Contempt of court can be described as any wilful act of disobedience to, or disregard of, or court order or any misconduct in the presence of the court; action that interferes with a judges ability to administer justice or that insults the dignity of the court and contempt of…
ge of its duties, is guilty of contempt…”1 The test as to what constitutes contempt of court was enunciated by Lord Russell in the English case of R v Gray: ‘Any act done or writing published calculated to bring a court or a judge of the court into contempt, or to lower his authority, is a contempt of court.’2 In every court proceeding, what every litigant is in search of is a good judgment and in most court proceedings involving trial by jury, having a good, reasonable and unbiased jury is the key to that.
Taking a view from the Attorney General’s speech, it is true that the law of contempt was meant to arrive at a middle ground between competing interests. There are so many opposing interests to every trial. The law of contempt has at least three fundamental objects – providing a fair trial, ensuring compliance with the court’s orders and generally protecting the administration of justice. If these competing interests are balanced, it is the only way which requires the court process to be fair and that the community accepts the court’s decisions and obeys their orders. It is the duty of the trial judge always to warn the jury of the likely consequences of which any pre-trial publicity may have on the trial. The jury must always and constantly be cautioned to try the case on the basis of the evidence it hears and not on the basis of anything it reads in the newspapers or heard on radio or television. A question that should be asked at this point is that is this a reasonable position? If this is reasonable, how will the law be successful is protecting the rights of those concerned with a trial from intrusion by the media? How does the law attempt to balance the conflicting interest of all parties to the trial, and in particular, in relation to freedom of speech/freedom of the press and the right to a fair trial? Are the any dangers of a miscarriage of justice with regards to pre-trial publicity?
It should be noted that a lot of jurors have become ...
Cite this document
(“LLB Law, Media Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/397404-llb-law-media-law
(LLB Law, Media Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“LLB Law, Media Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/397404-llb-law-media-law.
After all “Marriage can be defined as a socially approved union between unrelated parties that give rise to new families” (Hunter, 1991). In particular “Marriage, whether civil or religious, is a contract, formally entered into. It confers on the parties the status of husband and wife, the essence of the contract being an agreement between a man and a woman to live together, and to love one another as husband and wife, to the exclusion of all others” (SH v.
Usually, there are duties owed to people in different circumstances, and for wrongful or negligent actions, there is liability imposed by law. The key function of the Law of Torts is to offer remedies to those claimants who have suffered loss, infringements of rights or harm, which may include physical injury to property or persons, damage to financial interests and reputations of persons, and interference with a person’s enjoyment and use of their property such as land.
A constructive trust is established where it is seen as being unconscionable for one party to hold a property to which another party has some kind of beneficial right to while denying the second party access or enjoyment of the property. It also ensures that the party that holds the title does not dispose of it in a way that is to the detriment of the second party or without the second party being heard.
The word “charity” is connoted from a Latin word “caritas,” which means care. Generally, a charity signifies generosity towards needy and poor people. However, the legal meaning of the word, “charity” is much wider. It includes other purposes for the welfare of the community as a whole.
The consequence is that the basis of the action is hardly contract. Its real foundation is an obligation which the law imposes on the infant to make a fair payment in respect of needs satisfied. In other words the obligation arises re and not consensus" Fletcher Moulton L.J.
(ARI) which a US privately-owned company. Both companies are deeply involved in development, manufacture and sale of industrial robots and provide services connected with industrial robots. Industrial robots are envisioned in the future to be
Drawing on the media publicity surrounding Ms. Naomi Campbells recent testimony before this special tribunal of Sierra Leone, I explore and critically asses the media phenomenon of - the cult of celebrities and the implications this has for the legal arena.
In addition, Bob’s intention to “silence” Aran from teasing was the intended consequence of his action. Lenny was just an indirect victim of Bob’s criminal conduct (Allen, 2013).
Firstly, Bob’s taking aim at
Consideration is important in a contract since it ensures that only bargains, rather than promises are binding on the parties. This implies that, if X promises something to Y, Y cannot proceed to enforce the promises since Y has provided no
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic LLB Law, Media Law for FREE!