This paper stresses that the law has provided different safeguards that prohibit the mistreatment of animals whether at homes, in the laboratories or even while they are in their natural habitats. The essence of the establishment of such laws is to ensure that animals are safeguarded from being subjected to painful and other physical suffering by humans. Thus, if the law could go all the way to establish safeguards that alleviate different forms of animal suffering that might be caused by their interactions with humans, it is logical that animal life is considered equally important. However, there is no need for laws that safeguard animals from being subjected to different forms of mistreatment by humans, if the animals can also be subjected to even worse treatment in the laboratories and other medical experimentation facilities.
This report makes a conclusion that animal testing has been applied productively throughout the human history, in order to develop different medication and treatment procedure for humans. While this is a noble outcome of animal testing, many animals have suffered and others lost their lives in the process, with over 2 million animals being subjected to animal testing every year in the USA alone. The time and financial costs involved in animal testing are also huge, yet there are cheap technological alternatives which may give similar results while utilizing less time and resources. Due to the fact that all life is precious, whether animal or human life, there is a need to abolish animal testing. In its place, different alternatives that are time and financially cheaper, yet not costly in terms of lives lost and suffering endured by the animals can be adapted.