Concurrent Human Problems Are Spiral - Book Report/Review Example

Concurrent Human Problems are Spiral al Affiliation Introduction Concurrent human problems are caused by weak planning structures. Like animals, the survival of humans has always been competitive. Human will compete on any given threshold provided it brings an extrinsic satisfaction in their lives. Justifiably, human beings utilize resources and maximize resources to increase the overall production. The incoming research is projected on two books. The books include. The Accordion Family:Boomerang Kids, Anxious Parents (2012) by Katherine S. Newman, and A Precariat Charter; From Denizens to Citizens (2014) by Guy standing. The review will analyze each book independently. Having explained, the book will compare the two books proactively, and proceed in giving an evaluation of the two books. The study will prove that the zeal for human competition and desire for security does not have a limit. Background Katherine S Newman is an academician of sociology at the Krieger School of Arts and Sciences at Job Hopkins University. Newman has authored and co-authored over ten books on urban poverty, global problems, middle-class economic instability, and inequality. Newman has as well, taught at the University of California located in Columbia. Some of her books include After Freedom: The Rise of the Post-Apartheid Generation in Democratic South Africa. Boston: Beacon Press where she co-authored with Ariane DeLannoy. In the year 2012, she wrote The Accordion Family: Boomerang Kids, Anxious Parents and the Private Toll of Global Competition Beacon. In the year 2011, she wrote Taxing the Poor: Doing Damage to the Truly Disadvantaged University of California Press. As well, in the year 2007, she wrote The Missing Class: Portraits of the Near Poor in America. Boston: Beacon Press. Concisely, Newman has been a seasonal writer focusing her efforts on books that affect American public life. The purpose of this research is to investigate The Accordion Family. On the other hand, Guy Standing is a British Professor of Development Studies at the School of Oriental and African Studies. Standing has written extensively on the unemployment, labor market policy, labor economics and labor market flexibility. Standing has authored, Global labor flexibility and seeking distributive Justice (1999). He has also authored promoting income security as the right Europe and North America (2005). Standing has also authored journals Social Income and Insecurity, a Study in Gujarat. As well, Guy has authored influential journals, for instance, Britain Labor figures hide the real hours we work every day (2012). Indeed, Standing has been involved in authoring mostly labor related political books and journals. Book Classes Although the book is more journalistic, it presents arguments that are explicitly political. Newman analyzes complex American issues in a critic way. By introducing the Boomerang Children topic, Newman reports and later extends her discussion to the political arena. In her book, Newman explains that the current situation in American economic life is hurting the social foundation of the country. Accordingly, parents are increasingly replacing monthly or weekly allowances with need-based money handouts, which has resulted in a want it now generation. Justifiably, Newman presents sophisticated justifications by delaying departure from the family home. In addition, Newman presents journalistic findings from the research. For example, after interviewing college students, it is clear that 85 percent will return to live their parents after they graduate. On the other hand, Standing investigates the political impact on labor. It is clear that in the 21st century there have been a number of the structural changes in energy. The author later reports that changes in the labor market often constrain the proper productivity of labor. As such, the real value of labor is not accomplished. Thus, the reports, findings, and arguments classify the book as explicitly political. Overview of the Books Accordion Justifiably, the book does not contain several chapters that cannot be accounted for. The parts of in the book are defragmented into different sections. These are the chapters, Chapter 1, The Slippery State of Adulthood, Chapter 2, why are Accordion Families Spreading. Chapters 3, In-House Adulthood, Chapter 4, I’m Ok, You Are Not, Chapter 5, When the Nest Doesn’t Empty, Chapter 6, Trouble In Paradise, Chapter 7, The Birth Dearth and the Immigrant Menace. On the other hand, A Precariat Chart has the following topics, Denizens and the precariat, The austerity era, The Precariat grows, The confronting the utilitarian consensus, and Towards a Precariat Charter. Topics in Newman text prove that through a major correlation pursuit for a better future and putting unnecessary pressure on resources. The connection is complex since it does not necessarily tell us whether resources are changing hands. The current problem in advanced societies is that older generations are not preparing younger generations to become industrious. As well, Standing investigates the changes in labor markets, education, and housing that seem to institutionalize young generations unconditionally. From the justification, it is clear that national economies reflect historical patterns primarily that built over centuries of institutionalization. However, from the topics of the two books, it is clear that institutionalization is not taken the needed cause. In fact, much has ended up being ignored in the process. Summaries Both books terminate with a political summary on the nature of global institutionalism. From that point, it is clear that bureaucratic tendencies have limited American societies limiting the needed course for change. In both books, my starting points looks at the changes in labor market, before advancing on social issues such as housing or family units. Like, Britain America is still one of the largest manufacturers, downward changes in production have increased unemployment rates (Koyasaki, 2004). Like Britain, America is facing significant challenges when the issue of labor is considered. In fact, America is not in a position to provide the essential labor. Multiple laws are failing significantly. As well, the fragile state of the economy, one that is being affected by global downturns, for example the 2009 economic recession proves that the labor market is in a much bigger catastrophe. Context The Slippery State of Adulthood Newman is categorical on the challenges that American youth face while attempting to launch in life. In her evaluation, Newman argues that cultural devaluation has led to the declining optimism. In other words, Generation Y lacks the appropriate ingredients required to compete favorably in life. On one hand, parents are still not contended that the youth can be able to be independent. The youth considers that they do have the appropriate techniques to survive in a competitive and demanding American society. However, Newman is contextual that citizens have to face an adult life. With a demanding economic life, most Adults are unable to the proper parent. On the other hand, dealing with youth who have an abrupt character requires delicate care. According to Newman, American families fail to a suitable family since teenagers feel abandoned by their parents. For example, Teddy Yoo believes that his parent fail to strike the balance by differentiating Yoo current life and post-college life. Why are Accordion Families Spreading? Newman is compelled that the current situation in America is encouraging the presence of more accordion family structure. Newman argues that, accordion families are hardly new. She further quotes life social-security system, which created opportunities for retirements and elderly relatives. However, currently accordion families are spreading since parents think that do not have to battle teenage type challenges. As such, the youth makes the right decision. On another hand, the dwindling opportunities have continued encouraging the presence of Accordion type of families. In fact, supported by Reed (2008, p. 44), Newman argues that it has become a common trend that where parents and their teenagers are pulling back resources into the same port. In-House Adulthood Newman believes that living at the home at the age of thirty is different from being a teenager or youth. The problem is that not many young adults easily become beloved roommate, but parents still want to maintain the supervisory role. However, more challenges arise especially if their family worries. With coercive attempts by parents to confiscate the adult’s income, Newman believes that this could result new problems. The problem graduates when the young adult begins to foot most of the bills. Automatically, the adult believes that he or she should be making critical decisions. However, parents do not relinquish that power easily. As well, there are several classes, for instance, clashes over music, length of men’s hair and cloth type of both sexes, social or political mores. The parent feels that he needs to make critical decisions as well. I’m Ok, You Are Not, In this chapter, Newman presents an in-depth possible relationship between members of an accordion family. Newman quotes the Japanese family where a young girl was making her mother drink poison, and she was keeping her a diary of observations. The girl wanted her mother to die so that she can inherit the house. However, unlike the Japanese society, the American society is different in how generations relate to each other. The society believes as long as an individual seems to be making the appropriate approach in his career, then living up to thirties at home is appropriate. However, in both societies, transformation becomes a serious problem eventually. The young adult is technically incapacitated while he or she attempts to create a meaningful life. When the Nest does not empty, Newman presents this chapter in order to present the nature of changing labor force in American. She believes that more old age individuals are going back to the labor force in order to expand their earnings. However, the need to go back to earning is not propelled by the desire for a better life, certainly is the need to satisfy the growing financial needs at home. Interestingly, Newman presents a justification why such a development is possible. She argues that unlike the Generation silent, the Baby Boomers are never tired enough of parenting; the reason is that they feel they have not done enough of such. Unlike the Generation Silent, women of the Baby Boomers age put more resources into their careers. This proves that structure of American society has changed significantly over time. In fact, American baby boomer father has also taken up the parenting role heavily. Hence, families have stopped being what they commonly are. As such, families have turned out to be more of schemes of aiding each other. Trouble in Paradise Newman presents this chapter in an attempt to justify that the current trend of adult children creates a troubling future. Of course, the home has become a paradise where both mum; dad and child are combining resources towards achieving a better life. However, there is a problem if the adult child is not taking his life forward. Joined by Piorkowski (2008, p. 74), one would conclude that there may lack a generation another if the current state does not change. As bills increase, the adult-child focus will be to minimize these bills. For that reason, he or she forgets about the need to establish her own family. The Birth Dearth and the Immigrant Menace Newman pours her efforts to establish what she believes as a stay-at-home motherhood of the past and become a more ferocious debate in the popular press and the frontlines. In this chapter, there are critical reflections of a perfect American society, where idealism takes center stage. For instance, a stay at home mother will naturally push the next generation forward as a parent and not necessary as an ally. On the other hand, Denizens and the precariat A common term that Standing has been pursuing is the Precariat. In his language, the precariat is a ruthless society of sharks. The society is caused by the need for more materials, where individuals are more concerned in their success. In this chapter, Standing attempts to justify that man has become what he is today because of subsequent insecurities in life. The austerity era Standing investigates the austerity era, where the influence of politics on resources drastically increases unemployment. Hence, the reduced budgetary allocation means these countries will have more resourcse to allocate on important factors such as wage deficits. Austerity is taken to demonstrate the government commitment to the creditors and credit rating agencies. However, the austerity era comprises of conservative individuals. Standing as well investigates the economic thoughts of people born in the Austeric era. The Precariat grows In this chapter, Standing investigates how the Precariat grows. Indeed, Precariat simply stands for competition. Human beings compete in a variety of ways, which includes renting their bodies. As people, advance towards Precariat prosperity the more they need to safeguard what they have already got. By comparison with their own past, previous generations of men, and the expectations and aspiration instilled in them by their families and cultures. As the precariat advances career jobs evaporate, loss of face compounds the loss of income and the status trapping that go with it. Standing further argues as the generating precarious labor, men attuned to a self-image of stability and career progression are endangered of being traumatized. The confronting the utilitarian consensus, In this chapter, standing analyzes two key traditions of investigating the social policy. This includes traditions of thinking about social policy, commonly known as utilitarianism theory. According to standing, in the globalization era, utilitarianism triumphs, bearers’ standards in the progressive tradition, which are mostly deserted to the neo-liberals and leaving a vacuum. Reflectively, standing argues that man right or wrong actions are justified with how one think of good or bad actions. Towards a Precariat Charter. Standing provides a critical assessment of the future of Precariat era. He proves that the era might go untracked if the current social-political foundations do not change. As well, Standing believes that changing philosophical radicalism will lead to the rise of gangs, for example, the Chartist movement, which is comprised of male artisan and crafts. For that reason, conflicting group will be required to make charters to ensure that goals on resource management are achieved. Comparison The two books relate to each other deeply. Although Newman books are based on simpler stories and more social reflections, there are similarities with Standing texts. However, Newman projects ideas on a social perspective to reflect on the nature economic situation of the current. Convincingly, Standing text is more of an extension of Newman findings. The globalization agenda that Standing communicates about is similar to the adult-child crises in Newman texts. Reflectively, both texts are under the view that humankind is trapped in a Rat Race. In order to survive, humankind needs to worker harder and minimize personal budgets. As well, the two texts believe that Governments have abandoned humanity. In fact, the two texts envision a situation where there is no geopolitical control of resources. This way, humankind is not aware of what he really wants. The two texts affirm that humankind is more interested in personal prosperity and not the prosperity of a nation as a whole. This explains multiple competitions as well which are not uncontrolled. Likewise, the two texts present concerns of the marginalized group, the youth. Reflectively, the youth are in a competition since they do not have solution to their current problem. As well, the youth are in a competition since they have lost for prosperity.. However, how each author treats the youth subject differently. For example, Newman thinks about the youth as a marginalized group, which is limited in multiple interests. Nonetheless, the two texts believe that the enabled youth who have closed to the other sphere of development certainly join the Rat race Evaluation The two books have strengths and weaknesses. Both authors present factual and theoretical information to justify diverse factors. Although the style of each author differs from the other author, there are significant rhetorical factors that both authors have developed with time. The language and syntax of the Newman are more reflective while that of Standing is more integrative. As well, both author’s arguments are convincing. Newman presents her ideas through narration backed by stories. On the other hand, Standing presents his ideas through a critical analysis of concurrent global issues. Somewhat, both approaches reflect on what is happening globally. As well, both texts present numerical learning, knowledge and qualities. The difference between the two books is that they are reviewed and structured by the knowledge gained from the book. Conclusion As noted, the books present critical insights on concurrent human developments. After a close analysis, one will notice that the books act as a revelation to future generations. As well, the books reflect on the situation, in order to help the audience generate solutions on subsequent human problems. Reflectively, the books seek to exemplify that ongoing human challenges are caused by human-to-human ruthlessness. By doing so, the books help to identify the ongoing challenges are caused by the need for a secure feature. In light with that, I would like to advocate a book by Muhamad Yunus book, Social Business. The book communicates the different perspective of approaching competition and most precisely, capitalism. References Katherine S. N., (2012), The Accordion Family:Boomerang Kids, Anxious Parents, and the Private Toll of Global Competition. Beacon Press Guy S, (2014). A Precariat Charter. From Denizens to Citizens Yunus, M., & Weber, K. (2010). Building social business: The new kind of capitalism that serves humanitys most pressing needs. New York: Public Affairs. Kiyosaki, R., & Lechter, S. (2004). Rich dad, poor dad for teens: The secrets about money - that you dont learn in school! New York: Warner Books. Piorkowski, G. (2008). Adult children of divorce: Confused love seekers. Westport, Conn.: Praeger. Reed, A. (2008). The Hemingses of Monticello: An American family. New York: W.W. Norton &. Read More