She quietly sat next to them and saw them nod their heads in agreement to the sermon about making friend and friendships. She also saw their amazed looks when she was introduced, “Mrs. Anne Anderson Rinaldi.”
This anecdote does…
The way the group looked at Anne as she went towards them showed that they were not in the least bit interested in making friends with her. They did not reach out to make her feel welcome. The group being members of the church should have been gracious to welcome her since Anne happens to be the visitor. In fact when Anne reached out to them one turned her back to Anne to block her from communicating with the rest. These actions distinctly showed Anne that she does not belong to the group. The words “From what church are you from?” could have meant something positive like they want to get to know her more and possibly become friends but the succeeding remark, “But your Minister Rinaldi, is a foreigner, right?” and the negative intonation showed disapproval. Even if Anne mentioned that their churches were affiliates, they still didn’t accept Anne as part of their group. Their intention to disassociate from Anne can further be seen when they left her and they did not show interest if she followed them or not.
The way they looked at Anne from under their noses and when they emphasized about Minister Rinaldi being a foreigner shows that they feel that they are higher in stature than Anne and Minister Rinaldi. It appears the women do not approve of the foreigner being a Minister for whatever reason and they also do not approve of Anne for being part of that Foreign Minister’s church.
The group uses non verbal actions to show people they do not like their true feelings for them. They do not want to easily admit people in their tight circle. They would really try to make one feel the odd one out. They initially tried pushing Anne away by not reaching out to her, by moving and turning ones back to her, and by not letting her finish her sentences. They made their final point when they finally left her without cordially saying farewell.
They are typical people who want to make a stand but prefer not to say things ...
Cite this document
(“Discourse Community Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 4”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/381416-discourse-community-analysis
(Discourse Community Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words - 4)
“Discourse Community Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words - 4”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/381416-discourse-community-analysis.
In the study of the teenagers in 16th street in Downtown, Denver, this small group has shown significantly important matters that contribute to the formation of relationships, hierarchy, exclusion and stereotyping. Whatever various things have been observed, it is generally concluded that communication is still a most vital part of a community in expressing the members’ thoughts and ideas as well as what they would want to learn from the society.
The community has the common public goal of seeking to win football games, as well as further develop their skills in football. The team regularly communicates during practice and prep talks. It also has a large collection of video’s clips and books that serve to help the members benefit from the exchange of new knowledge.
Such a community has common objectives and public goals, a participatory scheme that provides the relevant information for members and facilitates feedbacks, a scheme for effective communication among members, a way of making use of one or more communication genres, a more specific lexis and a level of threshold of members with degrees of relevant content in the discourse expertise (Gee, 486).
A discourse community has common goals or interests and uses unique communication to achieve these goals. Ideally, a discourse community has unique and unwritten rules that define the mode of communication and operations in given field. The defined communication and operations in a discourse community refer to discursive practices, which include knowledge on specific terminologies as well as genres like academic papers and debates.
Some of the words or expressions are made up unconsciously. Some are just shorter versions of the real words or expressions. Sometimes, a group is recognized by the words they use. For example, we say “giggled like
I can speak from direct experience since I had once served in the military and knows where I speak of. It is not a bit surprising that when military men meet without even introducing their backgrounds, they can instantly know that this guy comes from a