The Problem of School Bullying of Cancer Patients - Coursework Example

Counselling Student’s Name: Institution: Introduction This essay will examine the issue of school bullying, which are a widespread current issue affecting young people, especially those with cancer. The article will give a description and application of two different therapeutic approaches that would be suitable for the issue. In terms of interventions, the paper will make a comparison of different approaches, stating the role of client/ young person and the probable outcomes. Bullying of cancer patients Cancer has posed not only negative effects on the children's education but also their welfare and health. Leading United Kingdom’s cancer charity for children report indicates that lots of kids feel isolated when they return to school after cancer treatment. According to research, kids with cancer are being bullied by their colleagues, lose friends and risk falling back at school. Out of three parents, one parent argued that their kid had been teased, or bullied due to the effects of cancer treatment as gaining weight because of steroids, or losing hair. In UK, each year, approximately 1, 500 kids are diagnosed with cancer (Children with cancer 'bullied by classmates', 2015). The CLIC Sargent cancer charity report indicates that the illness can considerably disrupt the education of the child as well as their capability to keep and make friends. The research established that young people with the disease had been bullied by their generation since they gain weight (one of them was even being told that he was going to lose his life) or lost their hair. A survey done on children with cancer and their parents was the basis of this report, and it looked at the effects of the disease on the primary education of the children. For instance, a parent said that the classmates of his son tried to steal his hat that he uses to cover his head due to bald-headedness caused by the disease. In another case, a parent said that her daughter was teased since she had gained weight and lost hair (Children with cancer 'bullied by classmates', 2015). One parent of victim of bullying, James, said that her son used to have friends at school; however, his close friends began to be so nasty and cruel to him when he came back following his main cancer treatment. She said that in some situations, older children laughed at him and told him; he was going to die. The aim of publishing this report was to mark the Childhood Cancer Awareness Month. The report establishes that forty-seven percent of the parents said that their kid had grown apart from their acquaintances. A comparable proportion said the school of their child did not assist to keep contact with friends and classmates even as their daughter or son was off. Approximately thirteen per cent said their child felt excluded and isolated (Children with cancer 'bullied by classmates', 2015). The research also discloses concerns about the children’s level of education as they receive treatment. Only 36 percent (about a third) said that the elementary school of their youngster stayed in touch with the doctor's facility school. The report noted setbacks in returning home mentors, and that a few gatherings work additional difficult to store home educational cost. The head of CLIC Sargent, Lorraine Clifton, said that no child ought to forego on their instruction because they have had growth, and it is annoying that some are tormented, or even singled out. He encouraged the nearby powers and the administration to verify kids with disease do not miss the home educational cost they require. Therapeutic Assessment (TA) Therapeautic Assessment (TA) is a clinical system that transparently utilizes mental evaluation with a kid as the premise for family inclusion. Grown by Finn and his partners, TA is a semi-organized sort of individualized or synergistic appraisal. TA is extraordinarily connected with Fischer's work and others, every one of whom develop their models of community-oriented appraisal independently yet hence affected and were controlled by TA. TA likewise endures the solid similarity to Dynamic Assessment in which customized intercessions are fused into psycho-instructive appraisals to make conceivable approaches to address and the reasons for an individual is learning troubles. On the other hand, TA can be utilized with all types of mental appraisals including identity, neuropsychological, learning, and psychological. A uniting trademark crosswise over cases has been the joining of discoveries inside of the present life and history setting of the family, prearranged by inquiries asked by the tyke and the folks toward the begin of the appraisal. The standards of TA are established in interpersonal, phenomenological, and between subjective speculations of human conduct like different sorts of communitarian evaluation. Derivation and translation involve a combination of idiographic and nomothetic routines. Information are deciphered out of sight of the relationship of the customer with the assessor and the explanation behind the appraisal. Late studies show that positive medicines of TA with grown-ups. These incorporate more noteworthy confidence and self-regard and diminished symptomatology. It further makes that customers who were grown-ups were likely to finish recommended treatment and felt a more grounded coalition with their assessor than clients who got a conventional mental appraisal. In 2004, Hilsenroth et al. fake this discovering, and exhibited that the positive advantages reached out to the union clients created with their specialists in taking after treatment. In addition, there are presently various distributed contextual analyses exhibiting the clinical productivity of TA (Tharinger et al. 2007). Investigations on collaborative assessments are with adolescents or children have enabled parents to understand the problems of their children. Parents have also been able to feel more efficient in pursuing suitable services and carrying their roles as parents. Kids have revealed declined behavioural problems and enhanced mood, school adjustment, and social functioning. TA with preadolescent children is imagined mostly as brief family frameworks mediation. Its principle objective is to help folks fathom and turn out to be more empathic to their children and to direct those grown-ups in changing their associations with children in ways that will advance proceeding with advancement in the child and family and winning adjustment. The systems for TA are likely to be suitable for requesting, multi-issue circumstances, with children who are especially difficult to comprehend or families whose mental challenges or own projections make them not able to see precisely and respond suitably to their kids. TA with teenagers or children distinctively involves 8 to 10 sessions that occur over a two to three-month period (Tharinger et al. 2007). Techniques and instruments utilized incorporate psychopathology measures and self-report identity; conduct-rating scales finished by instructors and folks; institutionalized neuropsychological and psycho-instructive measures; perceptions of the family, folks, and tyke; meetings to acquire family and formative history and to develop appraisal inquiries; and family sessions. Others incorporate assessor counter transference responses to the family, folks, and kid; unstructured and organized play; imaginative and stretched out request to test reactions. Particular strategies and measures are picked in view of the appraisal issues that are being tended to. School staff may be included in the input and evaluation if a youngster's issues happen in that setting are brought up in the appraisal issues of the folks, and the folks give their consent. In TA, the procedure of inviting the parent to attend the sessions may breach privacy and professional ethics thus compromising security. Although, parents watch the testing materials without them taking the tests themselves (Tharinger et al. 2007). Residential Treatment In spite of the exponential augment in the number of adolescents and children reliant on intensive treatment services, there is a number of disapproval of residential treatment. One of the commonly cited problems is that achievements made in treatment fall short to simplify after discharge, with several youth engaging in problematic behaviors upon arrival to their communities and homes (Nickerson et al. 2006). Escalating the involvement of parents in residential treatment, may assist facilitate the transition of children at home and sustain treatment gains because of bullying. There is very empirical evidence to recommend that family participation for children in residential treatment contribute to outcomes that are more successful. Concentrated family-based residential programs attain better post-discharge steadiness than traditional programs. Combined parent involvement and parent education programs result in an augmented probability of family reunification compared to parent involvement or parent education programs only. Additionally, children discharged into supportive and stable environments have better outcomes. Little has been done by residential agencies to encourage parent involvement historically. The most common type of contact in this intervention is phone calls (Nickerson et al. 2006). The accompanying are points of interest of family inclusion in private treatment; positive effect on treatment, and expanded feeling of having a place. The disadvantages are clashes between staff and parents, modelling of deviant behaviour by families, changeable behaviour of family members that may let down the child. Additionally, most staff members in the study thought that reunification of the family should be the objective for less than half of their child clients while only 22% thought it should be the aim for nearly all clients. Moreover, research has revealed that professionals tendency to attribute the problems of children to the parents that may affect the likelihood of workers in sustaining family involvement in treatment. The similarities of the two treatment interventions are as follows. Both treatment approaches involve parents in their processes. Both intervention approaches have allowed parents understand their children well. The circumstance of children being bullied is still on the rise but with these two methods of treating such trauma caused by bullying because of cancer, young people have been able to handle their assignments at home. Others have managed to go back to school. The differences in the two treatment approaches are as follows. Therapeutic assessment is more effective in adults whereas residential treatment is more effective is children. In residential treatment, there are clashes between staff and parents unlike in the therapeutic assessment. Children are significant for the success of the two processes since they are the victims of bullying. A cooperative child during assessment implies that a quick solution to the problem will be obtained. For example in helpful evaluation, the child may be seen at school, coaches may be talked with and asked for to finish measures of behavioral working, and instructors may be offered with reaction toward the end of the TA. In the event that folks have assessment addresses that include the way their identity or conduct may influence their kid, they are welcome to get and take response on any of different mental tests (Tharinger et al. 2007). This response distinctively concentrates on courses parts of the child rearing style and the identity of the folks may be adding to their difficulties with their kid. Despite the fact that this practice is less plausible to be consolidated in school-based TA, there may be different approaches to support folks fathom their commitments to the battles of their youngsters. A disputable and extraordinary highlight of TA with youngsters that potentially reinforces its intercession potential involves requesting that folks watch all or a portion of the testing sessions of their kids. As expressed beforehand, captivating the folks is in the soul of joint experimentation as prepared in psychological behavioral treatment. In therapeutic practice, folks regularly sit toward the edge of the workplace to watch and afterward discuss their responses and perceptions with the evaluator after the session (Tharinger et al. 2007). Further, folks with the consciousness of their tyke watch their kid's sessions at the back a restricted mirror escorted by an individual from the TA, which is accessible to collaborate with the folks all through their perceptions. Ordinarily, both individuals from the AT and the folks meet to discuss the session toward the end. The majority of the kids utilize the opportunity introduced to them by the treatment ways to deal with impart to their guardians through a few routines and tests. In addition, several of the folks in TAP have demonstrated that the reconnaissance piece was a standout amongst the focal angles in propelling another impression of their tyke. In any case, there are conceivable kids who will not feel safe or be all right with this setup. In this circumstance, it might be that TA is not indicated or that the assessor will need to work all the more effectively with the folks outside the observational connection (Tharinger et al. 2007). Conclusion In conclusion, the paper has stated some of the reasons why their classmates in school bully children with cancer. We have observed that effects of cancer disease, their treatment and interventions have resulted to such menace. The article has also discussed two treatment interventions with their applications regarding bullying. These treatment interventions include therapeutic assessment and residential treatment. Therefore, we can observe that bullying has great negative effect to those involved, and if not prevented immediately, it will lead to derailment of education of the child involved. Further, it will lead to trauma thus leading to emotional instability and loss of self-esteem of the victim. References Children with cancer 'bullied by classmates' (n.d.). Retrieved May 8, 2015, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/9720747/Children-with-cancer-bullied-by-classmates.html Horsley, H., & Patterson, T. (n.d.). The Effects of a Parent Guidance Intervention on Communication among Adolescents Who Have Experienced the Sudden Death of a Sibling. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 119-137. Liao, L., Missenden, K., Hallam, R., & Conway, G. (2005). Experience of early pubertal development: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 219-233. Madsen, W. (n.d.). Collaborative Helping: A Practice Framework for Family-Centered Services. Family Process, 103-116. Moreland, A., & Dumas, J. (n.d.). Evaluating Child Coping Competence: Theory and Measurement. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 437-454. Nickerson, A., Brooks, J., Colby, S., Rickert, J., & Salamone, F. (2006). Family Involvement in Residential Treatment: Staff, Parent, and Adolescent Perspectives. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 681-694. Ontai, L., & Thompson, R. (n.d.). Attachment, Parent-Child Discourse and Theory-of-Mind Development. Social Development, 47-60. Orsmond, G., & Seltzer, M. (n.d.). Siblings Of Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorders Across The Life Course. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 313-320. Spiller, V. (n.d.). The White Whale: A Case Study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 185-192. Tharinger, D., Finn, S., Wilkinson, A., & Schaber, P. (2007). Therapeutic assessment with a child as a family intervention: A clinical and research case study. Psychology in the Schools, 293-309. Read More

The report noted setbacks in returning home mentors, and that a few gatherings work additional difficult to store home educational cost. The head of CLIC Sargent, Lorraine Clifton, said that no child ought to forego on their instruction because they have had growth, and it is annoying that some are tormented, or even singled out. He encouraged the nearby powers and the administration to verify kids with disease do not miss the home educational cost they require. Therapeutic Assessment (TA) Therapeautic Assessment (TA) is a clinical system that transparently utilizes mental evaluation with a kid as the premise for family inclusion.

Grown by Finn and his partners, TA is a semi-organized sort of individualized or synergistic appraisal. TA is extraordinarily connected with Fischer's work and others, every one of whom develop their models of community-oriented appraisal independently yet hence affected and were controlled by TA. TA likewise endures the solid similarity to Dynamic Assessment in which customized intercessions are fused into psycho-instructive appraisals to make conceivable approaches to address and the reasons for an individual is learning troubles.

On the other hand, TA can be utilized with all types of mental appraisals including identity, neuropsychological, learning, and psychological. A uniting trademark crosswise over cases has been the joining of discoveries inside of the present life and history setting of the family, prearranged by inquiries asked by the tyke and the folks toward the begin of the appraisal. The standards of TA are established in interpersonal, phenomenological, and between subjective speculations of human conduct like different sorts of communitarian evaluation.

Derivation and translation involve a combination of idiographic and nomothetic routines. Information are deciphered out of sight of the relationship of the customer with the assessor and the explanation behind the appraisal. Late studies show that positive medicines of TA with grown-ups. These incorporate more noteworthy confidence and self-regard and diminished symptomatology. It further makes that customers who were grown-ups were likely to finish recommended treatment and felt a more grounded coalition with their assessor than clients who got a conventional mental appraisal.

In 2004, Hilsenroth et al. fake this discovering, and exhibited that the positive advantages reached out to the union clients created with their specialists in taking after treatment. In addition, there are presently various distributed contextual analyses exhibiting the clinical productivity of TA (Tharinger et al. 2007). Investigations on collaborative assessments are with adolescents or children have enabled parents to understand the problems of their children. Parents have also been able to feel more efficient in pursuing suitable services and carrying their roles as parents.

Kids have revealed declined behavioural problems and enhanced mood, school adjustment, and social functioning. TA with preadolescent children is imagined mostly as brief family frameworks mediation. Its principle objective is to help folks fathom and turn out to be more empathic to their children and to direct those grown-ups in changing their associations with children in ways that will advance proceeding with advancement in the child and family and winning adjustment. The systems for TA are likely to be suitable for requesting, multi-issue circumstances, with children who are especially difficult to comprehend or families whose mental challenges or own projections make them not able to see precisely and respond suitably to their kids.

TA with teenagers or children distinctively involves 8 to 10 sessions that occur over a two to three-month period (Tharinger et al. 2007). Techniques and instruments utilized incorporate psychopathology measures and self-report identity; conduct-rating scales finished by instructors and folks; institutionalized neuropsychological and psycho-instructive measures; perceptions of the family, folks, and tyke; meetings to acquire family and formative history and to develop appraisal inquiries; and family sessions.

Read More