There have been numerous controversies surrounding legal definition of terrorism. Left-wing critics claim that use of a nation’s armed forces in crushing an opponent’s political progress amounts to terrorism. In this context, a ruling government which uses indiscriminate violence to destroy an opponent’s progress engages in terrorism. Apart from a ruling government, terrorism comprise of violent activities used by nationalists fighting an oppressive regime. In fact the late Nelson Mandela was once branded as a terrorist by the white government in South Africa. This means that these controversies undermine existence of a definite boundary between justifiable uses of violence for political progress. Fraser and Staniforth (2012) says that from a legal perspective, UK law defines terrorism as any act of violence that causes or threatens to cause indiscriminate loss of lives, property damage and create a serious risk to health and safety of the public. The UK government takes any such form of violence which seeks to influence governmental institutions or the public as acts of terror. Terrorism is not new in Britain. In the last decade, British security forces arrested approximately 1800 people in connection to terror related cases. Most of these individuals arrested are British citizens involved or associated with accomplishing assistance roles in extremist activities. Demographics show that a substantial portion of those arrested are radical youth lured by perpetrators towards a path of violent extremism.
Cite this document
(“Government response to terrorism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/social-science/630874-government-response-to-terrorism
(Government Response to Terrorism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3250 Words)
“Government Response to Terrorism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/social-science/630874-government-response-to-terrorism.
Cited: 0 times
In the paper “Government response to terrorism” the author analyzes terrorism as a political concept which involves employment of violence by one party in order to exert coercion on other parties. Terrorism entails all coercive acts of violence and intimidation intended to cause fear and harm…
However, not enough attention is given to the divergent forms of terrorism and the fact that different terrorists have different reasons for carrying out terror attacks. By focusing on the analysis and comparison of state, left-wing versus right wing, and religious terrorism, this paper will elucidate on these types of terrorism and help explicate on how one act of terrorism differs from the other.
Through their unconventional cell structure, al-Qaeda was able to avoid this tradeoff to some extent, having both a relatively high lethality and survivability. But this tradeoff has come back to haunt them in non-conventional warfare. In essence, CBRNE/WMD attacks by terrorists could be highly deadly but are not likely to be very frequent; meanwhile, cyber-attacks are likely to be frequent but are not likely to cascade to do very much damage.
Of course, these horrific attacks cannot be overlooked but these are not the only terrorist attacks in the history. It has existed in the world for a very long time. It is a criminal activity which is meant to bring a change in the world and is usually not committed by the official governments.
US Government and Terrorism
Most people agree with the claim that terrorism is a different kind of offence. So, the way terrorists should be dealt with is a bone of contention among the thinkers today. Many of them claim theoretically that military courts are better at dealing with terrorism whereas others believe that civil courts are not so naive as critics claim.
The author states that in response to this threat, gradually over five decades of work, the international community has developed a common universal legal framework against terrorism. This framework is comprised of the 19 universal legal instruments against terrorism along with the relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
'As a matter of fact all the three of them have been conferred the Nobel Peace Prize.' (Weiss, pp. 11+, 2002)
Then how can one define terrorism If truth be told, terrorism, a word on everyone's lips, though pretty easy to talk about, but is duly intricate to define.
The government’s response towards a terrorist attack should positively work to avert any miniscule possibilities of such events in future. Some of the strategies for the government to follow in response to a terrorist attack can be the following.
Terrorism has caused wide ripples in the UK society in the last few decades. The UK society and government was affected initially by the Irish republican terrorism and later by Islamic terrorism. It is often seen that UK tastes its own medicine. Many are of the