Nazim Hikmet's The Epic Of Sheikh Bedreddin: A Comparative Study Of Three English Versions - Essay Example

ng literature 3.4.1 Applying the theory of Interlingual translation to literature 17 3.5 Translations of Hikmet's “The Epic of Sheikh Bedreddin” 3.5.1 Issues surrounding the translations 18 3.5.2 Randy Blasing’s translation 19 3.5.3 Mutlu Konuk’s translation 19 3.5.4 Larry Clark’s translation 20 3.5.5 Strategies in keeping the beuty of poetry in translation 22 CHAPTER 4 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE 3 VERSIONS 4.1 Description of Randy Blasing’s Work 24 4.2 Description of Mutlu Konuk’s Work 28 4.

3 Description of Larry Clark’s Work 31 4.4 Comparison of Linguistic Features of Text 34 4.5 Reasons of Lexical Choices by Translators 35 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION 5.1 Research Hypothesis Support 38 5.2 Finding Importance and Relevance 39 5.3 Implications for future research 40 REFERENCES 42 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION The ability to create specific expressions within literature is not only bound by the expectations of the author. There are also expressions which are reflective of social and political issues as well as the historical applications of the time.

These become essential in defining the approach which is taken toward writing poetry and fiction. The expressions change in terms of the literary devices which are used as well as the way in which the literature is able to create and define the expressions and experiences throughout the piece. The difficulty which often arises in literature comes with the translations which are associated with literature and the way in which this becomes bound to the literary meanings. This is furthered by complexities from the translators, specifically because of the limitations in understanding the full expressions and meanings which are associated with literary devices and the way in which various words, phrases and overall concepts.

The ability to create specific expressions within literature is not only bound by the expectations of the author. There are also expressions which are reflective of social and political issues as well as the historical applications of the time. These become essential in defining the approach which is taken toward writing poetry and fiction. The expressions change in terms of the literary devices which are used as well as the way in which the literature is able to create and define the expressions and experiences throughout the piece.

The difficulty which often arises in literature comes with the translations which are associated with literature and the way in which this becomes bound to the literary meanings. This is furthered by complexities from the translators, specifically because of the limitations in understanding the full expressions and meanings which are associated with literary devices and the way in which various words, phrases and overall concepts are a part of the language (Venuti, Baker, 2000). The problem which arises becomes based on the translators’ interpretations as well as the knowledge that is based around the original writing and literary devices which are used.

Beginning to transform this particular aspect of literature then leads to different definitions and meaning behind the literature when translated. 1.1 Justification for choice of topic This research paper will define some of the common difficulties with translation and the ability to alter the meanings of various pieces of literature through the philosophies and interpretations of translators. Specifically, there will be an examination of the work of Hikmet and “The Epic of Sheikh Bedreddin.”