The Use or Threat of Violence - Essay Example

Law Enforcement through the Use or Threat of Violence No we cannot enforce law without using or threatening to use violence. Using current happenings In the end, also give 2 points of your own opinions of why violence is needed to enforce law. 1. Threat of violence may be in form of verbal outbreaks and psychological terrorisation that is necessary in a communication process to depict the seriousness of a situation. 2. If violently attacked, for instance, in a riot, it is necessary to use violence because it is a life and death situation for both parties.

Law enforcers are empowered to use any necessary means to quell violent demonstrations such as the 2011 Egyptian revolution. 3. Teargas is a form of police violence that is necessary in crowd dispersal. Unruly protestors seeking to gain access to private property or holding illegal gatherings are good examples of such scenarios. 4. The public expects the use of violence from police if a situation requires necessary force (Harmon 1120). If this they do not show this power, the public may display intolerable arrogance that may result in disorder. 5. Police brutality is necessary for people who have no disregard to human life, such as violent inmates.

Necessary force ensures that such people do not influence others or cause unnecessary damage. 6. Law enforcers risk their lives in the line of duty and should do anything possible to ensure they are safe and safeguard their lives. For instance, if a suspect hits a police officer with a stone and inflicts serious injury, the necessary response is the use of a baton or a gun. 7. Although laws in the constitution protect it, there is no proper definition of excessive force, and it characterizes reacting to the situation at hand to achieve a legitimate goal.

Law enforcers need all the necessary permission to handle situations, most of which are not outlined in the constitution. 8. Individuals are different, and the actions of one criminal is not comparable to another. Similarly, threats and violence is not applicable in similar measure to different criminals, hence it cannot be restricted or outlined on how to go about it. 9. The law enforcing system may be failing to some extent, and there is the need for some police to ensure they perform their duties to their capability, even if it means introducing excessive and necessary force. 10. There is the need to use necessary force to subdue a person in case one resists arrest.

Resisting arrest is a criminal offense and warrants the use of force to put suspects into custody. 11. If police do not use force, criminals may see a leeway to display their aggression and arrogance. Some form of intimidation is definitely necessary to ensure that there is some form of fear instilled in the public and lawbreakers. Law enforcement is only possible if there is some form of respect among law enforcers and citizens. References Harmon, Rachael. (2008). When Is Police Violence Justified?

North-western University Law Review, Vol. 102, No. 3