Many religious scholars and atheists alike have found the differential that exists between the god represented in the Old Testament and the god represented in the New Testament as tempting grounds for discussion. Atheists and agnostics have long lampooned the fact that the god…
, this paper will briefly discuss the representation of the god of the Old Testament through textual analysis and seek to answer which approach most adequately describes his nature.
One of the world’s most famous atheist Sir Richard Dawkins has this to say of the god represented in the Old Testament, “The god of the Old Testament is perhaps the most unpleasant character in all fiction. Jealous and proud of it, a petty unjust unforgiving control freak, a vindictive ethnic cleaners, a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, philicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully” (Dawkins 1). In this way, the reader can readily understand the approach that many who have rejected religion based upon the seemingly outlandish texts of the Old Testament hold to. From the atheist point of view or from the point of view of the believer that rejects the Old Testament, it is irreconcilable to believe in justice, equality, love, kindness, mercy, and yet believe that the same god that represents texts such as the following: “Then the Lord rained on Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven, and He overthrew those cities, and all the valley, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and what grew on the ground" (Gen. 19:24-25); or the following: “Behold, I [God], even I am bringing the flood of water upon the earth, to destroy all flesh in which is the breath of life, from under heaven; everything that is on the earth shall perish." (Gen. 6:17); or the following: "They [Israel] utterly destroyed everything in the city [Jericho], both man and woman, young and old, and ox and sheep and donkey, with the edge of the sword" (Joshua 6:21). Such dictates make the case extremely difficult for those that would seek to justify such an approach (Daniel 84).
In this way, seeking to justify the actions of the Israelites who were supposedly acting under the divine guidance of an omnipotent god becomes ...
Cite this document
(“Theology essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/572947-theology-essay
(Theology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Theology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/572947-theology-essay.
It is difficult to attach divinity or sacredness to church if we take the above definitions seriously. In my opinion, church is a building and a group of Christian people. But above all it is a place where the presence of God exists. “The church is the body of Christ, of which He is the head” (What is the Church).
While infant baptism is practiced by the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church, among others, it is actually denied by major Protestant denominations such as the Baptists, the Churches of Christ, Pentecostals and the Seventh Day Adventists, with the latter preferring adult baptism.
In light of the descriptions of Essenes by Josephus and Philo as described in the Damascus document, the Dead Sea document and the Rule of the community, someone might have been interested in being part of these separatist societies for a number of reasons.
The German theologian, Dietrich Bonhoeffer (1906 – 1945) wrote Life Together while teaching at an underground seminary. The book was first published in 1939 by the Christian Kaiser Verlag, in the German language. That Bonhoeffer had intended to entrench love and harmonious living, is a matter that is underscored by the book, since it was written against the backdrop of the Interwar period, a time when suspicion and hatred had soared to deplorable levels.
Three practical steps Christians can take to help the church to reflect Christ better within their community/culture are: to spend more quality time in prayer and Bible Study, to practice what they preach, and to avoid quarreling and backbiting among the members of the church.
One such translation is "what people pray, they believe" (Pepinster, 2004). The Classicists insist it should be "the law of belief is the law of prayer" (Toon 1992). Another is"so we believe, so we pray" (Ditchingham Report 1994). But personally for me, the most cogent translation is "the Church prays as the Church believes" (McNichol 2007).
Being such, this paper will be structured such that the first part will be a discussion of Freud’s claim ‘religion is an illusion’. The second part will be an elucidation of my position why I do not agree with the claim that ‘religion is an illusion. Finally the last
Three rival armies were struggling for power in Liberia although there were claims that the war was about the gap between the poor and the rich, ethnic differences, and the struggle for natural resources.