StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Leadership Issue: World Religious Leaders - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay describes the leadership issue in religion, that can bring about peace or lead to violence. The researcher focuses on the discussion of the changes that several world religious leaders have attempted and have an insight into their leadership styles…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97% of users find it useful
Leadership Issue: World Religious Leaders
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Leadership Issue: World Religious Leaders"

Religion can bring about peace or lead to violence; religion can encourage or discourage world change. Religion can be used for personal gains or religion can be used for transformation. Much depends upon the leader who initiates the change. It depends upon his objectives in bringing about a world change; it also depends upon how the word ‘religion’ is perceived. The relationship between religion and world change has been a social issue. Social science emphasizes the role of religion in maintaining tradition, and in preserving and justifying the present social structure (Silberman, Higgins, & Dweck, 2005). This paper will discuss the changes that several world religious leaders have attempted and have an insight into their leadership styles. Marx defines religion as an opiate for the masses, undermining any motivation to change society for the better. (Silberman, Higgins & Dweck). Leadership has traditionally been associated with power. Leader enjoys political or organizational authority. While there are many types of leadership, two are distinct and interrelated. Transactional leadership grants the same liberty and opportunity to others as to oneself like speaking the truth, keeping promises and imposing sanctions. It is more about punishments. Transformational leadership on the other hand has a more realistic and reasonable concept of the self. This self is connected to friends, family and community whose welfare is more important than one’s own. Transactional leadership manages outcomes and aims for behavioral compliance while transformational leadership, through values, justice, honesty, truth and human rights, enables one to embrace a change of heart (Bass & Steidlmeier, 1998). Transactional leadership would call it moral values if promises are kept, negotiations are fair and truth is told but it does not take into account the ideals the follower may happen to have. There are inherent difference across religious groups and consequently across leaders. Siblerman, Higgins and Dweck further quote that “any religion that professes to be concerned with the souls of men and is not concerned with the slums that damn them, the economic conditions that strangle them and the social conditions that cripple them is a dry-as-dust religion”. While Mahatma Gandhi and Aga Khan were transformational leaders, Pope and Dalai Lama impose sanctions and punishments and views social equality as a spiritualism struggle to realize God’s kingdom on earth. Nazarali-Stranieri (2005) says the greatest leader of twentieth century, Mahatma Gandhi, had no political title, he commanded no army, amassed no wealth but had tremendous influence. He gave cognizance to what the citizens wanted and derived power from that. His ideals and philosophies influenced millions across the world including great American civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. Gandhi could identify with the economically and politically marginalized people. Similarly, Aga Khan was not elected by a Council of Cardinals like the Pope, nor is he elected by the people. Yet like Gandhi he is the beacon of light for the millions underprivileged across the globe. Aga Khan too believed in uplifting the masses that entered the world in poverty. Dalai Lama is referred to as the spiritual and temporal Leader of the Tibetan people (FOT, n.d.). Dalai Lamas are a succession of incarnation. They are not elected or appointed; they are born to the position (Tenzin, 1996). Gandhi fought for enslavement, caste and gender oppression, religious hatred and most importantly he fought against poverty, which he believed was the root cause of violence. Aga Khan too, remains unaffected by the leaders trying to resolve differences between people. His institutions were the first to attack global poverty and he continues to work for eradication of mass poverty. Gandhi never imposed values, and his philosophy of non-violence even left an indelible mark on the South African struggle for racial justice. Even to awaken the consciousness of the British to their unjust domination over India, Gandhi did not resort to war. He believed in organized non-violent civil resistance. His leadership brought about irreversible change in Britain’s policy towards India. Truth was used as the tool to awaken the consciousness of humanity and liberate them from oppression and slavery. Dalai Lama is also an advocate of non-violence and believes the truth, courage and determination should be the weapons for liberation (CNN, 2001). Aga Khan too believed that humanity can be touched with the spark which ignites the spirit of individual enterprise and determination, to save them from degradation. Like Gandhi, Aga Khan too was against communalism and racism. Both these leaders believed in the dignity of an individual and all efforts and resources were directed towards their economic independence. The aim is to teach the person how to catch a fish rather than provide him with one (Giradet, n.d.). Both these transformational leaders did not use religion or religious beliefs to bring about world change. They viewed humanity as one universal brotherhood above religion, caste and creed. The Pope is elected by a Council of Cardinals but Gandhi was never elected to be a leader. Christianity uses the religion to first bring everyone under a common umbrella and then provide benefits which was not the policy of either Gandhi or Aga Khan. The Pope directs that the pagans of Asia and Africa be first converted to Christianity by building hospitals and educational institutions for them. Aga Khan and Gandhi had no political aspirations. The humanitarian projects funded by the Aga Khan Foundation are not meant for the Ismaili community. In fact they are the minority beneficiary. Humanity at large is the beneficiary, which demonstrates the principles of Aga Khan that humanity is above religion. Aga Khan believed in educating the masses which gives empowerment. He wants to educate the brightest but the underprivileged around the world. The Aga Khan Foundation (AKF) believes in taking emergency steps and then making the individual or the nation self-sufficient as was demonstrated when Tajikistan was left without food or fuel to fight the harsh winter. They were immediately supplied with food and sustenance and then knowledge and seeds to plan for food so that they would not have to depend upon others. They soon became self-sufficient. The world today is in dire need of governance lessons and pluralism provides this strength. Aga Khan is the pioneer in thinking along the lines of a Global Center for Pluralism in partnership with Canada. Pluralist factions or sects in third world countries have found ways to fight each other rather than work together. On the Global Center for Pluralism, Aga Khan says, “…we cannot make the world safe for democracy unless we also make the world safe for diversity.” According to him, pluralism is a deliberate set of choices that a society must make if it is to avoid costly conflict and harness the power of its diversity in solving human problems. This Center would aid in research, education and exchange about the values, practices and policies that underpin pluralist societies. It will function as a global repository and source for knowledge about fostering pluralistic values, policies, and practices. The objectives are similar to Gandhi – to enable every citizen, irrespective of cultural, religious or ethnic differences, to realize his or her full potential. Its sole objective is to improve the living conditions and opportunities for the poor, irrespective of the faith, origin and gender. Both Gandhi and Aga Khan believe that violence and religion are not linked. Terrorism is due to frustration, ignorance and unresolved political conflicts (Spiegel, 2006). Gandhi was against using violence to fight violence as it can debase the noblest causes. This is evidenced from the bloodshed that has been left behind by the various revolutionary movements towards liberation. Gandhi wanted injustice to be visible to the world and for this he and his followers were even willing to die. Aga Khan believes that world ethics has its origin in all world religions. Aga Khan is attempting to transform the world by ameliorating ignorance through education and creativity. Gandhi knew fear and ignorance could be won over through truth, forgiveness and love. He was an effective leader as he had the ability to bridge gap between communities and between religions. He possessed the tremendous ability to provincial and religious hatred that people nurtured against each other. Gandhi could promote religious harmony through his public and personal actions. He would fast to end violence. He worked towards independence of the mass from economic servitude and not just for a few elitists. While Gandhi was willing to fast but determined not to resort to violence, Dalai Lama too has stuck to his principles of non-violence and has been in exile in India since 1959. Both have been trying to free their nation from foreign rule but Gandhi has always been referred to as leader of humanity but the Dalai Lama as spiritual leader of Tibet. The Pope on the other hand, held power too closely to him for too long. He practiced contradictory leadership at different places. While like all other leaders he espoused human rights globally, within the church he resented disagreement. He fought for religious tolerance and political freedom but he was a conservative fostering the traditional Catholicism (Hampson, 2005). He was rigid and refused to reconsider Church doctrines. Like all other leaders, the Pope too spoke against capitalism and poverty but the principles were always to grant charity and aid against converting them to Christianity. Like Gandhi and the Dalai Lama, the Pope too proclaimed that non-violent faith could change the world. He had the conviction that his message was applicable universally to all men and women, irrespective of their religion. He made the world his parish. Like Gandhi and Aga Khan, the Pope too believed in dignity of the individual but he did not change with the flow of the times. He was rigid about the ban on contraception which led to the birth of unwanted children in poverty and that too amidst HIV/AIDs (Ash, 2005). Both Aga Khan and Gandhi provide leadership by example. Many international figures were influenced by Gandhi’s philosophy of non-violence. Even today this principle guides the actions of millions of average citizens across nations who fight participate in civil society movements. Dalai Lama is considered the most skilled and successful of all religious leaders; he is tolerant and informed and can enchant anyone at the very first instance but he is intent upon forcibly subjecting the world to its law. Dalai Lama has attempted to mix state and religion, which Gandhi and Aga Khan have not. Religion and history are not separated from one another in the Tibetan world view, nor politics and ritual, symbol and reality (Victor & Trimondi, 2003). Dalai Lama uses religion and his meditative power to influence people. Today a culturally diverse society requires transformational leadership as they morally uplift the humanity, who enable and empower them and not make them dependent citizens, who encourage them to convert their visions into reality. All the four leaders have traveled round the world to foster universal brotherhood. While Gandhi and the Pope changed the lives of the people in the country where they visited, the Dalai Lama has the liberation of Tibet at heart. All of these leaders believe that non-violence alone can change the world. People need to be transformed and not given temporary relief. Truth and love are the basic nature of all beings and it is through these characteristics that transformation can be brought. Aga Khan spreads the message through philanthropic activities especially in the field of education through the AKF, while the Pope uses the religion to educate the masses. Gandhi toiled personally through satyagraha and other movements to awaken the consciousness of the people. Each leader has been serving the people of the world in his own way but the greatest influence on humanity without the use of power and religion have been Gandhi and Aga Khan. All believe in equal human rights but the leadership and approach differs. Gandhi and Aga Khan want to make the people self-sufficient, which in essence is liberation and independence and which in essence is fostering equal human rights. References: Ash, T. G., (2005), The first world leader, 25 Nov 2006 Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1998), ETHICS, CHARACTER, AND AUTHENTIC TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 24 Nov 2006 CNN (2001), The Dalai Lama: a spiritual leader in exile, 25 Nov 2006 FOT (n.d.), His Holiness: the Dalai Lama, 25 Nov 2006 Giradet, E. (n.d.), The Christian Science Monitor, Hampson, R. (2005), Pope changed the world, 25 Nov 2006 Nazarali-Stranieri, F., (2005), The Most Influential Leader of the 20th Century, 24 Nov 2006 Silberman, I., Higgins, E. T., & Dweck, C. S. (2005), Religion and World Change: Violence and Terrorism versus Peace, Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 61, No. 4, 2005, pp. 761--784 Spiegel Der (2006), BBC Monitoring Service - United Kingdom Tenzin (1996), A Brief Biography of the Dalai Lama, 25 Nov 2006 Victor & Trimondi, V. (2003), Politics as ritual, 25 Nov 2006 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Leadership Issue: World Religious Leaders Essay”, n.d.)
Leadership Issue: World Religious Leaders Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/management/1538383-leadership-issue-world-religious-leaders
(Leadership Issue: World Religious Leaders Essay)
Leadership Issue: World Religious Leaders Essay. https://studentshare.org/management/1538383-leadership-issue-world-religious-leaders.
“Leadership Issue: World Religious Leaders Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/management/1538383-leadership-issue-world-religious-leaders.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Leadership Issue: World Religious Leaders

The Concept of Good Leadership

There is a common belief that leaders are born, however, leaders can also be made through training and learning of the leadership skills.... The people judge and determine the effectiveness of their leaders.... Good leadership leadership is a process in which one person, who is the leader, has an influence on the other people in order to achieve a set common goal.... leadership is important, as it ensures a cohesive and coherent environment....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Relgion in Politics

Despite the drive for autonomy, state leaders are expected to be affiliated with a certain religion.... hellip; Also, some religions allow the religious leader to be the head of the government such as in the case of the Vatican in Rome.... The desire to control world governments by religion in the past led to serious challenges including the development of rebellion against the religious states and the development of secular states across the world....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

Summer Olympic Games in China

The Chinese Communist Party leaders have also been quoted as saying that "religion can play a role in creating a "harmonious society", a term they associated with economic growth and social cohesion" (The Christian Century, P19(1)).... For all intensive purposes the political leadership took the place of religion and religious leadership.... In addition the politicians included key wording that opened up the possibility of religious observance within China: "The Party strives to fully implement its basic principals for its work related to religious affairs and rallies religious believers in making contributions to economic and social development" (America, p6(1))....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Emerging leadership theories

hellip; leaders who understand the Servant style are more concerned with the need for leadership and the needs of their employees rather than their own ego.... According to Greenleaf (2001), servant leaders live by the conscience which is the inward sense of what is morally right and wrong.... Thos leaders that are concerned with ethical leadership have a core value of integrity.... In all three cases, the employees want to follow these leaders so they do....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Servant Leadership in the Bible

hellip; The author states that in many of the settings, servant leaders are the epitome of service delivery to the people, showing the growing need for a better means of dealing with the tasks at hand.... This test is administered in harder situations where the difficulty tests the leader's ability to come up with better means of dealing with failures as well as the relationship between leaders and workers (Kernis, & Goldman, 2006).... Servant leaders have the natural feeling that emanates from this desire (Walumbwa, Avolio, Gardner, Wernsing, & Peterson, 2008)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Dissertation

Religious Groupings

nbsp;Religious groupings exhibit these characteristics, whereby few leaders are chosen and given authority to oversee the effective running of the religious groupings.... ccording to Feldman (2002), “Religious groups have a tendency of choosing leaders who are expected to lead in a manner that reflects the feelings of every member of the group”.... The paper "religious Groupings" discusses the groupings as they demonstrate a common belief in most of the things that they do together....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Current Issues Surrounding the Quran and Its Interpretation

Through social media, the Muslim faithful is now able to get an interpretation of the Quran by consulting religious leaders in forums such as 'ask the Imam'.... hellip; The Quran is a religious book for the Muslim believers written by the prophet Muhammad to record accounts revealed to him by the almighty God concerning the Muslim religious teachings.... Some Muslim scholars have worked to clear the misguided misinterpretation of the holy book through scholarly material that looks into the Quran and the Muslim religious practices....
8 Pages (2000 words) Book Report/Review

The US Pledge of Allegiance in Arabic Leads School to Apologize

dentity as a result of recognition has been used by world leaders to influence their ideas on governance issues.... religious revivalism is a result of religious secularization.... After a deculturation of religion by secularization, there will be a religious comeback.... The action by the school was disrespectful of the religious beliefs of Arabian students.... is a country that appreciates religious and cultural diversity should not have had and implemented such an idea that forced all the students to pledge their allegiance to the flag of the country....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us