The installed monitoring gadget was more accurate with the operation of the nurse and if the case was to be taken from this instant then the conspicuous and repeated discrepancy between the two records were sufficient evidence to justify the actions of the facility. As the case proceeded to the trial levels, things were bound to change(Sloan, 1993). From the confession of other nurses that the facility did not have proper policy on documentation of narcotics and most of them had equally taken invalid records, gave the nurse upper hand to verify her claim. The discrepancy realized may have been as a result of mistakes made in undertaking the manual documentation for which the facility management seemed not give much attention. Testimony of the other nurses over uncensored manual documentation painted negligence on the side of the facility and therefore they lacked concrete incriminating evidence to suspend the nurse. This means that the testimony of the other nurses turned tables against the defense of the facility for suspending the nurse. The institution just realized that there had been a massive misinformation due to invalid records that must have been documented over time by most of the nurses (Sloan, 1993). The facility management therefore remained more exposed in its incompetency to make sound documentation policies which are the backbone of efficient operation of the facility and quality healthcare. The facility therefore had to address the issue of ineffective documentation policy that must have given the suspended nurse legal loophole to successfully sue it. Ruling of the case ought to have been in favor of the suspended nurse since her actions and the subsequent testimony exposed the long standing negligence of the institution as far as ethical and legal healthcare practices are concerned (Rosdahl & Kowalski,2008). The most important principle of safety to the patients in this case is to minimize error by following due instruction in terms of administering the right doze of the recommended prescription. The delay of documentation that the nurses testified to have been committing presents an open case of negligence since this is a matter of law and ethics which they must have been trained on. By the standard of their qualification, the patients are under their care in the spirit of trust and failure to take up their duties appropriately like documentation makes them liable to tort of negligence (Sloan, 1993). The confession about delay of the nurses’ documentation of such crucial information put the life of the patients at risk besides giving the institution wrong information that would be costly in terms of medication stocking and medical billing on patients. This therefore amounted to services below standard of care. The action of the nurses from this case presents poor ethical standards on the part of the nurses. It is imperative that the nurses know that communicating an existing problem that pose a threat to the facility and the health of the patients is primary to the welfare of the society (Rosdahl & Kowalski, 2008). The institution management should also underscore the significance of free and healthy interaction with its staff so that it would be easy for them to note any anomaly in their behavior. The interest of the patient should come first since the cardinal role of the nurses is to save life and this would suffice the definition of positive ethical code
LEGAL ASPECT OF NURSING Name Institution Nurses are currently under the lens of the law concerning their conduct when handling patients. They are equally treated as the agencies of the healthcare organizations and some of their actions are attributed to the organizational management practices (Rosdahl & Kowalski, 2008)…
Consequently, Mrs. M sued the hospital due to neglect by personnel. The paper reviews the legal aspects of the case with recommendations for appropriate policy changes in nursing care and amendments of the procedures manual. In addition, the disciplinary action of the nurse and untrained personnel is discussed.
When acceptable standards of operations are not adhered to, patients may suffer harm and catastrophe as a result of failure of health practitioners and organizations. In addition to medical experts’ duty to ensure safety of patients, the patients also have a moral obligation to safeguard their own well-being while undergoing treatment.
However, since ethics are often bent and individual molarity differs from person to person, it is the duty of any institution to put in place mechanisms aimed at taming such eventualities (Roussel, Swansburg, & Swansburg, 2006). This paper is going to evaluate a case in which a nurse has been suspended for abuse of office.
Patient safety is the most important part of healthcare practice, thus, medical practitioners are to do their best to protect patients against harm, which is a primary priority for every physician. Byers and White define patient safety as the freedom from events that may cause harm within the process of health provision (21).
Needless to say, offering proficient nursing care also engrosses employing knowledgeable ruling and decision making process. Knowledgeable decision making necessitates the nurse to utilize her dexterities and understanding, in addition to identifying when she requires extra support.
This particular scenario stretches from a legal aspect view, and a literal view of the incident. The main reason behind the existence of the two different firms is that the instance whereby Mr. Abraham succumbed to death, in one way or the other, the shift of blames suddenly arose.
First, the patient herself reported that she wanted to commit suicide. That is a principle to protect the safety of the patient even if it is made by the patients themselves. Second, the police leaves the patient; Judy, under hospital care since her life could be at risk with depression and stress if not helped by a psychiatrist, that is majorly why the police take them to the hospital where medical health could be found the third principle is that the patient is placed under psychiatrist check and a nurse is assigned to the patient for around the clock monitoring and check (NPSG, 2013).
This essay presents that patient safety in medical field is the greatest and paramount thing that practicing professionals as well as the legal frameworks strive earnestly to realize in the day-to-day operations.However, failure to observe patient safety results to lengthy stay in the hospital by patients, permanent injuries as well as even death.
Patient safety is at the center of the roles of medical practitioners and protecting patients against harm is a primary priority for every physician. Byers and Susan defines patient safety as the freedom from events that may result to harm from the