Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

“All Animals Are Equal” by Peter Singer. - Book Report/Review Example

Free
College
Book Report/Review
Literature
Pages 1 (251 words)
Download 0

Summary

One of the strongest pleas for the rights and liberation of animals, following the success of various liberation movements of humanity, has been Peter Singer's "All Animals Are Equal", an important article dealing with the need for the liberation of all animals…

Extract of sample
“All Animals Are Equal” by Peter Singer.

One of the strongest pleas for the rights and liberation of animals, following the success of various liberation movements of humanity, has been Peter Singer's "All Animals Are Equal", an important article dealing with the need for the liberation of all animals. According to the author, the liberation movement should expand our moral horizons and open up a reinterpretation of the basic moral principle of equality. The author attempts to maintain that equal rights to animals cannot be denied on the basis of the argument that humans and nonhumans are different and should not have equal rights. To Peter Singer, equality of consideration is the basic principle of equality, and equal consideration for different beings may lead to different treatment and different rights. "It is an implication of this principle of equality that our concern for others ought not to depend on what they are like, or what abilities they possess-although precisely what this concern requires us to do may vary according to the characteristics of those affected by what we do. It is on this basis that the case against racism and the case against sexism must both ultimately rest; and it is in accordance with this principle that speciesism is also to be condemned." (Singer) The author maintains that if possessing a higher degree of intelligence does not entitle one human to use another for his own ends, it also does not entitle humans to exploit nonhumans. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Recreational Hunting: An immoral Violation of Animal Rights
ins that recreational hunting is little other than a cruel blood sport which is ultimately predicated on the erroneous assumption of man's dominion over nature, on the one hand, and the fact that animals do not have rights, on the other. The proponents of recreational hunting contend that this particular activity emanates from man's instinctual hunter and survivalist nature.5 As a species, man has survived because of an innately instinctual capacity to live by the land and to function as predator, rather than prey.
4 pages (1004 words)
Salamander Surgery
Utilitarian philosophy upholds the principle of equal consideration of interests such that all things being equal utmost consideration should be given to that which would bring the most happiness and benefit and would cause less pain and suffering. This assumes that creatures of equal characteristics should be given equal consideration.…
14 pages (3514 words)
Animals
The blatant and abhorrent obliviousness with which we exploit animal's poses a threat not only to their survival but any further imbalance in nature will start the downfall of mankind itself.…
13 pages (3263 words)
Animal rights Essay
R.G.Frey, meanwhile, considers that the human beings have a higher value as compared to animals on account of their potential and abilities and the quality of life that they lead. However he accepts that equal pain and suffering is also suffered by animals. In Tom Regan's case for animal rights, he speaks about how animals have moral rights and if due respect is given to human beings who are not rational, such as infants or mentally challenged people, then animals should not be deprived of this right just because they cannot make rational decisions for themselves.…
3 pages (753 words)
Singer moral principle. Peter Singer and greatest happiness principle.
Peter Singer's article 'Famine, Affluence and Morality' is an interesting read even though it is difficult to agree totally with his point of view. His view "If we can prevent something bad without sacrificing anything of comparable significance, we ought to do it." does not sound very practical. In this article he has emphasized on two issues. One issue is an analogy provided by him. In this analogy he mentions that if a child is drowning in a pond then we should save him if there is no fear of risking our lives in that act. If we really face such a situation then it would without doubt be a…
7 pages (1757 words)
Deontologists vs. Consequentialists
If someone were to do his moral duty and perform an action consistent with ethical principles, then it would not matter if it had negative consequences. Such is the view that deontologists hold - decisions are made and actions done on the merit of the rightness or wrongness of an action and not on the rightness or wrongness of its outcomes. Simply put: certain actions or rules are regarded as appropriate, regardless of the consequence they have. Euthanasia, or mercy-killing, may be cited as an example of such principle put into action. Putting an end to one’s agony by cutting off a…
5 pages (1255 words)