Multistate Regulation - Essay Example

Multi Regulation Multi Regulation Multi regulation involves restricting the access medical practitioners from different states have on other states. This means that, when a registered, medical practitioner from one state is in a different state, there are rules that determine if they do, or do not have the jurisdiction to practice in the state they are visiting. Over the years, these regulations have brought up heated arguments and debates as to why nurses, for example, may be prohibited from practicing their occupation because of their geographical setting.

The domain of the nursing practice is expanded on a daily basis through technology, and the new modalities in place that encourage the practice by nurses, wherever they are, or might go (Hann, 2007). This paper will examine the pros and cons of multistate regulation on the health care fraternity, and what it means to have rules in place to regulate the profession over state lines.Advantages of multistate regulation Once one is a licensed medical practitioner, it is their right to practice their profession in any state they want to practice.

This is one advantage brought on by the multistate regulation. If a medical practitioner is willing to conduct their business electronically, or physically, it is their right to do so, provided the licensing board in their state has approved of their practice (Hann, 2007). Also, if their practice is in agreement with the procedures and guidelines of the state in which they want to practice. Under mutual recognition, the multistate regulation ensures that medical practitioners may practice their profession across state lines (Hann, 2007).

This is if there are no restrictions. Another advantage of the multistate regulation is the creation of diverse experiences. The nursing profession essentially benefits from the enhancement of opportunities created through regulation. It is imperative that medical practitioners get the exposure from different areas so as to bring diversification to the table. This is possible through multistate regulation policies. Disadvantages of multistate regulation Health insurance companies are incurring tremendous losses as they tend to obey the different guidelines in the respective state (Milstead, 2013).

This is a different scenario present, because, if these insurance companies would comply with a single regulatory body, it would be easier to conduct business. They would incur fewer costs by getting compliance from a single body, than multiple regulatory standards, which each state requires. The costs incurred drive up a company’s expenses, which are unnecessary. If the insurance companies have reached the compliance agreements with the state they are licensed, they should not incur other costs in the starts they want to do business (Milstead, 2013).

Moreover, this coercive action on any field is dangerous. It leads to the emergence of illegal activities in the medical field. In many regions, some medical practices are prohibited. However, the presence of medical practitioners from different areas can provide the medical expertise to handle the prohibited situations, illegally. In light of the above, it is crucial for all bodies concerned with the regulation of many policies come up with strategies that ensure they are used to the benefit of the people.

There are risks involved in every policy that is implemented (Milstead, 2013). It is; therefore, right to say that, multistate regulation should be lessened to allow for the growth of the different fields/professions. It is up to these bodies to ensure that the presence of restrictions should not restrict the growth of professions, but ensure the fostering of understanding and trust between professional, intellectual heads. ReferencesHann, A. (2007). Health policy and politics. New York: Bantam Books.

Milstead, J. A. (2013). Health policy and politics: A nurses guide (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.