American Foreign Dreams - Essay Example

America foreign dreams The US is the world’s superpower nation and the sovereignty s back in the 19th and 20th century after gaining independence. America seceded from the British colonialists, and begun showing in other parts of the North and South American continents. The number of presidents, who succeeded power after George Washington, simultaneously derived the urge and interests towards the continent, with the prospects that the anticipated colonies would boost slave trade (Northrup 14)1. America reflected interest Spanish colonies and undertook provocative naval operations that fuelled the sinking of the Maine vessel. This served as the main reason to engage on a battle with the Spanish, but the fact remained that America focused on acquiring the territories. After the battle, America seized control over Cuba and other Caribbean islands. With continuous rivalry in foreign interests and the limited global resources, America depicted that the turn of events would critically crumble the economy thus emerging with new approaches to tame strategic geographical regions for economic interests (McCormick 12)2. The following context entails America’s dream and the approaches of isolation, political influences, and world peace, with much concentration in the Middle East. America won the Second World War and ensured that the subsequent treaties after the war favored its side. The commissioning bodies formed to promote world peace favored the projects and programs of interests that America has towards other nations. For example, such treacherous are in prevalence between the US and the UN Security Council following the Middle East attacks, whereby America declares war and the UN remains to oppose the decision. The US has in invaded Afghanistan, Iraq, and depicts dire interests in attacking Iran (Murphy 14)3. The isolation policy of the United States of America is a treacherous affair to the extent that the country avoids involvement with other nations whilst possessing control over trade affairs. The country implements precise policies that help reshape the economy. For example, the influence of the dollar among the world trade affairs implements an approach of indirect involvement in global foreign policies. Although America reflected interest towards the Caribbean islands, the main reason behind the involvement did not reflect towards saving the islands from their colonial oppressors. The country continually drove off the Spanish colonial rulers of the South American region, Cuba, and Panama. In the 20th century, America practiced slave and established the Caribbean would serve to propel the trade by serving for slave territories. Despite the climate and consequential diseases that affected the slaves and the natives of the regions, the US declined on understanding the predicaments as they pursued their own trade interests (Northrup 28)4. The nationals of the southern and northern American states united to fight the oppressors and establish the country’s trade objectives. Predictions established are that the US interest remained uncultured and untamed towards the islands on the bases of trade as depicted from the purchase of the Philippines islands at an amount of $20 million. This revealed that the main purpose of the battle targeted eradication of Spanish operations as they hindered American penetration to the interior thus inhibiting efficiency in slave trade. The factor derives a state that the involvement of America to other nations targets to achieve sole economic gains at the docility of the other nations (Whalan 4)5. During the First World War, the president of the United States of America, Thomas Woodrow Wilson consulted the congress on involvement of America in the war to end wars and with much emphasis on redeeming their loosing allies in battlefield. However, the American soldiers died and severed injuries accounted on the negligence, ignorance, and malpractices of the allied nations. Therefore, America resolved to defect form any involvement with battles of the European nations (Northrup 30)6. Following the end of Wilson’s tenure in 1921, Warren Harding defected from the total isolation practice and emphasized on political normalcy in the United States of America towards the foreign nations. The advocacy was that the country would act in response of a war as a world soldier and not as a political ally (Whalan 14)7. Thorough the practice of normalcy and isolation, Warren Harding predicted on the possibility that country of America would perceive economic importance through indirect involvement in the European nations commonly referred to as a ‘World Policeman’ to the league of nations (Murphy 14)8. The president initiated that the country would show political interests to the European political welfare and derives the strategic means of benefiting from the economic advantages would enhance the country’s GDP growth. The implications and predictions of Harding were that the country would have the ability to spend on national development without taxing the citizens (Freeman 24)9. This isolation technique fuelled imperialism and liberalization whereby, the country helps nations while masking the face of economic interest at the advantage of ignorance in the host nations’ authorities. The aspect of racism confused America’s resolution towards the policy of isolation. This is to the extent that the country’s authorities depicted that the growing populations of the eastern and Asian races needed control. The implications are that the America could oppress the nations while comprising of their citizens in the population. The country focused bon initiating education systems that separated the races while emphasizing on the method as a form of service and equity to all. However, the eventual outcome would lead to increased job opportunities for the American citizens and reduced job opportunities to the foreign Asian and African races (Murphy 20)10. The poverty levels served to inhibit prosperity, dominance, and population increase of the inferior races. The country further initiated procedural approach to the world trade to benefit more above the other nations through trade tariffs and taxes on imports (McCormick 17)11. The approach served to the effect until the foreign nations realized the oppressive nature of the tariffs and initiated theirs on America’s exports. America further pursued advantages while holding on the isolationist theory towards communism and other villain nations in world. Following the end of the First World War, America declined to join the treaty organizations together with other nations and emphasized on solace to its affairs. The controversy followed that the American government termed the USSR as a villain after failure to compensate the debts owed to America following the war. The exemption and isolation policy of America thus ruled to separate USSR from the favor of other European nations based on the communist practices that did not auger well with the capitalist nations (Freeman 34)12. Therefore, isolationism practice of America served to coerce other nations to stand against the USSR yet America was not an ally to the League of Nations (Whalan 24)13. The advent of rivalry from the 1930s to 1940s among nations served to the effect of maturing the isolationism policy of the U.S.A, and the consequential approach was to ensure utmost separation and enmity thus paving way for America’s dominance. Theodore Roosevelt, the America’s president consented to the congress to implement acts that held America from war and aggression in other nations while enabling a continuity of business operations among the nations (Whalan 26)14. Spain loyalists faced the threat of the fascist, Francisco Franco who advocated for dictatorship while gaining support from German and Italy under the regimes of Hitler and Benito respectively. The USSR intervened and supported the Spanish loyalists, and this held America to advocate for laxity to the situation, as they were enemies (McCormick 18)15. Threats of a second world war were imminent as the Europe and East Asia were continually forming alliances and engaging into battles. Despite pleads of the weak nations for intervention; America avoided the situation and abided to the isolationism policy to ensure progression and economic dominance at reduced animosity from the fighting nations. Roosevelt support for the Japanese Fascism government ended after bombing of the Pearl Harbor thus drawing the country to entry into the war at the time, the only nation of England acting against the will of dictatorship was England following the German defeat over the French (Freeman 36)16. The American government tabled for revision of the acts that restrained the country from direct involvement into the war of after the bombing of the Pearl Harbor that resulted to the loss of 3000 Americans. The majority of the Americans supported the motion for immediate action in retaliation to Japans’ atrocities to the nation. The country feared that the alliances formed by dictatorial and communist regimes would crumble America thoroughly. However, the military equipment of America dominated superiority over the world thus increasing trust to defeat the enemies (McCormick 20)17. The involvement in the war coincided with the act of isolationism to the advantage of the Americans. The fact was that America targeted to protect the territories, and islands it held in the Caribbean and pacific region thus had to source unity from the remaining ally, England (Freeman 35)18. Although America poised the situation to implicate that it was out of support for England to battle against the Nazi’s, the reason remained a treacherous affair (McCormick 24)19. US sold weaponry to the allied nations and encouraged them to inhibit supply of ammunition to the German and Italian countries. The Americans advocated for an initial blockade against the German in fear that German penetration through England would enhance maritime atrocities to the US (Freeman 36)20. Therefore, despite the supply of armament that America rendered to the UK, the generosity was to the advantage of America as it amassed the returns on sales ammunition to develop new superior warheads and stabilize the economic. The involvement in the war established a new approach to isolationist policy. For example, the white race shifted to serve in the military thus vacating factory and farm jobs, this rendered new job opportunities to the Native Americans and other inferior races, and there was peak in migration throughout the country of America and the neighboring Mexico (Northrup 32)21. The essence was that the nation’s continuity in production remained profound with reduced internal animosities from the races that had previously posed as inferior. However, the payments of the white laborers and inferior races differed accordingly thus reflecting on the policy of isolationism to promote white economic welfare while taking advantage of docility and the perception of superiority from the white nation (Freeman 40)22. After the end of the Second World War, America established superiority and economic prowess over other nations. The only aspect that America felt as negatively affected following the Second World War was the military reserves (Paterson 20)23. The superiority perceived led to the dominance of territorial and maritime rights that favored it more than any other nation affiliated to the United Nations. Although, the UN restricted nations from involvement into a foreign war without the consent of the council, America helped South Korea to fight against the North Korean invasion seeking to merge the country back to the Korean Peninsula. Isolationism reflected on the South Korean involvement of America was the sell of ammunition and military prowess to the Korean nationals. Through the past decades, America reflected urge towards involvement in other weak nations aiding affairs (Murphy 22)24. The country further adheres to the theory of liberalization and depicts that the essence is to promote global peace. Since the end of the cold war in the late 20th century, America deviated from the economic approaches to then international community and emphasized on peace and security. Such an approach served effectively for America to pursue and tame nations for economic gains while masking the approach to depict global security. US stresses out that the country focuses on improved collaborating in business relations and with a continuous rate of innovation at reduced chances of animosity (McCormick 22)25. However, the attribute of unity targets to lure the Arab spring into the United States trap as the policy of isolation in the US denounces any unity that does not serve to the advantage of the US nation whatsoever (Paterson 23)26. The US expression of trade involvement in the Middle East depicts the urge to acquire fossils and natural gas to stimulate the economy towards growth and ensure continuity and dominance in the global stature. The country’s emphasis on liberalization of the world through aiding weaker nations relates to new approach to isolationism since logic depicts of the impossibility of a country to help another without economic or political interests. The US involvement in the Middle East led to the war with Afghanistan, and Iraq. Despite the US anti-terrorism approach to lure allies into the battle, the country dominates a profound difference to guard its sole interests (Freeman 41)27. The other reason to the effect of amassing the wealth and resources from countries and ensure that the political states implemented would serve to the advantage of America. However, US oppression through isolationism and neo-liberalization with the dollar dominance in the international market, continually ensure that nations do not escape the involvement. The Arab spring pose threat to the US policies because of the trade agreements within the nations and abundance in resources (Murphy 24)28. The threat to the US nation and the citizens revolves around the growth of supremacy of the Arab spring and the withdrawal from the battles in Iraq and Afghanistan. The nation remains uncertain of the consequential fallouts and distrust with the Arab nations because of the continuous aggression in pursuance of economic and armed dominance (McCormick 24)29. The US stands vulnerable to the attacks of terrorists and jihadists from the Muslim nations across the world. Conclusions are that the isolationist policy reflected on the continuous process of growth to the American economy. The changes made to the isolationists’ theory reflected to continuous economic and military supremacy that the U.S.A accumulates from the entire globe (Freeman 46)30. However, the policy seems to be steering towards stagnation with the implementation of other alliances that stimulate economies and injure the dollar value (Northrup 34)31. The theory further suffers from the lack to draw attention of allies to continuity in battle that they would not establish the main reason of involvement. Work cited Freeman, Mark P. Hindsight: The Promise and Peril of Looking Backward. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print. McCormick, James M. American Foreign Policy and Process. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010. Print. Murphy, Rob. Kingdom Come. S.l.: Authorhouse, 2011. Print. Northrup, Cynthia C. The American Economy: A Historical Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, 2003. Print. Paterson, Thomas G. American Foreign Relations: A History. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010. Print. Whalan, Mark. Race, Manhood, and Modernism in America: The Short Story Cycles of Sherwood Anderson and Jean Toomer. Knoxville: Univ. of Tennessee Press, 2007. Print. Read More