StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Relativity of Science - Book Report/Review Example

Not dowloaded yet

Extract of sample
Relativity of Science

Thesis Modern science operates with a limited number of concepts and models which do not allow a scientist to explain the nature of processes but to describe them.
Steven Weinberg is the Nobel Prize-winning physicist, who spends much of his life working in a laboratory and testing weak force theories and electromagnetic interaction in particles. Steven Weinberg provides readers with credible and accurate information on the topic based on his own observations and conclusions. According to Weinberg, the evidence for any claim must be clear to every person who would question the event or a process. Science always operates in the present, so every explanation must be supported by evidence currently available to a scientist. Weinberg explains that theoretical explanations of events or processes must be strong enough to interpret them and lead to conclusions. For instance, we know that snow is a form of water composed on small particle. Modern science describes this process but it cannot explain why ice crystals formed. They just describe that water can turn into ice influenced by low temperature and atmospheric pressure.
The only limitation of Weinberg's article is subjectivity of the author's personal view and understanding of the world. Taking into account his own work and laboratory experimenters, Weinberg writes that the science attempts to disclose about atoms and the solar system and even about microbes and bacteria would still be true even if human beings had never existed. Thus, science uses concepts and models which only describe events but cannot unveil their true nature and the beginning of all processes. Weinberg tells readers that modern science has interesting findings, but most of them are difficult to interpret. Following Weinberg, theoretical models are developed by people that no longer adhered to new scientific principles based on explanations and description of events and processes. Collins (44) supports the same ideas explaining that modern science is subjective in nature and cannot help scientists to investigate and understand true nature of physics. The most well-known models are the theory of atoms in molecular and theory of relativity. Physics only describes these processes but cannot explain them (Collins 45).
Steven Weinberg proposes readers logical explanation based on real life examples and observations. "Scientists who do pure rather than applied research commonly tell the public and funding agencies that their mission is the explanation of some thing or other" (936). Weinberg underlines that modern scientific standards propose low levels, with every paper containing a new "model" with its own terms inscribed in circles all connected to one another by arrows. So, the work of the philosopher of science should be limited to an investigation of the standards and procedures that have informed scientific value. The main problem of modern science is that it displays the standards and procedures that have been utilized during various theoretical model. The main limitation of descriptive nature of sconce is that scientific knowledge tries to educate scientists about proper evaluative practice. No such recommendation is countenanced on the theoretical nature of any knowledge. Instead, the scientists should remain neutral.
Contemporary scientists are left free to apply, modify, or ...Show more

Summary

In the article "Can science explain everything Anything" Steven Weinberg discusses the subjective nature of modern science and its limitations for a modern man. The author states that modern science cannot explain events and processes but it just describes these processes giving some explanations on nature and outcomes of physical events…
Author : amelielarson
Relativity of Science essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the book report/review on your topic
"Relativity of Science"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Related Essays

Leadership and the New Science by Margaret Wheatley
With this fact in mind, Margaret Wheatley tries to establish different approaches to establishing and managing organization based on the already proven theories of science. She further notes in her series of writings that human organizations sometimes fail due to the absence of systematic approach to solve issues of their organizations especially regarding conflicts and change adjustment needs which is an obvious process that is suggested through scientific problem solving that could only be used by those whose minds are open to major innovations in management.
9 pages (2250 words) Book Report/Review
Science and Engineering
They believe in its full potential to uplift UK economy. It also offers answers to most of the biggest issues of today, claimed Silva. The Council of Science and Technology found a few points to be improved in the government's nanotechnology agenda. The reports suggested that thorough research on toxicology of nanotechnology needs more funding, and if not released will make UK economy suffer.
1 pages (250 words) Book Report/Review
The Shadow Our Future Throws by Al Gore
The chapter in which he elaborates the theories underlying the questions of globalism and capitalism are detailed in the essay, ‘The Shadow our Future Throws’.The name itself is a signifier that actions can lead to disastrous consequences if we leave progress unchecked. The first theory that Gore mentioned concerned the ‘Chaos Theory’
2 pages (500 words) Book Report/Review
Critique of Social Science
The primary finding in this area as etched out by C. Winter, M. Lockwood and Morrison in their paper titled Value Based Segmentation of Community Stakeholders, demonstrates the fact that without the support of well defined partnerships, the government alone cannot do much.
9 pages (2250 words) Book Report/Review
Computer Science: The Underlying Processes
Website review is assigned as a small assignment whose in depth features and helpful aspects for both the computing society and the students like me in particular is discussed.
3 pages (750 words) Book Report/Review
Robert Cialdini: Influence: Science and Practice
The initial portion of the book dictates about the factors that make us say “yes” to a request. Obviously the most striking idea is that a request in a particular format or style is refused, on the other hand, request for
2 pages (500 words) Book Report/Review
What Are the Limits of Science
The wrecking ball concept is actually an eccentric thought of Hume. According to it, any truth regarding the originality of an idea can only be obtained by the experiences that a person faces
1 pages (250 words) Book Report/Review
History and Philosophy Science
He further illustrates that no creative school recognizes a grouping of work that is a creative success, but is not an addition to the group’s communal achievement. According to him, if we doubt, as many do, that
10 pages (2500 words) Book Report/Review
Spark: The Revolutionary New Science of Exercise and the Brain
In this book, Ratey uses his skills as a psychiatrist to advance his research on the clinical uses of exercises on the improvement of mental health. As a psychiatrist, he centers on major mental illnesses such as stress, attention deficit, depression, addiction, anxiety, menopause and menstrual disorders.
3 pages (750 words) Book Report/Review
Get a custom paper written
by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT
Comments (0)
Rate this paper:
Thank you! Your comment has been sent and will be posted after moderation