Major Issues in Future Shock - Essay Example

Due to the overwhelming attempt by individuals to be at par with the developments that happen as technology progresses fast, individuals may develop future shock. Toffler considers that the future shock is an unavoidable, inevitable consequence of ancient forces.

However, he claims that we can shield ourselves from its most horrible effects with an amalgamation of technological control, education deconstruction, and psychological engineering. According to Toffler (4), the solution to future shock is not non-alteration, but a diverse type of alteration. The foremost recommendation for coping with these alterations is to admit that different people will deal with the changes in dissimilar ways and at altered rates and have the public deliver contradictory levels of public services set to individual requirements. Individuals who may adjust, but require help to do so, might be engaged in halfway curriculums where the degree of change is cautiously measured or less tremendously, be part of situational provision groups upon which they can share their worries with other individuals going through similar modification-related stress. In more fundamental cases, Toffler proposes that crisis therapy professionals and programs might be required to take care of life changes and events. Nevertheless, for individuals incapable of adapting to technological and social change, he suggests the formation of the territories of the past which are no-change, future-free, encapsulated zones subsidized by the public at large.

Additionally, Toffler explains how education can assist to deal with the problem. He says that the education system should be evolved to focus mainly on preparing students on how to cope with the rapid changes occurring all over the globe. He advocates the replacement of old-fashioned schools which are outdated with a combination of future-orientated, independent study and computer-based instruction apprenticeship programs. He discusses the formation of a de-homogenized and decentralized educational system governed by independent community assemblies and driven by the fluctuating requirements of society rather than the old-fashioned principles of a liberal education. Moreover, he asserts that the ecological, psychological, and economic costs of modernization need to be measured. Panels should be formed comprising behavioral scientists who will be clearing and reviewing new technologies before their society release. These scientists will be buoyed by technology regulators, which are agencies of the public charged with acting and investigating grievances about the reckless use of technology. He categorically finishes by stating that for the future shock to be barred completely, technological advancements should be tamed.