Identification of Relevant and Irrelevant Cost - Coca Cola Flavored Milk

Identification of Relevant and Irrelevant Cost - Coca Cola Flavored Milk Essay example
Undergraduate
Essay
Finance & Accounting
Pages 3 (753 words)
Download 0
Identification of Relevant& Irrelevant Cost – Coca Cola Flavored Milk Coca-Cola Amatil Limited (CCL) is considered for the purpose of this project which aims to identify the three relevant and three irrelevant estimations of cost in a particular project…

Introduction

In the mid of 2007, the company underwent some serious planning regarding the extension of current product lines. Carbonated drinks, mineral water, fruit juices and other non-alcoholic beverages were already there in company’s product portfolio, yet the company realized the importance of adding a new product in the form of flavored milks. The launch of this new product under the name of Coca-Cola’s brand name is one of the most challenging tasks for the product managers as well as the project managers of the company. The research and development department of the company undertook rigorous workings on the proposed launch of flavored milk. The whole research process followed the different stages including planning, development of the new product, testing, commercial viability, branding, initial launch of the new product and many other activities. Each of these activities had its own cost estimates which are considered as either relevant or non-relevant. Planning Stage The planning stage is the general stage for all those products that are intended to be launched. The costs arising due to this activity are always considered as irrelevant because the planning process always keeps going on irrespective of the fact whether a new product is launched or not in the current timeframe. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Investment Decision: Coca-Cola Vs. Pepsi
Being multination, Pepsi and Coca-Cola operates in all the five continents of the world. Coca-Cola uses a marketing phrase “Coke side of life” (Byrne, 2010) while Pepsi on the other hand uses “Hot stuff” and “Pepsi is in sync” (Pepsi-Cola, 2006) in their internet sites to popularize their brands. As evidenced in the product market, beverage and soft drink products from these companies…
Account theory:The Coca-Cola Company
Unfortunately, despite efforts by philosophers and theorists, one can see that individuals and businesses have not been able to fulfill the ethical requirements that often result in unethical practices, disasters, public controversies, scandals, etc (Crane, 2007, pp. 19-24). In other words, business ethics seems a theoretical world, as such principles rarely exist in the real world. In response,…
Coca-Cola Company vs. PepsiCo, Inc
Consequent to this input, the plan is effectively funded to sustain total elasticity as laid down in the Pension Plan Act 2006. Generally, the fund was estimated to finance all the subsequent contributions in future from the operating activities. In accordance to the guidelines of IFRS the international pension plans of the company are funded in conformity to the domestic laws and the income tax…
The Coca-Cola Company Financial Results Analysis
There are various interesting issues about the North American market for The Coca-Cola Company in terms of its volume growth or declines for the period. For instance, in the second quarter of 2012, there was a volume growth of 4% at the global level. In the same aspect, in the quarter it turned to 5% in accordance with the year-to-date ratings. Therefore, this suggests that there was a growth of…
Coca-Cola Company versus PepsiCo, Inc.
In 2009, the companies work under the 401k pension plan which provides insurance advantage on the medical requirements of the employees. In Coca-Cola the contributory plan is done by both the employer and the employees where the employer enjoys the benefit of taxation for their employees. The pension plan of PepsiCo is based on the willingness of the employees as the benefits are availed by both…
Investment Analysis of Coca Cola and Pepsi.
Later he formed Pepsi-Cola Company in 1902. In 1965, Pepsi-Cola Company was merged with Frito-Lay, Inc. which created PepsiCo, Inc. PepsiCo. has expanded to include various range of foods like snack foods, health drinks, etc. Their current head is Indra Nooyi who is the Chairman and CEO (Penzkofer, 2007). The major customers of the company are the young generation of people and also include the…
Coca-Cola Company vs. PepsiCo, Inc
The two companies have set some pension plans that have had many effects on the companies’ level of investment and risk while also, it affects their levels of sale and production of products. These plans are aimed at benefiting their retired employees while each company uses a quite different approach from the other. The two companies have developed strong public relations across many nations…