Case:Procter & Gamble - Essay Example

Procter & Gamble Case Study s of Affiliation: Procter & Gamble Case Study 12 Before reading this chapter, how did you define teamwork? How did this definitioncorrespond to the definition outlined in this book? In my own understanding, teamwork refers to the performance of an activity by a certain group of individuals, working in collaboration with each other towards the realization of a specific goal or objective. According to the Procter & Gamble case study, there is no difference pertaining to teamwork, as the definition given in the book talk of similar aspects as those I have addressed.12.2 Think of a team you’ve worked in that performed poorly.

Were any of the causes of thepoor performance related to the forces that tend to create process loss? If so, which forcewas most problematic? What steps, if any, did your team take to deal with the problem? Previously, in my former organization, team really played a substantive role in enhanced the chances towards the realization of organizational goals. However, at one time, the team failed significantly. Ideally, there were two major forces that contributed towards the process loss, which are coordination loss and motivation loss.

Of the two, the most problematic was motivational loss, an aspect in which workers in a particular team do not work as hard as they should, due to lack of enhancements that would make the workers want to work more. This can usually be attributed to various factors including low wages. Considering that one of the contributors towards process loss is motivation loss, an amicable way to solve was to raise fees, thereby once again influencing the workers to work harder.12.3 Think about the team states described in this chapter.

If you joined a new team, how longdo you think it would take you to get a feel for those team states? Which states would yoube able to gauge first? Which would take longer? Different individuals take different periods before they can get a feel for the team states once they get to join such teams. In my own perceptions, it would take me approximately two to three weeks to master all the different team states, which are the feelings and thoughts exhibited by individuals because of their working together.

The first of the various team states, which I was able to gauge is that of potency, an aspect referring to the extent to which workers believe that with team work, they are able to accomplish different tasks in different situations. The team state that took longest is that of cohesion, in which team workers who work together have to trust each other and building strong emotional bond to both other workers and the team itself. This particular team state require quite a long time before such developments occur.