The relatively new yet strong agreement in the West that human rights can actually be universal or rather they are universal is being hotly contested by other nations of the world especially the Asian countries. This consensus raises more questions than it answers…
And on the other, we have poor countries like India and Bangladesh where people do not even have enough to consume. How can these two different types of societies develop similar definitions of human rights or implement similar human right laws Human rights for someone in India may be having enough to eat and a place to keep oneself warm, while it has an entirely different meaning for someone in the United States. But human rights can and should be universal in nature as we shall discover from our discussion in this paper.
All human rights are universal, indivisible and interdependent and interrelated. The international community must treat human rights globally in a fair and equal manner, on the same footing, and with the same emphasis. While the significance of national and regional particularities and various historical, cultural and religious backgrounds must be borne in mind, it is the duty of States, regardless of their political, economic and cultural systems, to promote and protect all human rights and fundamental freedoms. (United Nations 1993)
But West may not be trying to integrate cultures into human rights definition for the sake of stamping its superiority but the main aim was to counter human rights violation in traditionalist Asian societies. The reality of an interdependent world has only recently dawned upon us and this has brought cultures and societies closer accentuating their differences. But these differences and the resulting furor over the concept of human rights being universal should not undermine the idea that world is interdependent and more closely linked than we previously assumed. The Declaration's provision of basic civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights for "all members of the human family" has helped the world understand that we need "a common standard of achievement for all peoples and nations."(UN, 1948) The fact that United Nations chose to develop a new definition of human rights which it believes can be universally applies show its faith in human beings' "substantial capacity for moral understanding and progress." (Nickel: p. 41)
The concept of human rights is not something new and can be traced back to philosophies of antiquity but it was in the last few centuries that they began taking their present form. However the inclusion of universalism in human rights is one concept which is not even a few decades old. Many events, declarations and globalization later we can summarize fundamental tenets of human rights law as follows:
Every human being has certain rights that are inherent. Such rights can be enumerated or deduced; they are not earned or acquired but inhere in all people by virtue of their humanity alone.
Every human being's basic rights are indefeasible or inalienable--that is, such rights can never be annulled or denied by outside parties or even by the affected individuals themselves.
Conflicts between different rights must be resolved in accordance with just and impartial laws and procedures. (Sieghart, p.8)
Human rights proponents offer some fair definitions of human rights w ...
Cite this document
(“An human rights be universal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/292399-an-human-rights-be-universal
(An Human Rights Be Universal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“An Human Rights Be Universal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/292399-an-human-rights-be-universal.
There are many forms of relativism which vary according to the degree of controversy. Relativism is often used for the moral principles, ethics and cultural relativism. Relativism can be of various forms like the philosophical versus the anthropological relativism and normative versus the descriptive relativism.
This sets democracy different from others and makes it more preferred by many. As such, which also leads us to the second premise, democracy, given its democratic institutions and democratic processes and despite its weaknesses, is the best instrument there is today to protect universal human rights.
Aristotle and Kant are two philosophers that are well known in the field of ethics. However, before critically analysing the two philosophers accordingly to their philosophical framework, it is better to have a full grasp or understanding of societal contexts where they are confined.
In this context, according to R.K.M. Smith (2005, p.240), ‘the deprivation of a person’s liberty can only be acceptable when there are serious reasons that impose the detention as the only suitable measure’. However, it seems that
Human rights should be universal as a rule because the world has seen the horrors of the Second World War. But at the same time cultural and religious eccentricities should also be tolerated. This is why pure human and political rights should be universal but socio
However, despite these frameworks being in place, there have been accusations and counteraccusations with the finger being pointed on the western countries for preaching water and taking wine. The whole
There lies a clear connection between the personality type and the satisfaction determinants. Some employees are happy with low work pressure, whereas other workaholic employees feel comfortable around a busy and hectic schedule. This study
rmed 6 major bodies, including the Security Council, the General Assembly, the International Court of Justice, an Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), the Trusteeship Council, and the Secretariat. The Charter of UN authorized ECOSOC to set up commissions in social and economic
13 Pages(3250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic An human rights be universal for FREE!