The process of coming out with an apt definition of social identity is much tougher than the one involved in specifying the aforesaid identities, based on biology and physiology. The reason for this is, it is a highly intricate mental process of an individual that makes them develop a specific social identity – it is a process starting from as early as the childhood. Here, many external social factors and influences also do come into play. To elaborate more, the identity that a person develops as belonging to a particular culture or religion and gender is attributable to exposure to the concerned influences, almost right from the time of birth. On the other hand, identities like those that speak of political affiliations, feeling of being a part of some organization, etc, are developed in the later stages of life. Generally, the identity obtained during the younger days, primarily due to family influence, is retained by an individual throughout their lifetime. Here, it needs to be added that, various experiences an individual faces in life, both pleasant and also otherwise, could make them adopt new identities.Now, the focus would shift to the vital aspect of the manner in which social science researchers are necessitated to design the questions pertaining to their study, based on the identity of the group or people to be interviewed. Though the topic of research could be the same, yet, it is of paramount relevance that the questions and also the pattern in which they are asked need to be modified.
Cite this document
(“Social Science Research Issue of Identity Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/social-science/405411-researching-social-life-sociology-criminolgy
(Social Science Research Issue of Identity Essay)
“Social Science Research Issue of Identity Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/social-science/405411-researching-social-life-sociology-criminolgy.
Cited: 0 times
This paper attempts to study the concept of “Identity” from the perspective of social science. It would emphasize on various intricacies involved in appropriately comprehending the identity of different groups, as well as the resultant challenges being faced by the researchers…
On the other hand, qualitative designs concentrate in understanding social phenomena by use of direct observation, analysis of secondary data and direct integration with the participants. Social scientists in general, apply various methods to investigate broad social phenomena.
Research is undertaken within most professions. More than a set of skills, research is a way of thinking. It is something like understanding and formulating guiding principles that govern a particular procedure as well as developing and testing new theories that for the enhancement of any practice.
The major reason of the shift in methodology of social science is application of critical theory. Critical theory must be distinguished from a traditional approach according to the practical purpose of this theory: it is critical to the extent that it involves human emancipation in order to provide freedom to humanity from "the circumstances that enslave them".3 According to the scholars that support this view, social inquiry must combine but not separate the two poles of philosophy and social science, normative and positive, explanation and understanding.
In any research we can have valid and reliable results, reliable but invalid results, valid and non reliable results and finally invalid and unreliable results.
Reliability means that the results of a study are of quality in measuring relationships between variables, when measures are reliable it means that if another study was undertaken the same results will be obtained, this means that the measure of the study is consistent and repeatable if other studies of the same type are undertaken.There are various reliability measures which include observer reliability, test reliability, parallel reliability and consistent reliability:
The chief attraction of a comparative methodology is found in the fact that it allows its user to replicate and approximate the controlled conditions of laboratory experiments that are normally deployed and used in the natural and medical sciences. However comparative methodology has several limitations when deployed in understanding the social science phenomena.
Their focus is on the way people interact with one another and the way they organize and co-operate in order to accomplish different tasks or objectives. Gordon considers this view insufficient, as it doesn't make reference to actions that are characteristic to human interaction, meaning actions like crime and war, or dysfunctional behavior as well as what he calls mal-functional phenomena- pollution or unemployment.
Their focus is on the way people interact with one another and the way they organize and co-operate in order to accomplish different tasks or objectives. Gordon considers this view insufficient, as it doesn’t make