College
Essay
Miscellaneous
Pages 8 (2008 words)
Download 0
In the U.S., hierarchy of courts comprises of District Courts, Appeals Courts, and Supreme Court in both State and Federal Jurisdictions. District courts, whose main function is to make findings of facts, should follow the precedents of their higher courts namely Appeals Courts and Supreme Court…

Introduction

Next to appeals court is the Supreme Court in every state jurisdiction who decides on the appeals against the decisions of the Appeals Courts. Above the State Supreme Court is the federal, i.e the U.S. Supreme Court which can hear appeals against the decisions of the State Supreme Court and the decisions of the U.S. Circuit court of Appeals.1
This paper enquires into what extent doctrine of precedent depends on the hierarchy of courts. Otherwise called stare decisis, it enjoins the lower courts to follow their superior courts' decisions in matters of law and in a way it is an implied mandate of superior courts which the lower courts are bound to follow. The idea of following the precedents is to have uniformity in decisions though not at the cost of justice. Besides, the principle of stare decisis enables stability and predictability of law's directions so that one can plan for future actions. Question arises whether the lower court (constrained court) should blindly follow the superior court's (precedent court's) dictum or situations can arise wherein the constrained court can not simply follow the precedent in a unique condition. For example the precedent court faced with facts A, B, and C decides in favour of the plaintiff. In a later case, the constrained court finds fact C is absent and hence whether it can decide for defendant. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Law of Contract, Case Law
Mutual assent is manifested in an offer, acceptance, and consideration. An offer is an indication by one party, offeror of a willingness to enter into a contract with another party, offered on some specific terms. A valid offer creates a power exclusively in the hands of the offeree such that all that is needed to form a contract is acceptance. If one or more of the terms are missing from the…
Case Law
Next to appeals court is the Supreme Court in every state jurisdiction who decides on the appeals against the decisions of the Appeals Courts. Above the State Supreme Court is the federal, i.e the U.S. Supreme Court which can hear appeals against the decisions of the State Supreme Court and the decisions of the U.S. Circuit court of Appeals.1…
Controlling Case Law
It was her custom to stop home during a break in shifts but little did I know on that fateful day, that that one break would be her last. She was only 18 yrs old but well on her way to becoming an independent woman. Ultimately, the killer was convicted of 3 counts, murder, rape, and assault and sentenced to life in prison. The District Attorney asked me if I wished to request the death penalty for…
Case Law: Doctrine of Estoppel, Constructive Trust
Now we shall analyze the scope of doctrine of estoppel on which Mr. Dinnock relies for his claim and constructive trust by which he can have benefit by law. For this, firstly we shall explore the meaning of these terms.…
Case Law: MIKE vs FF LTD
But here the rule related to the ample scope of "caveat emptor "plays an important role in impeding the purchaser in taking the action against the vendor for the disposal of defective constructions.…
Statutory and Case Law
The word statute typically refers to a law, e.g., The Patriot Act, passed by a state legislature or the U.S. Congress that commands, prohibits, or declares something. It is sometimes called legislation. State and federal court cases often involve statutory interpretation, and enactment of a statute may well reverse an established case law precedent. Nevertheless, it is easy to overlook the…
Case Law Study in Ratio Decidendi
After this the type of effect that this case has on the Magistrates' Courts of Queensland is discussed and explained. Subsequently, the question of law that the court had to address is discussed, along with the reason as to how the Court reached its decision. After this the steps that the police could have taken in their investigation are discussed.…