Critical thinking ( Applying Key Criteria ) - Assignment Example

The fact is that the supporters of the accused person had found that a pre- planned action is needed to prevent the opposition made by the members of AFA. The reputation of Fran Lee as the unquestioned leader of the AFA must have haunted the opposition and one can find vested interests in her serious head injury during the violence. One of the supporters of R33 group threw a hard material to Fran Lee and she was seriously injured. The conspirators have foreseen the inevitable presence of the police force in the area and their expertise is evident in the way they converted the demonstrations into violence.

The police displayed neutrality towards both the groups; they kept maximum patience and they have tried to avoid violence. Critically analyzing various incidents that culminated in violence and causalities, one can see that the group Rebirth -1933 had their own vested interests behind the anti-demonstration; they wanted to praise the accused person and for this purpose they planned a secret plot against the Anti Fascist Alliance (AFA). According to the lawyer Fran Lee was injured by the police because the police have used their batons to suppress the violence.

It is clear that the lawyer is biased; he could be an ardent supporter of the accused person and he tries to divert the issue through complaining against the police. The event is a pre-planned action committed by the members of R33 for hiding their leader’s fault. Analyzing the given article one can find that the paper demonstrates the events of a serious political crisis that culminated in violence and immediate conflicts. The incident also highlights that the ability of people to observe such things as this varies; the comments and descriptions of the people who witnessed the violence contrast each other.

It is clear that each of them have their own view points and predictions about the incidents and this underlines that people tend to be more of biased than neutral in their