StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Law of Patents - Case Study Example

Not dowloaded yet

Extract of sample
Law of Patents

Purchasing Associates, Inc. v Weitz, 13 NY2d 267, 269 (1963). It should be noted that federal courts will look to the state laws when interpreting the reasonableness of a covenant not to compete or a non competition clause.
Thus the first question is where is Frothy Beer located The reason why the situs of Frothy Beer is important is because a reasonable inference of the facts indicates that part of the non-competition agreement states that jurisdiction of any dispute pursuant ot the agreement is within the United States. Judging by the information supplied, Frothy Beer is located in the United States. Because the headquarters of Awessa is located in Australia, Federal Court is the court of jurisdiction because of diversity of citizenship. Vaden v. Discover Bank --- S.Ct. ----, 2009 WL 578636 U.S. (2009).
By way of example, if Frothy Beer was located in Virginia, then the federal courts would look to the state of Virginia codes in evaluating the non competition clause between Frothy and Eyus. ...
Meissel v. Finley, 198 Va. 577, 579 (Va.Ct.App.1956) ("The possession of trade secrets and confidential information is an important consideration in testing the reasonableness of a restriction on competition.") (citing Stoneman v. Wilson, 169 Va. 239, 240 (Va.1937)). However, Paramount Termite Control Co., Inc. v. Rector, 238 Va. 171, 172 (Va.1989) notes that "Although often used as a justification for non-competition agreements, it is not necessary that the employees actually had acquired or possessed specific information that could be legally defined as confidential or a trade secret, ....")(internal quotations omitted). Here, the federal court would determine, in effect, whether Frothy Beer did or did not have any legitimate business interests worthy of protection. As a result, the district court's analysis of the restrictive covenant (here the non competition agreement) will likely be skewed by the fact that Eyus developed and applied for patents directly related to research and development of beer product within his first two years of employment at Awessa.
II. While It Appears at First Blush That Awessa Can Enter into an agreement with U.S.B. Beer, all Environmental Issues in regards to the low carb beer production should first be resolved by Awessa before U.S.B. Beer enters into any transaction or memorandum of understanding.

A patent may be awarded for either a product or a process: a product patent creates a monopoly over the manufacture, use and sale of product while a process patent creates a monopoly over the manufacture, use, and sale of a process. U.S. v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle, m.b.H. 670 F.2d ...Show more

Summary

This communication serves as advisory memorandum based upon the facts presented to this office by U.S.B. Chief Financial Officer, Butch Dodge. The first issue presented is the agreement signed by Gene Eyus (Gene). The agreement is between Gene and his prior employer (Frothy Beer) and it is purported to be inter alia a non-competition clause in his employment contract with Frothy Beer which, if valid would prohibit him from working for a competitor in an R&D capacity for one year following his departure from Frothy Beer…
Author : lueilwitzcreola
Law of Patents Case Study essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the case study on your topic
"Law of Patents Case Study"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Related Essays

Case study about business law
The style was favored by the good pay they offered – as compared to their competitors, including Foxconn. The basis of their productivity skills was their use of non-patented technologies: combining them to create their innovation. BYD used the tactics of assimilating trained staff from Foxcomm, for example Liu Xianjun who had received 7 years of training.
4 pages (1000 words) Case Study
Business Law (Case study)
The main issue that comes into effect in this case is that, within a period of three months after signing the contract, X undergoes a physical injury, which renders him unable to use the health facility for a period of 6 months. Further, X's brother is not able to make use of the health club facility since he has relocated to Phoenix, Arizona which is a place more than 25 miles from the present vicinity of the health club, and moreover, he cannot make use of his present membership in Silver's Gym in that place.
3 pages (750 words) Case Study
Commercial Law/Case study
At the outset it is important to outline and briefly discuss the legal issues involved in the case. The statutory provisions contained in the Sale of Goods Act, 1979 read with Section 15 of the Supply of Goods (Implied Terms Act, 1973) are attracted along with other relevant case law.
6 pages (1500 words) Case Study
Patents and Trademark Law
Looking at the facts and circumstances underlying the case of Tom and Pete Soil manufacturers of gardening equipment, which they introduced in spring 2006, they have a right to prevent their competitors FR and ED and Salisbury supermarkets by inventing and selling the product.
6 pages (1500 words) Case Study
Land Law (case study)
In legal parlance, a restrictive covenant is one in which the covenantee is restrained, or prohibited from performing a deed or action, mutually agreed upon, by covenant. Although restrictive covenants of the kind seen above between the original owner and the co-owner are valid under law, a question would arise whether similar restrictive covenant would be enforceable in the event of a new purchaser coming into the scene.
4 pages (1000 words) Case Study
Land Law Case Study
Legal owners mean people who are named on the title documents and the number of them would not exceed four. "Where the property is registered in the public District Land Registry (as all properties bought on or after 3 December 1990 will be), the legal owners are the people listed as the "registered proprietors".
6 pages (1500 words) Case Study
Company Law Case Study
The most utilized form of business is corporation.1 Many successful and well-known business companies come in this form like Microsoft, Nokia, and Friendster. They are in fact corporations. One point being considered is that forming a corporation is moderate in terms of burden and cost since there are usually more people who share in the capital and who join hands in running the business.
6 pages (1500 words) Case Study
Copyright Law Case Study
An important example of this is the peer-to-peer file sharing system of copyrighted music. The Napster and Grokster cases are a good illustration of the legal responsibility of the industries.The copyright industries themselves have responded with new business strategies by providing legal download services.
12 pages (3000 words) Case Study
Law Case Study - B
Consequently, this definition may be rightly put to imply the neglect of the use of ordinary care or skill towards a person to whom
1 pages (250 words) Case Study
Case study
Copyright would help protect Ellen’s skill, printing, digital content, images, music, broadcasts, sound recording, and databases. Copyright is granted automatically and will not need Ellen to apply for it. The advantage
3 pages (750 words) Case Study
Get a custom paper written
by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT
Comments (0)
Rate this paper:
Thank you! Your comment has been sent and will be posted after moderation