By the start of 1970s, currents of change were detected in the global economic order, with nationalism and protectionism being replaced by neo-liberalism and free flow of capital. Even as American elites promoted this new economic order, the process was facilitated by respective participant elites from nations across the world. The irony lies in the fact that communist China was at the forefront of the global neo-liberal program, despite claiming its socialist credentials. If the ideological gates of the authoritarian and highly protectionist China could be broken open for free-market capitalism, then it was only a matter of time and strategy before other power bastions of the world are broken through. And this is precisely what had happened. With the collapse of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s and the shift in policy framework of several developing countries, the nature and complexion of geo-economics has taken a different form. Needless to say, Americas position as the sole superpower has been strengthened by this change. The unsavory aspects of this sweeping change include “the appearance of a nearly feral form of entrepreneurship in which black marketers, drug barons, arms merchants, rackets bosses, Mafiosi, and other profiteers are emerging as the economic and political leaders of the social transformations underway in their respective societies.” (Buchanan, 2000, p.1) Before embarking on answering the essay question, understanding what neo-liberal globalization truly entails.
Cite this document
(“American hegemony in the global economic system Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/social-science/428378-do-we-need-american-hegemony-in-the-global-economic-system-to-build-and-maintain-the-liberal-global-capitalist-economic-order
(American Hegemony in the Global Economic System Essay)
“American Hegemony in the Global Economic System Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/social-science/428378-do-we-need-american-hegemony-in-the-global-economic-system-to-build-and-maintain-the-liberal-global-capitalist-economic-order.
Cited: 0 times
The paper “American hegemony in the global economic system” seeks to evaluate America's position as the sole superpower. The author analyzes the mode and manner in which this grand transformation in global economics was brought about. …
This paper attempts to answer the question whether liberalism is simply another tool to maintain western hegemony. Liberalism is one of the most dominant theories in international politics and emphasizes on equality and freedom and most importantly the rights inherent in individuals as human beings such as right to life, liberty, and property.
This paper focuses on the essence of cultural hegemony and its impact on different elementary schools in America. Initially, the paper provides a short glimpse of cultural hegemony and its impact. Subsequently, it dwells on the varied nature in of hegemony elementary schools across America.
Instead of simple declinist prophesies, Zakaria expounds the picture of the future world where the relative decrease in the U.S. economic, political and cultural influence would still be tempered by the retained potential of the U.S. and the lack of singular powerful contenders to the American international status.
According to Bryane (5), globalisation refers to the international expansion of the world economy through foreign influences such as economic, social, political, and related information, across borders. However, the stability of the international economy requires the dominance of one nation over others.
Hegemony is a critical issue when trying to explain political economy. This is because hegemony represents a post-war issue. Most economists understand it as an issue explainable in terms of international relationship. Hegemony to economists can be simply defined as a form of dominance.
Central to the discussion in this field is the concept called hegemony and polarity.
In this paper, I will be exploring the concept of hegemony and unipolarity with the goal of determining how the lone superpower, the United States, is to be regarded. The discussion would involve the thoughts of many scholars but I would be making more use of four rather prominent scholars namely William Thompson, David Wilkinson, George Modelski and Donald Puchala.
"Radicals are concerned most with explaining the relationship between production, social relations and power" (Mingst, 2005, p.72). The neo-Gramscian perspective is a current of Marxist theories in international relations but retains a distinct identity among them since it significantly differs from other Marxist perspectives on questions of the sources of power, the role ideology and culture, the significance of consensus and the nature of hegemony.
The author identifies the new world order and the system of New Imperialism with the USA and its global power. He associates previous and current policies of the state with racism and hegemony. He criticizes military policy of the government and underlines the important role of self-determination of other states.
configuration between dominant ideas, institutions and material capacities that are widely accepted as.1 The manner by which states, groups and players navigate the intricacies of the global order is seen to lead to global hegemonies as a way to ensure survival and perpetuate
13 pages (3250 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic American hegemony in the global economic system for FREE!