country’s economy. It is startling how various people who have had an opportunity to develop their talents have had great careers that have subsequently catapulted them to fame and immense wealth. Gillian Lynne is an example of such people. She was a poor student in school, ...
Cite this document
(“The paradox of choice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/94826-the-paradox-of-choice
(The Paradox of Choice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“The Paradox of Choice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/94826-the-paradox-of-choice.
Two particles are called identical if the values of all their inner attributes agree. H must be so constituted that the transposition of two identical particles is defined for every vector in H (quantum case) or every phase space point in H (classical case), respectively.
In most cases, choice is made when several real options are put into consideration. As such, these choices tend to be followed by the corresponding course of action that a person regard as viable and most appropriate (Amato 2009). According to most people, making choices is an ideal thing.
Throughout generations, scientists have continued to study how the brain works and different techniques have been used to, somehow, get good resolution and timing at the same time (Voytek, “Computational Analysis”. Apart from the cellular level, scientists have also attempted to explain the behavior of individuals in terms of the influence of the changes in a person’s environment and the effects of the society to their behavior.
Since we all are waiting for some time in the 'future' to invest our savings, it is the present that can suffer. For the society collectively, a penny "saved" may not be a penny "earned." What we hold true for an individual may not be beneficial for the whole society.
Bill McKibben analyzes this phenomenon in his article "The Christian Paradox. How a faithful nation gets Jesus wrong". One of the things that unite the most the American people is their religion; if not in practice, at least in aspiration. According to McKibben, America is a place "saturated in Christian identity".
Therefore, it is possible to learn knowledge that one was not aware of or never had. I admit that there is possibility of achieving knowledge from mind is rational rather than from experience as demonstrated in the Meno’s paradox. It is
s a way of looking into how consumers achieve equilibrium between expenditure and preferences by exploring the utility as subject to consumer budgetary constraints. Consumer decisions require a choice among several alternatives in the market place. Shopping occasions provide
This article is going to analyze the quick win paradox, the traps and how to avoid them.
Quick win is a distinct and a quick way that offers better contribution to the achievement of any business. In the sides of managers and leaders, it is a form that
Firstly, researchers are of the opinion that more choices have made people confused when it comes to buying. Secondly, organizations that do not provide consumers with excessive number of options are preferred more in comparison with the other. In
13 Pages(3250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The paradox of choice for FREE!