Federal Reserve has publicly announced that the banking system of US does not need to accept and operate according to the rule before the month of July of 2014 but the banks will have to conduct the process of “good faith planning efforts” to get ready to accept the rule in the future and during the temporary phase. As banks and the financial system is still not aware of the bans that will be levied, there will be a cloud of uncertainty that these systems will experience for two years (Ciro 2012). These systems are experiencing ambiguity in understanding what does the Federal Reserve means by good faith planning efforts. The ambiguities are making condition worse thus decision makers should make the scenario clear and present the effects of the rule on US and other nations. The cloudy situation was made clear when a draft of the regulation was prepared and this draft consisted of details regarding the services offered by financial system and the way these services are used by the common public. The situation is still quite unclear for financial institutions as even the draft wasn’t clear enough to identify the effects that the rule will have on financial sector. The European Union and other countries have even showed concerns as they expect that the rule will decrease the liquidity in world financial markets, thus it is quite clear that the rule will impact the financial systems negatively. Body The delay in implementing and clearing the effect of the rule may not help the banks and make situation worse as banks do not have the correct idea of when the rule will be implemented and banks will have to accept the rule legally regardless of whether they understand its effect or not. Legally it is stated that those banks that have operated in good faith effort during the temporary implementation phase will experience less problems in complying with the actual rule. The policy makers should make the scenario clearer instead of making the financial system of US and overseas operate according to their own guess work. The delay is making the financial system take decisions under ambiguous situation which is already hurting the system. Volcker Permitted Bank Activities According to the rule there are certain permitted activities that can be performed by the banks, these activities comprise of banks acting as market maker, underwriter, hedger, deals of government securities and other activities that are stated under the act as permitted activities. These activities have been permitted to ensure that banks continue to provide liquidity to the markets and help companies in raising capital. But these activities have been restricted to ensure that banks do not cross the line and the funds with the bank do not become unsafe. If the permitted activities cannot be conducted in a safe environment and without risky conditions, then the federal system has the right to barge banks from conducting such activities or increase charges and fines on these activities so these activities become unfavourable to the banks. The activities that have been stated as acceptable in the rule are done on the basis that the bank conducts these activities for the customer and only to meet the short term demands of the customers. Rule Effect The Volcker Rule has received its name from the Paul Volcker who was the Federal Reserve Chairman during the period of the financial crises of 2008. The
The Volcker Rule and its Consequences for the Financial and Banking System Introduction The main purpose of Volcker Rule was to restrict banks from conducting risky activities which could possibly generate high amount of profits and losses (Liaw 2011)…
The continent is a self governing country that is a part of the commonwealth federation. It is currently bounded by the Timor sea, Arafura sea, Torres strait, Coral sea, Tasman sea, Bass strait along with the Indian ocean (Verdier, p.11). It is the smallest continent found on the globe and the sixth largest country in the world.
The Time Magazine in its cover story of 12 July 2010 examines how lobbyists shaped the financial reform bill of 2010. Carried-interest provision According to Center for Responsive Politics, lobbying firms like Capitol Tax Practioners were paid $ 3.4 billion by banks, mortgage lenders, stockbrokers, private-equity funds and derivatives traders in 2009.
Japan has also incurred high public debt for which its credit rating has been downgraded by Standard and Poor’s (S&P) in January 2011. In August of the same year, S&P downgraded long-term U.S. sovereign debt from the highest possible rating, AAA, to AA+.
The current banking system is mainly concentrated on paper transactions and various forms of wire transfers. Any money that needs to be sent is delayed in proportion to the farness of its destination at least in the case of paper transactions. This delays business deals and this delay is also known to have destroyed many lives.
Volcker states that the proprietary trading weakened completely the financial system just for trader bonuses and bank profits (Editorial Board 2012, par. 1). However, this new federal rule or legislation is attracting protests
ial status, performance and flexibility of an enterprise to various users of such information for evaluating the competence of management and for economic decision making (University of Leicester, 2009). The capital providers are the main users of financial information thus the
The discussion focuses on ring fencing of retail banking from investment banking in the United Kingdom while in countries such as Germany and France, hybridization of ring fencing and proprietary trading has been
10 pages (2500 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com