The principle of universal jurisdiction is recognized in respect of the crime of piracy and war crimes. Since hijacking is generally described as aerial piracy, the principle of universal hijacking applies in respect of the crime of hijacking. By universal jurisdiction in respect of a crime, it is meant that the crime is against the international community and in order to suppress such a crime, all states can exercise jurisdiction in respect of the crime…
Answer: As per the UN Charter of human rights, human rights of all the passengers are violated in this case. According to the International Convention Against Taking of Hostages(1979) the passengers can seek damages for the violation of their human rights.
2. They can argue that they are political criminals fighting for a just cause and are not terrorists, and it is very important principle of the International law that extradition for political crimes is not allowed.
1. The act of USA's military forces gathering just outside Libya's twelve-mile territorial sea, but within plain view of the Libya coastal defense forces is a hostile act and can be considered as an act of war against Libya. USA can not resort to such tactics without clear cut evidence of the participation of the Libyan State in the crime of hijacking, otherwise it has to be considered as a terrorist act committed by some individuals. Even if USA was convinced that the some Libyan Political leaders are clandestinely involved in this crime, in that case USA should have approached the UN security council first to take a collective action for protecting the interests of the passengers on board the aircraft.
Cite this document
(“Hypothetical international law questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/292904-hypothetical-international-law-questions
(Hypothetical International Law Questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Hypothetical International Law Questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/292904-hypothetical-international-law-questions.
The question which arises here is whether Barkley is legally tenable to enter into contracts on behalf of the firm. One of the most fundamental principles of Contract Law is that an individual who is below the age of 18 cannot enter into contracts with other parties.
However, when the question is asked if international law is really “Law,” the intention is not to essentially inquire as to whether or not international law is actually natural law, for this cannot be proven even by adherents of the natural law tradition.
These involves the advancement of evidence that the accused, at the time of committing the offence, knew that he/she was providing material support to a terrorist organization and knew the terrorist organization in question. 2 Terrorism has been defined by different kinds of laws including the following: 1.
This can be said to be the main issue that the courts will deal with as they try to determine whether Mr. White’s actions fall under free speech and the boundaries that have been set for it. Once in trial, the defense will no doubt attempt to argue that the accused was just practicing his right of freedom of expression and simply offering his opinion on a subject to those who would listen to him thus he has done no wrong (Rosen).
Amendment IV of the United States Constitution provides for defense against awkward search or arrest, in addition to calling for a judicially issued warrant that is also sustained by probable cause. This part of the bill of rights that regulates on invasion of privacy is, however, only applicable to searches or arrests conducted by the government but not those done by private organizations or individuals.
Will Espinoza be successful in her defense? Why or why not? 2. Analyze YouTube’s argument that it has complied with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Remember to provide any legal precedent or other evidence that YouTube can use in its defense. Will YouTube be successful in its defense?
ither made in Queensland, made by 1 or more parties carrying on business or residing in Queensland or governed by the law of Queensland (Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (124)(1)(g)). It also states that service is permitted outside Australia if the proceeding is “based on
Other major issues are identification of the partner’s liability and powers to bind the organization while conducting activities in relation to the firm. There are other minor issues which need to be considered in the recovery of your organizations debts, and they