Physicists repute strongly that time cannot flow at all, whereas philosophers claim the passage of time is nonsensical. Philosophers’ argument questions the basis of Davies’ conception whereby they end up concluding his notion to be “founded on a misconception” since they deem science has already proven almost everything that comprises humanity’s settings, which includes dimension besides offering clear explanations. To prove his argument, Davies separates time into three sections, which include past, present and future . According to him, the only reality is the present, whereas past and future represent fixed points in the passage of time, which is an illusion. The aspect of time is a mystery whereby neither the scientists nor philosophers know really what it is or explain with clarity its existence. Therefore, they conclude time is a dimension whose phenomenon is different from other quantities but not identical to space. Thus, one can hardly determine its magnitude except marking it with events, which in this sense make both the past and future. In his quest to explain the notion of time, Davies relays how the present may change with one’s location. This is evident when a person has flown to the Mars leaving his or her counterparts here on the Earth, where they will be speculating his or her actions. Mostly, this varies with the exact reality on the Mars because their speculations may be either in the future or past based on what the rocket man is doing at that moment (Davies, 2002).
Therefore, this implies the only tool that can act as a measure of time is an event comprising an individual’s settings or life (Davies, 2002). This is because events or varied states characterizing humanity’s world eventually prove the passage of time mystery, which numerous scientists doubt, for instance, the physicists (Davies, 2002). Davies utilizes conventional wisdom in his experiment to expound the flow of time. He argues the present is the only reality, which the humanity has whereby the past slips away whereas the future comes into existence (Davies, 2002). Response I disagree with Paul Davies’ argument concerning time as a “mysterious flow”, which he asserts with a casual statement “passage of time” (Davies, 2002, p.40). This is because time is both a physical and basic experience that constitutes humanity’s existence; hence, it is hardly a mistaken identity (Davies, 2002). This is evident from diverse and numerous scientific breakthroughs or innovations which utilize dimension of time in their applications. Davies’ argument concerning time lacking definite distinctions to the extent of using events or past and future (to act as fixed points) is untrue (Davies, 2002). Since, this will imply a word like duration will have no meaning especially in the measurement of how long something has taken place or persisted. Davies’ argument, which states time can fly or flow, is untrue and inconsistent (Davies, 2002). This is because the concept of movement (flow or fly), which Davies attributes to time usually, applies to physical entities whereby their positions change with time. Therefore, presenting his argument of time in