You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
National Football League v. Primetime 24, 211 F.3d 10 WNET, Thirteen v. Aereo, Inc., 712 F.3d 676
Journalism & Communication
Pages 3 (753 words)
Student Name: Tutor’s Name: Subject: Date of Submission: Case Review and Principles Governing Application of Privacy Related Torts The case number 99-9244 and 99-9388, National Football League, the Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. Primetime 24 Joint Venture, the Defendant-Appellant was contended from January 25, 2000 and ruled on April 28, 2000.
In the case’s previous history, pursuant to 28 U.S.C 636(c), National Football League took a legal action against Primetime 24 for copyright violation and sought for an injunctive relief and statutory damages. National Football League accused Primetime 24 of going beyond their statutory license offered for certain U.S. retransmissions by the Satellite Home Viewer Act by transmitting patented NFL football game telecasts to Canada (Van Graafeiland et al 1). The Plaintiff had argued that though the Satellite Home Viewer Act approved the transmission of the program to only “unserved households” within United States, the defendant recurrently conveyed NFL game broadcasts to areas and regions beyond United States. National Football League also argued that it had not granted Primetime 24 the prerogative to distribute broadcasts of NFL to other regions beyond United States. The appeals court upheld the earlier decision of the court to issue a permanent injunction to Primetime 24 (Van Graafeiland et al 1). The case number 12-2786 and 12-2807, WNET, Thirteen, et al, the Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants vs. Aereo, Inc, et al, the Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendant-Appellants, vs. ...
Not exactly what you need?