What the Community Says - Assignment Example

A Critique of “Health Promotion in Hospitals: A Strategy to Improve Quality in Health Care” by Groene, O. and Jorgensen, S, J. A Critique of “Health Promotion in Hospitals: A Strategy to Improve Quality in Health Care” by Groene, O. and Jorgensen, S, J.In a research critique according to Lee (2006), there should be a statement of the aims, methodology, appropriate research design, appropriate recruitment strategy, appropriate data collection and analysis methods, existence of consideration of ethical issues, clear statement of the findings and the importance of the research or the value of the research to the community (Lee, 2006).

There are various methods of critiquing qualitative research (Lee, 2006; Ryan, Coughlan & Cronin, 2007; Taylor & Kermode, 2006). There is no basis for selecting a specific type of framework and so this paper will use Lee’s framework.In the research paper, there is no clearly stated aim, but there is an explanation of public relevance of the strategy. The title of the research paper shows that health promotion is a strategy through which quality of health can be improved. It has a section that describes how health promotion is achieved.

This is through an international network. A database was formed to assess health promotion activities. This shows the method used to get data, but it has no clearly defined aim, data collection and data analysis method. The research paper has the following as findings: that the health promotion projects are strongly oriented to the staff and patients, but do not address underlying cultural and structural problems (Groene & Jorgensen, 2005).This research paper has no clearly stated aim, methodology, design, and data collection and analysis method.

It has however described the importance of the research findings to the community and the health care industry, and has described its findings. It is through the findings that the aim of the research can be obtained. The methodology, data collection and data analysis methods used can only be obtained by reading through specific topics within it. It should have described all these appropriately. The research topic shows that it is dealing with hospitals and not individuals requiring some ethical approval.

It has however, not stated this (Groene & Jorgensen, 2005).Reference Groene, O. and Jorgensen, S, J. (2005). Health Promotion in Hospitals: A Strategy to ImproveQuality in Health Care. European Journal of Public Health. 15 (1): 6-8. Retrieved on 28th February 2013 from:http://eurpub.oxfordjournals.org/content/15/1/6.full.pdf+htmlLee, P. (2006). Understanding And Critiquing Qualitative Research Papers. Nursing Times. 102(29): 30-32. Ryan, F., Coughlan, M. and Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-Step Guide to Critiquing Research.

Part 2:Qualitative Research. British Journal of Nursing. 16(12):738-744.Taylor, B. J. and Kermode, S. (2006). Research in Nursing and Health Care: Creating Evidencefor Practice. (3rd Ed). New South Wales: Cengage Learning Australia.