breach of contract committed in Queensland, regardless of where the contract was made and whether or not the breach was preceded of accompanied by a breach...rendering impossible the performance of a part of the contract that ought to be performed in Queensland” (Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (124)(1)(i)).
In this case, the rules probably will not give the court jurisdiction. The contract was not made in Queensland – the contract was executed in England. It also states that service is permitted if the contract is governed by the law of Queensland. The contract did not state which law governed, so this clause does not have effect.
So, now the other two clauses must be examined – that service would be permitted if the breach of contract was committed in Queensland. Was the breach of contract committed in Queensland? Probably not. The breach occurred in England, as the consignment was packed in England, and the packing of the consignment was the cause of the damage. The other clause is that service is permitted when the contract is made by one or more parties carrying on business or residing in Queensland. The contract was executed by Global Freighting in England, and they do not reside in Queensland. However, they are carrying on business in Queensland, so this might be a basis for service. However, the term “carrying on business” is kind of vague – is it enough that Global Freighting made a contract with a Queensland company – would this be considered to be “carrying on business?”
If this is not a basis for jurisdiction, then we need to look at other connecting factors. They are residence, domicile or presence of defendant in the courts jurisdiction (Akbarali v. Brent LBC). In this case, none of these connecting factors are present – defendant does not reside in Queensland, is not domiciled and has never been to Queensland. Therefore, connecting factors would not give Queensland jurisdiction either.
Plus, the doctrine of ...
Cite this document
(“International Contract jurisdiction hypothetical Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/408497-international-contract-jurisdiction-hypothetical
(International Contract Jurisdiction Hypothetical Essay)
What are the implications of the principle of complementary jurisdiction in the statute of international court with special reference to the role of universal jurisdiction in the international justice system?
Many lawyers are expert and experienced in universal business law but at the same time only very few of them are skilled specifically in “international corporate law” (Nelson, 2006). Among the issues involved in worldwide business matters are laws connected to international conventions and treaties.
le of Goods 3.0 Contract of Carriage 3.1 The Hague Rules 3.2 The Hague-Visby Rules 3.3 The Hamburg Rules 3.4 Rotterdam Rules 4.0 Payment Issues 5.0 Conclusion 1.0 Introduction: Overview of Practical and Legal Issues in International Trading The advent of globalisation and free trade has resulted in the rapid burgeoning of international commercial trade, including the export and import of goods from one country to another.
Under international law, a jurisdiction in criminal matters can be either enforcement jurisdiction or prescribed, also known as prescriptive jurisdiction. Enforcement jurisdiction is the state’s power to apply national criminal law through its enforcement institutions such as the police or the executive via the courts (O’Keefe, 736-737).
"The Hague Convention,1970, and the Montreal Convention,1971 on hijacking have gone a long way to confer universal jurisdiction, to a great extent, on all states" (Bin Cheng R.H.F. Austin,"Air Law,in The Present State of International Law and other Essays"1973).
Different states and federal administrative bodies have jurisdictions over the conduct of private sector investigators, as well as private employers. According to Barbara (2001), Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) have the authority to review charges against employers and their agents of unfair discriminatory practices and labor practices.
The origins of the internet date back to as early as the 1960s. It's evolution changed the course of communication and computer technology spanning a diversity of people and cultures. The benefits that the Internet has accorded are so enormous and innovative that the generation today could not imagine the world without it.
The advent of globalisation and free trade has resulted in the rapid burgeoning of international commercial trade, including the export and import of goods from one country to another. In the United Kingdom, the nature of a sale transaction, as to whether