The effect of FDI on host economies has been the subject of extensive research. As pointed out by Hanson (2001), both theory and empirical evidence provide mixed results on the net welfare effect of inward FDI on recipient countries. The attitude towards inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has changed considerably over the last couple of decades, as most countries have liberalized their policies to attract investments from foreign multinational corporations (MNCs). In fact FDI has proved to be resilient during financial crises. For instance, in East Asian countries, such investment was remarkably stable during the global financial crisis of 1997-98. This crisis mainly involved four basic problems (CRS Report, 1998):
Economists argue that the primary cause of the crisis was too much government intervention in economic activity, leading to misdirected and inefficient investments in both public and private projects. As an aftereffect of the crisis short-term capital inflows were viewed as unstable and thus dangerous; long-term capital movements were seen as stable and thus desirable. Therefore an emphasis was put on de-emphasizing short-term capital inflows and encouraging long-term capital inflows, especially FDI which was seen as directly enhancing domestic productive capabilities. There’s one school of thought which puts the blame for this crisis on FDI itself. They argue that the crisis had shown that over-reliance on FDI carried its own dangers. Rapid FDI inflows had been a major factor enabling these countries to maintain their overvalued exchange rates. No doubt such exchange rates helped keep domestic inflation under control, but they also increased East Asian vulnerability to speculative attacks. And therefore it was the drying up of FDI, largely as a result of competition from lower wage countries (especially China) and the mobility of regional investment by
Cite this document
(“Critically discuss using empirical evidence, the various reasons for Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/320030-critically-discuss-using-empirical-evidence-the-various-reasons-for-foreign-direct-investment
(Critically Discuss Using Empirical Evidence, the Various Reasons for Essay)
“Critically Discuss Using Empirical Evidence, the Various Reasons for Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/320030-critically-discuss-using-empirical-evidence-the-various-reasons-for-foreign-direct-investment.
Cited: 0 times
FDI is considered an investment to create or expand a permanent interest in a foreign enterprise. It provides a firm with newer markets and…
Nonetheless, the MNEs need not be large firms, and neither must they be operating in the technologically intensive industries (Huang, 2003, p.73). The main conventional objective of an MNE is to maximize the wealth of the shareholders. The decisions of the MNE will be made towards the achievement of this objective (Multinational Enterprise, n.d).
FDI can also be defined as an investment of a company in a foreign country by building a factory within the host country. It is through a company’s direct investment in machinery, building and equipment in another country that foreign direct investment is made possible.
Eventually, countries will continue to entice high level of investment coming specifically from foreign enterprises. It is believed that trans-national firms will consider this as potentially beneficial for their operations.
Globalisation is also considered as a primary contributor to the methods used to develop foreign direct investments.
Some of these countries became full European Union (EU) members in May 2004. They also experienced a significant increase in foreign direct investment (FDI). As a consequence, the ratio of inward FDI stock to the 12 CEE countries studied here in total world inward FDI stock increased more than three-fold, from 0.81% in 1994 to 2.89% in 2004.
The author states that a multinational firm in a developed country may face higher labor costs and higher production costs when locating its subsidiaries in its own home country, while a shift overseas may involve a larger initial investment but is economically beneficial in the long run because the margin of profits are higher.
(Barrell, 1997) But with the expansion in the economy, on one hand FDI has remained successful in providing full-fledged investment support to the East Asian countries, while on the other hand FDI has created a vacuum for the European states particularly
The main conventional objective of an MNE is to maximize the wealth of the shareholders. The decisions of the MNE will be made towards the achievement of this objective (Multinational Enterprise, n.d). Unlike
rategies that enable entities to diversify its assets and risk across diverse countries by engaging in contractual agreements with multiple potential partners. Companies may find it advantageous by producing in foreign countries compared to exporting to those countries based on
People living with chronic diseases such as diabetes, asthma, epilepsy or even HIV/AIDS often suffer from stress in managing their conditions. In addition, to the stress created at the workplace, school
8 pages (2000 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Critically discuss using empirical evidence, the various reasons for Foreign Direct Investment for FREE!