Many poor Americans cannot eat food with integrity because they do not like being seen as if they are poor yet they are poor. Even if they wish to eat with integrity, they do not know what to eat that will not affect their health. They want to associate themselves with the food taken by the high and the mighty in the nation (Ikerd). They decline from taking the best food that is free from intoxications brought about by preservation methods, processing and so many other processes food is passed through up to the point of being sold. In the process of transporting the processed food, there are various things done to the food which results in intoxication (Nielsen 31). The methods used to grow food also affect the quality of food hence making it harmful to the human health for instance, if genetically modified organisms were used. There are a lot of wastes from the industrial farming which affects the quality of the food people eat. This affects the conventions of producing integrity foods. The quality of food with integrity needs to be produced in consistent with the values of the community, beliefs and principles. This is not possible nowadays because there is a lot of inhumane handling of animal bred for food purposes. There are few people entrusted to handling food growth that is free from chemicals but none is focused to ensure they act upon the needs of the people. Americans shunned the foods with integrity because no fair treatment of food with integrity can be trusted. The people responsible for protesting or become citizen activists become silenced by the emerging giant industries producing such foods (Nielsen 30). The Americans have shown a preference for foods grown in the United States than from other regions. Most of the Americans capitalize on eating organic foods because they do not contain pesticide residues and other effects of farming effects but, it is hard to tell the difference with the GMOs. The genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are known to be harmful to the health or individuals (Ikerd). Whether the Americans are poor or not, they tend to be strict about the food they eat because they do not like contamination of the unhealthy food. They cannot eat food that have been killed humanely because they feel that meat from genetically modified organisms provide a means of maximizing exposure to the growth of antibiotics and hormones that are fed to animals. These antibiotics are given to animals under inhumane conditions and environment which is why they fear the meat even if it is killed in humane procedures (Eating with Integrity). American historical commitments into organic food influence how they consider the organic substances in relation to the inorganic or the genetically modified organism. They are committed to ensuring that the society has a healthy foundation by watching the food they take as well as the drinks (Ikerd). All this is done to build healthy communities and permanence within the society. The organic movement that is rampant in the country emphasizes of the health more than safety of the food (Ikerd). Because of the fact that people want to watch their health, they advocate for safe eating habits than taking of food with chemicals that can intoxicate their health. There is an international slow food movement which provides tangible evidence of the new global culture of food. The slow food is a worldwide movement that has more than eighty thousand members in one hundred countries.
Class Name: Date Assignment is due: Americans in Poverty Cannot Eat With Integrity About seventy five percent of Americans cannot eat food outside America because they take a lot of caution so as to ensure that they care for their health…
This had targeted to reduce by half the proportion of people living in extreme poverty and those living on an income of less than a dollar a day. This is not the case as most people and countries still suffer from poverty. According to Shah (1) almost half of the world’s populations live on less than 2.5 dollars a day.
The fate of poor people is unchanging mainly associated with insufficient food and clothes. They have to suffer all the societal ill-treatments. They have to be quiet and calm against any social injustice. They cannot have any status in the public life.
Some of the reasons include unemployment, lack of adequate income, circumstances beyond one’s control like divorce or a lawsuit, issues that prohibit family members from working like disability, bad choices like alcohol
ss the personal and professional value of integrity would exude the characteristics and determination to abide by ethical and moral standards, as expected of a leader.
I strongly believe that the ability of leaders to follow the integrity competencies depend on the personal and
ends in this article that the affluent people should spend their money only on what is necessary, and give their surplus resources to the poor people dying of hunger (Singer, 558). A critical analysis of this argument shows that Peter Singer is wrong on this issue. The solution
Simply put therefore, a person of integrity is that person who cannot be compromised, not because of the circumstances and consequences, but merely because the person stands for some principle which he/she cannot change. Nevertheless, the mere fact that
Honesty and morality are other interchangeable terms that are given to integrity. I understood the actual meaning of integrity at school one afternoon, when I was a part of an accident in the parking lot.
I had gone out for lunch and when I returned to
2 pages (500 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com