The International Relations of the Middle East - Case Study Example

Foreign military intervention in the Middle East in the 21st century has destabilised the state system Name of the Writer Name of the Course Name of the Institute Name of the Instructor Date Introduction The paper basically looks to explore the foreign military interventions in the Middle East during the 21st century which has played a major role in destabilising the state system across the Middle East. In the past decade or so, Middle East has been facing quite a few issues where the different Middle East countries have been fighting against terror with the Western community and more importantly with the local terrorist organizations that have been working in different parts of Middle East. Along with the increased concerns and issues that have been contributing to the destabilization of Middle East economy, political situation, social situation has led to growing concerns regarding the safety of people in this part of the world. Therefore, as per Kingsley (2013), it can be said that the Middle East is one of the most adversely affected regions in the world that has been affected by the terrorism. Since 9/11 terrorist attacks, Middle East along with some other Muslim countries has been under the cloud of aggression and constant terrorism which has been reducing the overall performance of the countries. As per Khalili (2013), he states the that effect of the terrorism and other internal collisions between different Middle East countries, United Nations along with other NATO forces has been influencing the society and has been trying to impose their opinion and decisions upon the well-established Middle Eastern countries. This has been considered by some communities as a positive help and support where the foreign military has been intervening within the Middle East to stabilize the system and to empower the Arab countries and the people. On the other hand, a group of people and political experts have been of this opinion that excessive intervention of the foreign military and their intervention has been the major cause of concern in the region which has eventually destabilized the state system and also the society (Kingsley, 2013). Discussion As the Berberoglu, (2015) confirms, since the September 9/11 attacks, Middle East has been facing the consequences as United States along with the NATO forces has actually intervene in various Middle East countries and is trying to impose the rules and regulations and is also looking to fight against the terrorist organizations such as the ISIS and the Taliban. It is quite important to understand that in most situations the different terrorism organizations have actually been introduced to negate the policies of the foreign military which has been quite influential in different countries and has been affecting them in the most adverse manner. Along with this, in the modern era, the most integral and common issue that has been discussed worldwide has been the war between Israel and the Palestine where Palestinians have been brutally killed by the Israel forces. The support that has been provided to the Israel at all world forums has made the country stronger and it has eventually destabilized the Palestinians and it has adversely affected the society (Piketty, 2015). Causes of Destabilisation in the Middle East Foreign military intervention in the Middle East in the 21st century has destabilised the state and the Middle East in the most negative manner where countries such as Iran, Syria, and Palestine have been under the influence of the foreign military. As per Inhorn (2015), this action of the foreign militaries has led to declining economy, political stability, social sustainability and the technological advancement all has been affected in the negative manner which has reduced the overall performance and competency of these specific countries. During the past decade or so the increased intervention of the different militaries and also the governments has become a major reason of wars, unrest and peaceful conditions and situations. For instance, the Syrian war against the other Middle East countries has also heightened with the focus of the foreign military where it should have not actually interfered the local issues of the governments. The increased intervention of the governments from other parts of the world actually was the reason that leads to an extended war among the two major countries of the Middle East (Morrissey, 2016). This again confirms the fact that role of foreign military in the destabilization has been immense and it is a continuous process where the foreign stakeholders in spite being directly part of the whole situation tend to exploit the situation and find positive and benefits out of it. As per the research overall the results and the outcome has been entirely based upon the consequences faced by the different countries due to increased interventions that have caused unrest and unjust situation. People living in this part of the world in the modern era has been facing several issues including poor economic outcome, poor health of the children, poor education systems and also the living standard has also declined in the most negative manner. This is also a reflection as to how the violence caused by the different foreign forces has had over the general public. Gettleman (2003) has stated that the extreme violence has been only occurred due to the intervention where the support of the western world has been upon their personal interest and gain which has directly and also indirectly affected the outcome and condition in the society. Therefore it can be said that the major cause of concern has been evident because of the poor strategies applied by the local bodies during the 21th century. The people were the major stakeholders that had to suffer in the entire situation, therefore the reliance on the people and the population has been confirmed as the issue that has been directly proportion to the extreme violence in the society (Cook, 2013). In spite being physically distant between the Middle East and the foreign military has actually influenced within the region. Throughout the 21th century, the strategic interest has been including the longstanding competition within all the Middle East countries. The western world has been particularly accessing the Middle East that has been long standing motivation with respect to the strong culture that has been related to the interest groups which have been serving the United States foreign policy. Stacher, (2013), the direct and also the indirect economic forums in the modern era have been quite badly affected and were also vocal for this overall mishap and chaotic issues that led to poor economic situations which led to unstable outcome for the local stakeholders. It becomes pivotal on part of the past where the Middle East was affected in the negative manner. Along with this, another factor which confirms the fact that Middle East has been destabilized with the intervention of the foreign military can also be evidently viewed with the changing relationships among different Muslim countries that were friends and brothers in the past (Ismael, 2017). Tension between Arab countries For instance, as per Owen (2002), the growing tension between Iran, Saudi Arabia and Syria is a reflection of the influence of the foreign military that has been directing the governments and that has been leading to increasing political uncertainties among the different governments. Furthermore, the intervention of the foreign military has also destabilized the governments where they have lost control over the oil and its bi-products. In addition to this, the outcome of the study does confirm the fact that Middle East has been facing severe challenges from the different areas which are related to the extensive intervention of the military which has led to different sanctions on the Arab countries. This extreme intervention has again been a concern and has been considered an unethical move because by doing so the local people have been deprived of the basic necessities of life which include food, health, education and shelter. Therefore military intervention is one of the most negatively perceived interventions within the Middle East by the different foreign militaries (Rupesinghe, 2016). Some of the researchers in the recent times have been vocal about the fact that the foreign military extremism has been quite widespread because of the growing economies of certain Middle Eastern countries. To actually restrict their growth and independence, the foreign militaries by one way or the other has tried to force their way in those countries and has tried to dictate and control the decision making with the countries. Therefore, the extreme violence has also been quite a common attribute in the Arab countries in the Middle East which has all been because of the intervention from the foreign militaries. The direct attacks on the societies were the major cause of extreme killings of poor and innocent people of the Middle Eastern countries (McWilliams, 2005). Moreover, the governments and the states in every war were affected badly and the economy along with the political situation went on to destabilize the society which was a gruelling factor. It can be openly said that the biased decision making of the western military was the major cause of instability in the region and it is still being faced by the people where the Arab countries are still under the influence of Western and more importantly the foreign military. In some situations, the intervention of foreign military has been possible because of the poor relationships among the modern Arab countries. In various instances, the foreign militaries have actually taken the advantage of tension between Arab countries and have imposed their decisions which have led to weak democracy and control over the different countries within the Middle East. Therefore, it can be said that in most instances the poor relationships among the Arab countries has been a major cause of destabilization in the region (Fawcett, 2013). Conclusion In the end, it can be said that the intervention of the foreign within the Middle East has been the major cause of destabilization. Although in some countries it has been inevitable to take help and support of the foreign aid in terms of military guidance and support, but overall the intervention has destabilized the society and the government which has eventually increased various concerns that have been related to increased political unrest between certain countries. Furthermore, Owen (2002), has confirmed that in the future it becomes absolutely vital for the foreign militaries to reduce the presence and let the local stakeholders become the decision makers and they should be the ones that should be made to become the decision makers in their respective countries. Therefore, it is important on part of all the Arab countries to take control of the current situation and should look to take their independent decisions rather than being dependant over the foreign military to make decisions for them. Once the situation becomes practical and the Arab governments are empowered to make decisions the future shall become rather improved where the local population shall find better ways of living. With the different terrorism activities and groups becoming stronger the intervention of foreign military has increased which eventually has reduced the control of the local governments in the society which is one of the major causes of concern for people of Middle East (Roach, 2014). References Barney, G.O., 2013. The Global 2000 Report to the President of the US: Entering the 21st Century: The Technical Report (Vol. 2). Elsevier. Berberoglu, B. ed., 2016. Beyond the global capitalist crisis: The world economy in transition. Routledge. Bouchard, C., Peterson, J. and Tocci, N., 2013. Multilateralism in the 21st century: Europe’s quest for effectiveness. Routledge. Cook, B.I., Smerdon, J.E., Seager, R. and Coats, S., 2014. Global warming and 21st century drying. Climate Dynamics, 43(9-10), pp.2607-2627. Fawcett, L., 2013. International relations of the Middle East. Oxford University Press. Gettleman, M, E, Schaar, S (2003) The Middle East and Islamic World Reader, U.S.: Grove Press p. 248. Inhorn, M.C. and Patrizio, P., 2015. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century. Human reproduction update, p.dmv016. Inhorn, M.C. and Patrizio, P., 2015. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century. Human reproduction update, p.dmv016. Ismael, T.Y. ed., 2017. The International Relations of the Middle East in the 21st Century: Patterns of continuity and change. Routledge. Khalili, Laleh. “Thinking about Violence.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 45, no. 4 (2013): 791 –794. Kingsley, Patrick. “Killing in Cairo: The Full Story of the Republican Guards Club Shooting.” Guardian, July 18, 2013. Kirkpatrick, David, Peter Baker, and Michael Gordon. “How American Hopes for a Deal in Egypt were Undercut.” New York Times, August 17, 2013. Kontorovich, A.E., Epov, M.I. and Eder, L.V., 2014. Long-term and medium-term scenarios and factors in world energy perspectives for the 21st century. Russian Geology and Geophysics, 55(5-6), pp.534-543. Lelieveld, J., Beirle, S., Hörmann, C., Stenchikov, G. and Wagner, T., 2015. Abrupt recent trend changes in atmospheric nitrogen dioxide over the Middle East. Science advances, 1(7), p.e1500498. McWilliams, W, C, Piotrowski, H, (6th ed.)(2005) The World since 1945: A History of International Relations U.S. Lynne Rienner Publishers p 154 Morrissey, J., 2016. US Central command and liberal imperial reach:‘Shaping the Central region for the 21st Century’. The Geographical Journal, 182(1), pp.15-26. Owen, R, Louis, R(2002) A Revolutionary year: The Middle East in 1958, U.K.: I.B. Tauris & Co,. Ltd,  Piketty, T., 2015, April. A historical approach to property, inequality and debt: reflections on capital in the 21st century. In CESifo Forum (Vol. 16, No. 1, p. 40). Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (Ifo). Roach, S.C., Griffiths, M. and O'Callaghan, T., 2014. International relations: the key concepts. Routledge. Rupesinghe, K. ed., 2016. Internal conflict and governance. Springer. Stacher. “Deeper Militarism in Egypt.” Middle East Institute Transitions Project, September 16, 2013. http://www.mei.edu/content/deeper-militarism-egypt Stacher. “Egypt Transformed by State Violence.” New Left Project, September 18, 2013. Read More