StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Consumer Law - Abouzaid v Mothercare Ltd - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
From the paper "Consumer Law - Abouzaid v Mothercare Ltd" it is clear that generally speaking, Abouzaid v Mothercare (UK) Ltd – the mother of the claimant had purchased a Cosytoes sleeping bag in 1990 which was attached to the pushchair by elastic straps. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.1% of users find it useful
Consumer Law - Abouzaid v Mothercare Ltd
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Consumer Law - Abouzaid v Mothercare Ltd"

What has the case of ABOUZAID V MOTHERCARE (UK) LTD added to the area of the development of negligence since Donoghue V Stevenson and the Consumer protection act. Points to use for a presentation 1. Briefly outline the facts of the case, which are as follows Abouzaid v Mothercare (UK) Ltd – the mother of the claimant had purchased a Cosytoes sleeping bag in 1990 which was attached to the pushchair by elastic straps. The claimant, aged 12, was helping his mother attach the product to his younger brother’s pushchair when one of the straps slipped and lashed back. The buckle attached to the strap hit the claimant in the eye and caused permanent serious damage to the boy. The claim against the respondent was brought in negligence as well as invoking the requirement of strict liability for the safety of the product under s1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987. Despite the defence offered by the respondent the court of appeal found in favour of the claimant on the basis of strict liability, even though the court accepted that the respondent had not been negligent. 2. Discuss the defences offered by Mothercare Mothercare asserted they were not liable because (a) the product could not be regarded as defective as there had been no previous instances of this type and therefore they had no reason to believe that there was any need to change the design to prevent such a thing from happening (b) if the product was to be regarded as defective, Mothercare argued that they were entitled to use s4(1) (e) of the Consumer Protection Act which states that a producer could avoid liability if the state of scientific and technical knowledge at the relevant time was not such that a producer of products of the same description as the product in question might be expected to have discovered the defect if it had existed in his products while they were under his control (c) they had not acted negligently as it was not reasonably foreseeable that such an accident might occur (d) the claimant had been careless in attempting to attach the product and so was partly responsible for his own injury. 3. Discuss the reasons why the above defences were rejected by the court of appeal In the first hearing the court held Mothercare liable for the injuries and also rejected any claim for contributory negligence on the part of the claimant. It was not made clear at the first hearing whether the ruling had been based on negligence or strict liability or both which led to Mothercare lodging an appeal. At the appeal hearing the court clarified the position, stating that the ruling was based on the defectiveness of the product and not the negligence of the producer. The appeal court rejected the defence offered under s4(1)(e) of the CPA 1987 in relation to the development risk defence. 4. Key issues considered by the court of appeal (a) Had there been a breach of the duty of care by Mothercare? (b) Could the product be regarded as defective as described by s3 CPA 1987 (c) Could Mothercare rely on the development defence under s4(1)(e) CPA 1987 Breach of duty of care In reaching their decision the court found that Mothercare had not breached their duty of care to the claimant and that no prudent producer could have anticipated the risk. Liability therefore hinged on determining whether the product could be deemed to be defective. Defective product as described by s3 CPA 1987 S3 CPA 1987 states that (1) Subject to the following provisions of this section, there is a defect in a product for the purposes of this Part if the safety of the product is not such as persons generally are entitled to expect; and for those purposes "safety", in relation to a product, shall include safety with respect to products comprised in that product and safety in the context of risks of damage to property, as well as in the context of risks of death or personal injury. (2) In determining for the purposes of subsection (1) above what persons generally are entitled to expect in relation to a product all the circumstances shall be taken into account, including— (a) the manner in which, and purposes for which, the product has been marketed, its get-up, the use of any mark in relation to the product and any instructions for, or warnings with respect to, doing or refraining from doing anything with or in relation to the product; (b) what might reasonably be expected to be done with or in relation to the product; and (c) the time when the product was supplied by its producer to another; and nothing in this section shall require a defect to be inferred from the fact alone that the safety of a product which is supplied after that time is greater than the safety of the product in question. In determining whether the product was defective the court looked at whether the design of the product allowed the risk of injury to arise. In summing up Pill LJ stated I have come to the conclusion that, though the case is close to the borderline, the product was defective within the meaning of the Act. The risk is in losing control of an elastic strap at a time when it is stretched and eyes are in the line of recoil. The product was defective because it was supplied with a design which permitted the risk to arise and without giving a warning that the user should not so position himself that the risk arose. Members of the public were entitled to expect better from the appellants. A factor in that expectation is the vulnerability of the eye and the serious consequences which may follow from a blunt injury to the eye. Expectations would be different if the worst which could occur was an impact of elastic on the hand. It is not necessary for the Court to determine precisely what more should have been done. It is clear that more could have been done, for example a non-elasticated method of attachment or instructions to fasten the straps from behind the seat unit, together with a warning. The court determined that if the product could be regarded as being defective in 1999 when the case was being heard that the product would also have been defective in 1990 as this was the first occasion in which such an injury had occurred. Possible defence under Section 4(1)(e) CPA 1987 The respondents in this case were attempting to rely on lack of ‘scientific and technical knowledge’ based on the absence of a comparable accident at the time the product had been supplied. They claimed that a producer could only be expected to discover the defect if similar accidents had been reported. Pill LJ rejected this argument stating In my judgment that argument fails first on the ground that the defect, as defined, was present whether or not previous accidents had occurred … The defect which gave rise to the risk was just as likely (or unlikely) to lead to an accident in 1990 as it was in 1999. Knowledge of previous accidents is not an ingredient necessary to a finding that a defect, within the meaning of the section, is present. Different considerations apply to negligence at common law where foreseeability of injury, as defined in the authorities, is a necessary ingredient. Secondly, I am very doubtful whether, in the present context, a record of accidents, comes within the category of ‘scientific and technical knowledge’. The defence contemplates scientific and technical advances which throw additional light, for example, on the propensities of materials and allow defects to be discovered. There are no such advances here. In his view that the finding that there was a defect concluded the case against the appellants, I agree with the judge … I would dismiss this appeal. The court was of the opinion that the defect could have been discovered by performing a practical test and that there was no need for any advances in scientific or technical knowledge in order that the respondent should consider conducting such a test. The court believed that the only reason such a test had not been carried out was because the manufacturers had not thought about doing one. 5. Summarise what the case has added to the development of negligence (a) this case demonstrates that there it is not essential to prove that the respondent has breached a duty of care in order to establish a claim for personal injury (b) under the strict liability criteria of the CPA 1987 a respondent can be held liable for personal injury if the product can be deemed to be defective, regardless of whether the manufacturer possessed the knowledge of the potential danger or not. (c) A producer will only be able to rely on the development of risks defence if there has been an advance is scientific or technical knowledge since the product was first supplied. (d) In determining whether the product can be regarded as defective the key element to be considered by the court id the consumers expectations of safety of that product. In this particular case the product was deemed to be defective. This can be contrasted with the case of Richardson v LRC Products [2000] Lloyds Report Med 280, in which the court held that the producer could not be held liable for a condom that ruptured whilst the claimant was using it. This was based on the fact that a consumer was not entitled to expect any method of contraception to be 100% effective. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“CONSUMER LAW Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
CONSUMER LAW Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1551861-consumer-law
(CONSUMER LAW Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
CONSUMER LAW Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1551861-consumer-law.
“CONSUMER LAW Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1551861-consumer-law.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Consumer Law - Abouzaid v Mothercare Ltd

The Law of International Trade: Nike Shoes

In 'abouzaid v mothercare (UK) Ltd', claim for the defective product as successful as the Court of Appeal held that product supplied was below the standard of safety of the public and hence was entitled to claim damages under CPA.... In the paper 'The law of International Trade: Nike Shoes' the author analyzes rights for claiming damages under the Sale of Goods Act 1979 for the defective product supplied.... Defective products victim can claim compensation either under SOGA or under CPA or under the law of Contract (LOC)....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

Consumers and the Law

A case was filed against mothercare ltd, UK under the Consumer Protection Act and the claim against damage under the Common Law of negligence on the part of the seller of the good.... ltd is a perfect example of a violation of Consumer Rights.... This essay "Consumers and the law" talks about order to protect the rights of the customers who are the consumers of the product and services.... ence, after nearly escaping to lose one's sight a positive step to appeal for the Consumer Protection law was taken....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

British Consumer Law

Though the claim of damages in negligence was overruled by the court, it was held that mothercare ltd was still liable under the Consumer Protection Act strict liability provision because defect in the product is always a major consideration over the level of care exercised by the consumer and in the case of defect in the product, exercise of care may not necessarily protect the manufacturer from ensuring that there are no defects with their products6.... n abouzaid v....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

New Liabilities Under The Consumer Protection Act 1987

Negligence could not be proved against mothercare.... Injury and evidence that injury was caused by a defective product that is all that was required to make mothercare pay compensation for that injury suffered by the claimant.... The act now removes this bottleneck and a customer can already sue a supplier without proof of negligence, under sale of produce law.... This law applies equal rights to anyone injured by the defective product whether or not the good was sold to them....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Analysis of Brians and Alberts Tort Case and Jamess Dismissal and Subsequent Recourse

The claimant sued Mothercare, the supplier of the product, claiming damages in negligence and also under the Consumer Protection Act' ('abouzaid v.... In advising Cretins ltd.... Mothercare (UK) ltd.... Albert asked James (Phillip's younger brother and sales associate at Cretins ltd.... 'Personal injury is a broad umbrella term that encapsulates many more subspecialties of law practice.... In the UK, 'Product liability law defines a defective product as existing when the safety of the product is below that which consumers are entitled to expect....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Application of Product Liability in the UK- the Company Outback

This case study looks at the relevant sections of the consumer Protection Act and EEC directives in regard to tort liabilities and some court judgments to suggest that the company is in a position to successfully defend the case and escape crippling financial penalties.... European Economic Community directive 85/374 and the UK consumer Protection Act 1987 are stringent with regard to the product liability in cases involving the safety of products causing death or damages to the customer....
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study

Consumer Law and Its Rights

This work describes consumer law and its rights in detail.... There are some cases that happened with Helen and the author of this work shows the peculiarities of consumer law on the example of these cases.... From this case study, it is clear that consumers can be cheated due to ignorance of consumer law.... Dealing first with the issue of misrepresentation and the possible actions available for such a claim, it is necessary to examine the law on misrepresentation....
18 Pages (4500 words) Case Study

Consumer Protection Legal Issues

In abouzaid v mothercare (UK) (2000), a 12-year-old boy was injured while fitting a child's sleeping bag to a pushchair.... (Source should be included referring to the law).... The paper entitled 'consumer Protection Legal Issues' presents The Toys4U case that raises the following legal issues; Sale of defective goods, consumer protection legal issues, incorporation of exemption clauses, company directors, and, discrimination....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us